LLVM disassembler can generate comments for disassembled instructions.
The patch enables printing these comments for 'llvm-objdump -d'.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104699
We can exploit branches by `undef` condition. Frankly, the LangRef says that
such branches are UB, so we can assume that all outgoing edges of such blocks
are dead.
However, from practical perspective, we know that this is not supported correctly
in some other places. So we are being conservative about it.
Branch by undef is treated in the following way:
- If it is a loop-exiting branch, we always assume it exits the loop;
- If not, we arbitrarily assume it takes `true` value.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104689
Reviewed By: nikic
cli-wrapper-mpxtable.cpp was emitting warnings from printfs of
uint64_t on 32 bit arm build. This patch makes affected printfs
in cli-wrapper-mpxtable.cpp portable accross targets variants.
This test is again failing across multiple bots and passing on others
there is no reliable way to enable it for some of the bots while
disabling for the unsupported ones. Tagging it as unsupported across all
types of Arm 32 bit cores.
A combination of features ^ that lead to a mismatch of expectations
about how a subprogram definition DIE would be produced with/without a
declaration when taking full -g debug info and inlining it into a -gmlt
CU - specifically when using Split DWARF that doesn't support cross-CU
references, so we have to put the -g debug info into the -gmlt CU, which
gets confusing about which mode is respected.
This patch comes down on respecting the CU the debug info is emitted
into, rather than preserving the full debug info when it's emitted into
the gmlt CU.
We use (and (ctpop X), 1) to represent parity.
The generated code for i32 parity on RV64 has more instructions than
necessary which I hope to improve in a followup patch.
Also add missing test for i64 ctpop.
After D104475 / D104658, building the Linux kernel with ThinLTO is
broken:
ld.lld: error: Unknown attribute kind (73) (Producer: 'LLVM13.0.0git'
Reader: 'LLVM 13.0.0git')
getAttrFromCode() has never handled this attribute so it is written
during the ThinLTO phase but it cannot be handled during the linking
phase.
Add noprofile to getAttrFromCode() so that disassembly works properly.
Reviewed By: MaskRay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104995
I thought this might help with another optimization I was
thinking about, but I don't think it will. So it just wastes
compile time calling computeKnownBits for no benefit.
This reverts commit 81b2f95971.
For the start shortening optimization, always use a i8 type for
the GEP, as it is a raw offset calculation.
Handling of non-i8* memset/memcpy arguments requires insertion
of casts. These cases were previously miscompiled, as the offset
calculation was performed on the wrong type.
Apparently, it is legal to use memcpy/memset with pointer types
other than i8*. Prior to 81fcdae68c
this case was silently miscompiled, as the i8 offset calculation
was performed on some other type. Now it would crash due to a
type mismatch. Fix this by inserting an explicit bitcast to i8*.
This is an extension of the handling for unary intrinsics and
follows the logic that we use for binary ops.
We don't canonicalize to min/max intrinsics yet, but this might
help unlock other folds seen in D98152.
This patch updates VPWidenPHI recipes for first-order recurrences to
also track the incoming value from the back-edge. Similar to D99294,
which did the same for reductions.
Reviewed By: Ayal
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104197
libunwind uses unwind info to find the function address belonging
to the current instruction pointer. libunwind/src/CompactUnwinder.hpp's
step functions read functionStart for UNWIND_X86_64_MODE_STACK_IND
(and for nothing else), so these encodings need a dedicated entry
per function, so that the runtime can get the stacksize off the
`subq` instrunction in the function's prologue.
This matches ld64.
(CompactUnwinder.hpp from https://opensource.apple.com/source/libunwind/
also reads functionStart in a few more cases if `SUPPORT_OLD_BINARIES` is set,
but it defaults to 0, and ld64 seems to not worry about these additional
cases.)
Related upstream bug: https://crbug.com/1220175
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104978
llvm-dwarfdump was silent even when the format of DWARF was invalid
and/or llvm-dwarfdump did not understand/support some of the constructs.
This can be pretty confusing as llvm-dwarfdump is a tool for DWARF
producers+consumers development.
Review comments also by @dblaikie.
Reviewed By: jhenderson
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104271
Reduce code duplication: Move various helper functions, that are duplicated in TensorDialect, MemRefDialect, LinalgDialect, StandardDialect, into a new StaticValueUtils.cpp.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104687
Don't allow vectors to split into GPRs for 'r' and other scalar
constraints. Prevents assertion in getCopyToPartsVector.
Makes PR50907 give a better error instead of crashing.
Fix the command line guide for -g/-s/-S.
In particular, previously it was incorrectly stating that -S is an alias for --strip-all.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104888
We need to mask the immediate to the width of a single vector
rather than 2 vectors. If we use the width of 2 vectors then
any shift larger than the length of 1 vector is going to overflow
the shuffle indices.
Fixes PR50895.
In FreeBSD 14 the project will deprecate the _p special profiling
libraries.
Support for -pg (i.e., mcount) still exists but libraries compiled
with -pg will not be built by default, so stop linking against them.
Reviewed by: Dimitry Andric
Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104753
The MVETRUNC node truncates two wide vectors to a single vector with
narrower elements. This is usually lowered to a series of extract/insert
elements, going via GPR registers. This patch changes that to instead
use a pair of truncating stores and a stack reload. This cuts down the
number of instructions at the expense of some stack space.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104515
The feature was implemented in D99005, but we forgot to add the test
macro.
Reviewed By: Quuxplusone
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104984
Currently, when encountering store(trunc(..)) where the trunc is double
a legal vector lenth in MVE, we spilt the node into two different stores
each performing half of the trunc from the wider type. This works well
for efficiently lowering wider than legal types, else the trunc becomes
a series of individual lane moves. Unfortunately this splitting is
currently one of the first combines attempted, so can happen before any
other combines which might be more preferable.
This patch instead introduces the concept of a MVETRUNC ISel node that
the trunk is initially lowered to, to keep it intact as a single item as
opposed to splitting it up. This allows us to push the store(trunc(..))
combine later, allowing other optimisations to potentially happen on the
trunc first. The store(trunc(..)) splitting can then be done later in
the legalisation period if needed, or else fall back to a buildvector as
before.
This can also be used in the future to lower to loads/stores, as opposed
to the more expensive lane extracts/inserts. Some extra combines are
added to keep all the existing tests happy.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91921
This ports the AArch64 SABD and USBD over to DAG Combine, where they can be
used by more backends (notably MVE in a follow-up patch). The matching code
has changed very little, just to handle legal operations and types
differently. It selects from (ABS (SUB (EXTEND a), (EXTEND b))), producing
a ubds/abdu which is zexted to the original type.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91937
I find as I develop I'm moving between many different languages C++,C#,JavaScript all the time. As I move between the file types I like to keep `clang-format` as my formatting tool of choice. (hence why I initially added C# support in {D58404}) I know those other languages have their own tools but I have to learn them all, and I have to work out how to configure them, and they may or may not have integration into my IDE or my source code integration.
I am increasingly finding that I'm editing additional JSON files as part of my daily work and my editor and git commit hooks are just not setup to go and run [[ https://stedolan.github.io/jq/ | jq ]], So I tend to go to [[ https://jsonformatter.curiousconcept.com/ | JSON Formatter ]] and copy and paste back and forth. To get nicely formatted JSON. This is a painful process and I'd like a new one that causes me much less friction.
This has come up from time to time:
{D10543}
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/35856565/clang-format-a-json-filehttps://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18699
I would like to stop having to do that and have formatting JSON as a first class clang-format support `Language` (even if it has minimal style settings at present).
This revision adds support for formatting JSON using the inbuilt JSON serialization library of LLVM, With limited control at present only over the indentation level
This adds an additional Language into the .clang-format file to separate the settings from your other supported languages.
Reviewed By: HazardyKnusperkeks
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93528
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=50702
I believe {D44609} may be too aggressive with brace wrapping rules which doesn't always apply to Lamdbas
The introduction of BeforeLambdaBody and AllowShortLambdasOnASingleLine has impact on brace handling on other block types, which I suspect we didn't see before as people may not be using the BeforeLambdaBody style
From what I can tell this can be seen by the unit test I change as its not honouring the orginal LLVM brace wrapping style for the `Fct()` function
I added a unit test from PR50702 and have removed some of the code (which has zero impact on the unit test, which kind of suggests its unnecessary), some additional attempt has been made to try and ensure we'll only break on what is actually a LamdbaLBrace
Reviewed By: HazardyKnusperkeks
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104222
