Remove nightly features in rustc_type_ir
`rustc_type_ir` will be used as a type library by Chalk, which we want to be able to build on stable, so this PR removes the current nightly features used.
Document "standard" conventions for error messages
These are currently documented in the API guidelines:
https://rust-lang.github.io/api-guidelines/interoperability.html#error-types-are-meaningful-and-well-behaved-c-good-err
I think it makes sense to uplift this guideline (in a milder form) into
std docs. Printing and producing errors is something that even
non-expert users do frequently, so it is useful to give at least some
indication of what a typical error message looks like.
rustdoc: Don't load all extern crates unconditionally
Instead, only load the crates that are linked to with intra-doc links.
This doesn't help very much with any of rustdoc's fundamental issues
with freezing the resolver, but it at least fixes a stable-to-stable
regression, and makes the crate loading model somewhat more consistent
with rustc's. I tested and it unfortunately does not help at all with https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/82496.
Closes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/68427. Let me know if you want me to open a separate issue for not freezing the resolver.
r? `@petrochenkov` cc `@eddyb` `@ollie27`
tidy: Add ignore-rules for the line length check
This is step 1 towards fixing https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/77548.
This PR contains the `tidy` change from https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/77675. The "ignoring file length unnecessarily" check is temporarily disabled to simplify landing the ignore-rules. This check will be re-enabled in a follow-up PR.
This is step 1 towards fixing #77548.
This commit includes the tidy change from #77675.
The "ignoring file length unnecessarily" check is temporarily
disabled to simplify landing the ignore-rules.
That check will be re-enabled in a follow-up PR.
Translate counters from Rust 1-based to LLVM 0-based counter ids
A colleague contacted me and asked why Rust's counters start at 1, when
Clangs appear to start at 0. There is a reason why Rust's internal
counters start at 1 (see the docs), and I tried to keep them consistent
when codegenned to LLVM's coverage mapping format. LLVM should be
tolerant of missing counters, but as my colleague pointed out,
`llvm-cov` will silently fail to generate a coverage report for a
function based on LLVM's assumption that the counters are 0-based.
See:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/main/llvm/lib/ProfileData/Coverage/CoverageMapping.cpp#L170
Apparently, if, for example, a function has no branches, it would have
exactly 1 counter. `CounterValues.size()` would be 1, and (with the
1-based index), the counter ID would be 1. This would fail the check
and abort reporting coverage for the function.
It turns out that by correcting for this during coverage map generation,
by subtracting 1 from the Rust Counter ID (both when generating the
counter increment intrinsic call, and when adding counters to the map),
some uncovered functions (including in tests) now appear covered! This
corrects the coverage for a few tests!
r? `@tmandry`
FYI: `@wesleywiser`
Avoid sorting by DefId for `necessary_variants()`
Follow-up to https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/83074. Originally I tried removing `impl Ord for DefId` but that hit *lots* of errors 😅 so I thought I would start with easy things.
I am not sure whether this could actually cause invalid query results, but this is used from `MarkSymbolVisitor::visit_arm` so it's at least feasible.
r? `@Aaron1011`
A colleague contacted me and asked why Rust's counters start at 1, when
Clangs appear to start at 0. There is a reason why Rust's internal
counters start at 1 (see the docs), and I tried to keep them consistent
when codegenned to LLVM's coverage mapping format. LLVM should be
tolerant of missing counters, but as my colleague pointed out,
`llvm-cov` will silently fail to generate a coverage report for a
function based on LLVM's assumption that the counters are 0-based.
See:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/main/llvm/lib/ProfileData/Coverage/CoverageMapping.cpp#L170
Apparently, if, for example, a function has no branches, it would have
exactly 1 counter. `CounterValues.size()` would be 1, and (with the
1-based index), the counter ID would be 1. This would fail the check
and abort reporting coverage for the function.
It turns out that by correcting for this during coverage map generation,
by subtracting 1 from the Rust Counter ID (both when generating the
counter increment intrinsic call, and when adding counters to the map),
some uncovered functions (including in tests) now appear covered! This
corrects the coverage for a few tests!
Maintain supported sanitizers as a target property
In an effort to remove a hard-coded allow-list for target-sanitizer support correspondence, this PR moves the configuration to the target options.
Perhaps the one notable change made in this PR is this doc-comment:
```rust
/// The sanitizers supported by this target
///
/// Note that the support here is at a codegen level. If the machine code with sanitizer
/// enabled can generated on this target, but the necessary supporting libraries are not
/// distributed with the target, the sanitizer should still appear in this list for the target.
```
Previously the target would typically be added to the allow-list at the same time as the supporting runtime libraries are shipped for the target. However whether we ship the runtime libraries or not needn't be baked into the compiler; and if we don't users will receive a significantly more directed error about library not being found.
Fixes#81802
This commit adds an additional target property – `supported_sanitizers`,
and replaces the hardcoded allowlists in argument parsing to use this
new property.
Fixes#81802
Instead, only load the crates that are linked to with intra-doc links.
This doesn't help very much with any of rustdoc's fundamental issues
with freezing the resolver, but it at least fixes a stable-to-stable
regression, and makes the crate loading model somewhat more consistent
with rustc's.
Fix stack overflow detection on FreeBSD 11.1+
Beginning with FreeBSD 10.4 and 11.1, there is one guard page by
default. And the stack autoresizes, so if Rust allocates its own guard
page, then FreeBSD's will simply move up one page. The best solution is
to just use the OS's guard page.
2229: Support migration via rustfix
- Adds support of machine applicable suggestions for `disjoint_capture_drop_reorder`.
- Doesn't migrate in the case of pre-existing bugs in user code
r? ``@nikomatsakis``
Simplify coverage tests
This change reduces the risk of impacting coverage tests on unrelated
changes (such as MIR and Span changes), and reduces the burden when
blessing coverage changes in case it is necessary.
* Remove all spanview tests. The spanview tests were useful during
development, but they can be generated as needed, via compiler command
line flags. They aren't critical to confirming coverage results. (The
coverage report tests are sufficient.)
When spanview regeneration was necessary, the diffs were way too hard
to read to be useful anyway. So I'm removing them to reduce friction
from a feature that is no longer useful.
* Remove the requirement for `llvm-cov show --debug` when blessing
tests. The `--debug` flag is, unfortunately, only available if LLVM is
built with `optimize = false` (in Rust's config.toml). This adds
significant time and resource burdens to the contributor's build. As
it turns out, for other reasons in the past, I wasn't actually using
the debug output (counter info) to validate coverage anymore either,
so it was required for no reason, I now realize.
Fix double-drop in `Vec::from_iter(vec.into_iter())` specialization when items drop during panic
This fixes the double-drop but it leaves a behavioral difference compared to the default implementation intact: In the default implementation the source and the destination vec are separate objects, so they get dropped separately. Here they share an allocation and the latter only exists as a pointer into the former. So if dropping the former panics then this fix will leak more items than the default implementation would. Is this acceptable or should the specialization also mimic the default implementation's drops-during-panic behavior?
Fixes#83618
`@rustbot` label T-libs-impl
rustdoc: Add unstable option to only emit shared/crate-specific files
The intended use case is for docs.rs, which can now copy exactly the
files it cares about, rather than having to guess based on whether they
have a resource suffix or not. In particular, some files have a resource
suffix but cannot be shared between crates: https://github.com/rust-lang/docs.rs/pull/1312#issuecomment-798783688
The end goal is to fixrust-lang/docs.rs#1327 by reverting rust-lang/docs.rs#1324.
This obsoletes `--print=unversioned-files`, which I plan to remove as
soon as docs.rs stops using it.
I recommend reviewing this one commit at a time.
r? ``@GuillaumeGomez`` cc ``@Nemo157`` ``@pietroalbini``
Rework `std::sys::windows::alloc`
I came across https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/76676#discussion_r488729990, which points out that there was unsound code in the Windows alloc code, creating a &mut to possibly uninitialized memory. I reworked the code so that that particular issue does not occur anymore, and started adding more documentation and safety comments.
Full list of changes:
- moved and documented the relevant Windows Heap API functions
- refactor `allocate_with_flags` to `allocate` (and remove the other helper functions), which now takes just a `bool` if the memory should be zeroed
- add checks for if `GetProcessHeap` returned null
- add a test that checks if the size and alignment of a `Header` are indeed <= `MIN_ALIGN`
- add `#![deny(unsafe_op_in_unsafe_fn)]` and the necessary unsafe blocks with safety comments
I feel like I may have overdone the documenting, the unsoundness fix is the most important part; I could spit this PR up in separate parts.
Only public items are monomorphization roots. This can be confirmed by noting that this program compiles:
```rust
fn foo<T>() { if true { foo::<Option<T>>() } }
fn bar() { foo::<()>() }
```
Rollup of 5 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #83535 (Break when there is a mismatch in the type count)
- #83721 (Add a button to copy the "use statement")
- #83740 (Fix comment typo in once.rs)
- #83745 (Add my new email address to .mailmap)
- #83754 (Add test to ensure search tabs behaviour)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Fix comment typo in once.rs
I believe I came across a minor typo in a comment. I am not particularly familiar with this part of the codebase, but I have read the surrounding code as well as the referenced `park` and `unpark` functions, and I believe my proposed change is true to the intended meaning of the comment.
I intentionally tried to keep the change as minimal as possible. If I have the maintainers' permission, I'd also love to add a comma to improve readability as follows: `Luckily ``park`` comes with the guarantee that if it got an ``unpark`` just before on an unparked thread, it does not park.`
Break when there is a mismatch in the type count
When other errors are generated, there can be a mismatch between the
amount of input types in MIR, and the amount in the function itself.
Break from the comparative loop if this is the case to prevent
out-of-bounds.
Fixes#83499
normalize mir::Constant differently from ty::Const in preparation for valtrees
Valtrees are unable to represent many kind of constant values (this is on purpose). For constants that are used at runtime, we do not need a valtree representation and can thus use a different form of evaluation. In order to make this explicit and less fragile, I added a `fold_constant` method to `TypeFolder` and implemented it for normalization. Normalization can now, when it wants to eagerly evaluate a constant, normalize `mir::Constant` directly into a `mir::ConstantKind::Val` instead of relying on the `ty::Const` evaluation.
In the future we can get rid of the `ty::Const` in there entirely and add our own `Unevaluated` variant to `mir::ConstantKind`. This would allow us to remove the `promoted` field from `ty::ConstKind::Unevaluated`, as promoteds can never occur in the type system.
cc `@rust-lang/wg-const-eval`
r? `@lcnr`
This change reduces the risk of impacting coverage tests on unrelated
changes (such as MIR and Span changes), and reduces the burden when
blessing coverage changes in case it is necessary.
* Remove all spanview tests. The spanview tests were useful during
development, but they can be generated as needed, via compiler command
line flags. They aren't critical to confirming coverage results. (The
coverage report tests are sufficient.)
When spanview regeneration was necessary, the diffs were way too hard
to read to be useful anyway. So I'm removing them to reduce friction
from a feature that is no longer useful.
* Remove the requirement for `llvm-cov show --debug` when blessing
tests. The `--debug` flag is, unfortunately, only available if LLVM is
built with `optimize = false` (in Rust's config.toml). This adds
significant time and resource burdens to the contributor's build. As
it turns out, for other reasons in the past, I wasn't actually using
the debug output (counter info) to validate coverage anymore either,
so it was required for no reason, I now realize.
