In fc357039f9 `#[main]` was removed and replaced with `#[rustc_main]`.
In some place the rename was forgotten, which makes the current code
confusing, because at first glance it seems that `#[main]` is still
around. Perform the renames also in these places.
Make #[cfg(bootstrap)] not error in proc macros on later stages
As was discovered in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/93628#issuecomment-1154697627,
adding #[cfg(bootstrap)] to a rust-internal proc macro crate
would yield an unexpected cfg name error, at least on later
stages wher the bootstrap cfg arg wasn't set.
rustc already passes arguments to mark bootstrap as expected,
however the means of delivery through the RUSTFLAGS env var
is unable to reach proc macro crates, as described
in the issue linked in the code this commit touches.
This wouldn't be an issue for cfg args that get passed through
RUSTFLAGS, as they would never become *active* either, so
any usage of one of these flags in a proc macro's code would
legitimately yield a lint warning. But since dc30258,
rust takes extra measures to pass --cfg=bootstrap even in
proc macros, by passing it via the wrapper. Thus, we need
to send the flags to mark bootstrap as expected also from the
wrapper, so that #[cfg(bootstrap)] also works from proc macros.
I want to thank `Urgau` and `jplatte` for helping me find the cause of this. ❤️
debuginfo: Fix NatVis for Rc and Arc with unsized pointees.
Currently, the NatVis for `Rc<T>` and `Arc<T>` does not support unsized `T`. For both `Rc<T>` and `Rc<dyn SomeTrait>` the visualizers fail:
```txt
[Reference count] : -> must be used on pointers and . on structures
[Weak reference count] : -> must be used on pointers and . on structures
```
This PR fixes the visualizers. For slices we can even give show the elements, so one now gets something like:
```txt
slice_rc : { len=3 }
[Length] : 3
[Reference count] : 41
[Weak reference count] : 2
[0] : 1
[1] : 2
[2] : 3
```
r? `@wesleywiser`
Entry and_modify doc
This PR modifies the documentation for [HashMap](https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/collections/struct.HashMap.html#) and [BTreeMap](https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/collections/struct.BTreeMap.html#) by introducing examples for `and_modify`. `and_modify` is a function that tends to give more idiomatic rust code when dealing with these data structures -- yet it lacked examples and was hidden away. This PR adds that and addresses #98122.
I've made some choices which I tried to explain in my commits. This is my first time contributing to rust, so hopefully, I made the right choices.
Support lint expectations for `--force-warn` lints (RFC 2383)
Rustc has a `--force-warn` flag, which overrides lint level attributes and forces the diagnostics to always be warn. This means, that for lint expectations, the diagnostic can't be suppressed as usual. This also means that the expectation would not be fulfilled, even if a lint had been triggered in the expected scope.
This PR now also tracks the expectation ID in the `ForceWarn` level. I've also made some minor adjustments, to possibly catch more bugs and make the whole implementation more robust.
This will probably conflict with https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/97718. That PR should ideally be reviewed and merged first. The conflict itself will be trivial to fix.
---
r? `@wesleywiser`
cc: `@flip1995` since you've helped with the initial review and also discussed this topic with me. 🙃
Follow-up of: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/87835
Issue: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/85549
Yeah, and that's it.
Add regression test for #93775Closes#93775, also closes#93022 as it should have the same root cause
r? ```@compiler-errors```
Signed-off-by: Yuki Okushi <jtitor@2k36.org>
Refactor path segment parameter error
This PR attempts to rewrite the error handling for an unexpected parenthesised type parameters to:
- Use provided data instead of re-parsing the whole span
- Add a multipart suggestion to reflect on the changes with an underline
- Remove the unnecessary "if" nesting
Inline `const_eval_select`
To avoid circular link time dependency between core and compiler
builtins when building with `-Zshare-generics`.
r? ```@Amanieu```
Fix generic impl rustdoc json output
Fixes#97986.
The problem in case of generic trait impl is that the trait's items are the same for all the types afterward. But since they're the same, it's safe for rustdoc-json to just ignore them.
A little representation of what's going on:
```rust
trait T {
fn f(); // <- defid 0
}
impl<Y> T for Y {
fn f() {} // <- defid 1
}
struct S; // <- defid 1 (since it matches `impl<Y> T for Y`
```
cc ```@Urgau```
r? ```@CraftSpider```
Fix suggestions for `&a: T` parameters
I've accidentally discovered that we have broken suggestions for `&a: T` parameters:
```rust
fn f(&mut bar: u32) {}
fn main() {
let _ = |&mut a| ();
}
```
```text
error[E0308]: mismatched types
--> ./t.rs:1:6
|
1 | fn f(&mut bar: u32) {}
| ^^^^^^^^-----
| | |
| | expected due to this
| expected `u32`, found `&mut _`
| help: did you mean `bar`: `&u32`
|
= note: expected type `u32`
found mutable reference `&mut _`
error[E0308]: mismatched types
--> ./t.rs:4:23
|
4 | let _: fn(u32) = |&mut a| ();
| ^^^^^--
| | |
| | expected due to this
| expected `u32`, found `&mut _`
| help: did you mean `a`: `&u32`
|
= note: expected type `u32`
found mutable reference `&mut _`
```
It's hard to see, but
1. The help span is overlapping with "expected" spans
2. It suggests `fn f( &u32) {}` (no `mut` and lost parameter name) and `|&u32 ()` (no closing `|` and lost parameter name)
I've tried to fix this.
r? ``@compiler-errors``
os str capacity documentation
This is based on https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/95394 , with expansion and consolidation
to address comments from `@dtolnay` and other `@rust-lang/libs-api` team members.
As was discovered in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/93628#issuecomment-1154697627 ,
adding #[cfg(bootstrap)] to a rust-internal proc macro crate
would yield an unexpected cfg name error, at least on later
stages wher the bootstrap cfg arg wasn't set.
rustc already passes arguments to mark bootstrap as expected,
however the means of delivery through the RUSTFLAGS env var
is unable to reach proc macro crates, as described
in the issue linked in the code this commit touches.
This wouldn't be an issue for cfg args that get passed through
RUSTFLAGS, as they would never become *active* either, so
any usage of one of these flags in a proc macro's code would
legitimately yield a lint warning. But since dc302587e2,
rust takes extra measures to pass --cfg=bootstrap even in
proc macros, by passing it via the wrapper. Thus, we need
to send the flags to mark bootstrap as expected also from the
wrapper, so that #[cfg(bootstrap)] also works from proc macros.
I want to thank Urgau and jplatte for helping me find the cause of this. ❤️
Add a `BorrowedFd::try_clone_to_owned` and accompanying documentation
Add a `BorrowedFd::try_clone_to_owned`, which returns a new `OwnedFd` sharing the underlying file description. And similar for `BorrowedHandle` and `BorrowedSocket` on WIndows.
This is similar to the existing `OwnedFd::try_clone`, but it's named differently to reflect that it doesn't return `Result<Self, ...>`. I'm open to suggestions for better names.
Also, extend the `unix::io` documentation to mention that `dup` is permitted on `BorrowedFd`.
This was originally requsted [here](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/88564#issuecomment-910786081). At the time I wasn't sure whether it was desirable, but it does have uses and it helps clarify the API. The documentation previously didn't rule out using `dup` on a `BorrowedFd`, but the API only offered convenient ways to do it from an `OwnedFd`. With this patch, the API allows one to do `try_clone` on any type where it's permitted.
[RFC 2011] Minimal initial implementation
Tracking issue: #44838
Third step of #96496
Implementation has ~290 LOC with the bare minimum to be in a functional state. Currently only searches for binary operations to mimic what `assert_eq!` and `assert_ne!` already do.
r? `@oli-obk`
STD support for the Nintendo 3DS
Rustc already supports compiling for the Nintendo 3DS using the `armv6k-nintendo-3ds` target (Tier 3). Until now though, only `core` and `alloc` were supported. This PR adds standard library support for the Nintendo 3DS. A notable exclusion is `std::thread` support, which will come in a follow-up PR as it requires more complicated changes.
This has been a joint effort by `@Meziu,` `@ian-h-chamberlain,` myself, and prior work by `@rust3ds` members.
### Background
The Nintendo 3DS (Horizon OS) is a mostly-UNIX looking system, with the caveat that it does not come with a full libc implementation out of the box. On the homebrew side (I'm not under NDA), the libc interface is partially implemented by the [devkitPro](https://devkitpro.org/wiki/devkitPro_pacman) toolchain and a user library like [`libctru`](https://github.com/devkitPro/libctru). This is important because there are [some possible legal barriers](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/88529#issuecomment-919938396) to linking directly to a library that uses the underlying platform APIs, since they might be considered a trade secret or under NDA.
To get around this, the standard library impl for the 3DS does not directly depend on any platform-level APIs. Instead, it expects standard libc functions to be linked in. The implementation of these libc functions is left to the user. Some functions are provided by the devkitPro toolchain, but in our testing, we used the following to fill in the other functions:
- [`libctru`] - provides more basic APIs, such as `nanosleep`. Linked in by way of [`ctru-sys`](https://github.com/Meziu/ctru-rs/tree/master/ctru-sys).
- [`pthread-3ds`](https://github.com/Meziu/pthread-3ds) - provides pthread APIs for `std::thread`. Implemented using [`libctru`].
- [`linker-fix-3ds`](https://github.com/Meziu/rust-linker-fix-3ds) - fulfills some other missing libc APIs. Implemented using [`libctru`].
For more details, see the `src/doc/rustc/src/platform-support/armv6k-nintendo-3ds.md` file added in this PR.
### Notes
We've already upstreamed changes to the [`libc`] crate to support this PR, as well as the upcoming threading PR. These changes have all been released as of 0.2.121, so we bump the crate version in this PR.
Edit: After some rebases, the version bump has already been merged so it doesn't appear in this PR.
A lot of the changes in this PR are straightforward, and follow in the footsteps of the ESP-IDF target: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/87666.
The 3DS does not support user space process spawning, so these APIs are unimplemented (similar to ESP-IDF).
[`libctru`]: https://github.com/devkitPro/libctru
[`libc`]: https://github.com/rust-lang/libc
Remove `rustc_deprecated` diagnostics
Follow-up on #95960. The diagnostics will remain until the next bootstrap, at which point people will have had six weeks to adjust.
``@rustbot`` label +A-diagnostics
r? ``@compiler-errors``
Make `ExprKind::Closure` a struct variant.
Simple refactor since we both need it to introduce additional fields in `ExprKind::Closure`.
r? ``@Aaron1011``
Remove thread-local `IGNORED_ATTRIBUTES`.
It's just a copy of the read-only global `ich::IGNORED_ATTRIBUTES`, and
can be removed without any effect.
r? `@michaelwoerister`
Updated the btree's documentation to include two references to
add_modify.
The first is when the `Entry` API is mentioned at the beginning. With
the same reasoning as HashMap's documentation, I thought it would best
to keep `attack`, but show the `mana` example.
The second is with the `entry` function that is used for the `Entry`
API. The code example was a perfect use for `add_modify`, which is why
it was changed to reflect that.
Updated the HashMap's documentation to include two references to
add_modify.
The first is when the `Entry` API is mentioned at the beginning. I was
hesitant to change the "attack" example (although I believe that it is
perfect example of where `add_modify` should be used) because both uses
work equally, but one is more idiomatic (`add_modify`).
The second is with the `entry` function that is used for the `Entry`
API. The code example was a perfect use for `add_modify`, which is why
it was changed to reflect that.
Rollup of 7 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #97822 (Filter out intrinsics if we have other import candidates to suggest)
- #98026 (Move some tests to more reasonable directories)
- #98067 (compiler: remove unused deps)
- #98078 (Use unchecked mul to compute slice sizes)
- #98083 (Rename rustc_serialize::opaque::Encoder as MemEncoder.)
- #98087 (Suggest adding a `#[macro_export]` to a private macro)
- #98113 (Fix misspelling of "constraint" as "contraint")
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Rename rustc_serialize::opaque::Encoder as MemEncoder.
This avoids the name clash with `rustc_serialize::Encoder` (a trait),
and allows lots qualifiers to be removed and imports to be simplified
(e.g. fewer `as` imports).
(This was previously merged as commit 5 in #94732 and then was reverted
in #97905 because of a perf regression caused by commit 4 in #94732.)
r? ```@bjorn3```
Use unchecked mul to compute slice sizes
This allows LLVM to realize that `slice.len() > 0` iff `slice.len() * size_of::<T>() > 0`, allowing a branch on the latter to be folded into the former when dropping vecs and boxed slices, in some cases.
Fixes (partially) #96497
Filter out intrinsics if we have other import candidates to suggest
Fixes#97618
Also open to just sorting these candidates to be last. Pretty easy to modify the code to do that, too.
Improve parsing errors and suggestions for bad `if` statements
1. Parses `if {}` as `if <err> {}` (block-like conditions that are missing a "then" block), and `if true && {}` as `if true && <err> {}` (unfinished binary operation), which is a more faithful recovery and leads to better typeck errors later on.
1. Points out the span of the condition if we don't see a "then" block after it, to help the user understand what is being parsed as a condition (and by elimination, what isn't).
1. Allow `if cond token else { }` to be fixed properly to `if cond { token } else { }`.
1. Fudge with the error messages a bit. This is somewhat arbitrary and I can revert my rewordings if they're useless.
----
Also this PR addresses a strange parsing regression (1.20 -> 1.21) where we chose to reject this piece of code somewhat arbitrarily, even though we should parse it fine:
```rust
fn main() {
if { if true { return } else { return }; } {}
}
```
For context, all of these other expressions parse correctly:
```rust
fn main() {
if { if true { return } else { return } } {}
if { return; } {}
if { return } {}
if { return if true { } else { }; } {}
}
```
The parser used a heuristic to determine if the "the parsed `if` condition makes sense as a condition" that did like a one-expr-deep reachability analysis. This should not be handled by the parser though.
