This script used to be used to extract the grammar sections from the
reference, but there is now a separate src/doc/grammar.md where the
grammar sections that used to be in the reference live, so there is
no longer a need to extract the grammar from the reference.
E.g. if `foo.rs` looks like
#![feature(test)]
extern crate test;
#[bench]
fn bar(b: &mut test::Bencher) {
b.iter(|| {
1
})
}
#[test]
fn baz() {}
#[bench]
fn qux(b: &mut test::Bencher) {
b.iter(|| {
panic!()
})
}
Then
$ rustc --test foo.rs
$ ./foo
running 3 tests
test baz ... ok
test qux ... FAILED
test bar ... ok
failures:
---- qux stdout ----
thread 'qux' panicked at 'explicit panic', bench.rs:17
failures:
qux
test result: FAILED. 2 passed; 1 failed; 0 ignored; 0 measured
$ ./foo --bench ba
running 2 tests
test baz ... ignored
test bar ... bench: 97 ns/iter (+/- 74)
test result: ok. 0 passed; 0 failed; 1 ignored; 1 measured
In particular, the two benchmark are being run as tests in the default
mode.
This helps for the main distribution, since benchmarks are only run with
`PLEASE_BENCH=1`, which is rarely set (and never set on the test bots),
and helps for code-coverage tools: benchmarks are run and so don't count
as dead code.
Fixes#15842.
typeck: Make sure casts from other types to fat pointers are illegal
Fixes ICEs where non-fat pointers and scalars are cast to fat pointers,
Fixes#21397Fixes#22955Fixes#23237Fixes#24100
Adds an `attrs` field to `FieldInfo` which lets one check the attributes on
a field whilst expanding.
This lets deriving plugins be more robust, for example providing the ability to
"ignore" a field for the purpose of deriving, or perhaps handle the field a
different way.
r? @huonw
E.g. if `foo.rs` looks like
#![feature(test)]
extern crate test;
#[bench]
fn bar(b: &mut test::Bencher) {
b.iter(|| {
1
})
}
#[test]
fn baz() {}
#[bench]
fn qux(b: &mut test::Bencher) {
b.iter(|| {
panic!()
})
}
Then
$ rustc --test foo.rs
$ ./foo
running 3 tests
test baz ... ok
test qux ... FAILED
test bar ... ok
failures:
---- qux stdout ----
thread 'qux' panicked at 'explicit panic', bench.rs:17
failures:
qux
test result: FAILED. 2 passed; 1 failed; 0 ignored; 0 measured
$ ./foo --bench ba
running 2 tests
test baz ... ignored
test bar ... bench: 97 ns/iter (+/- 74)
test result: ok. 0 passed; 0 failed; 1 ignored; 1 measured
In particular, the two benchmark are being run as tests in the default
mode.
This helps for the main distribution, since benchmarks are only run with
`PLEASE_BENCH=1`, which is rarely set (and never set on the test bots),
and helps for code-coverage tools: benchmarks are run and so don't count
as dead code.
Fixes#15842.
collections: Implement String::drain(range) according to RFC 574
`.drain(range)` is unstable and under feature(collections_drain).
This adds a safe way to remove any range of a String as efficiently as
possible.
As noted in the code, this drain iterator has none of the memory safety
issues of the vector version.
RFC tracking issue is #23055
Apparently implementations are allowed to return EDEADLK instead of blocking
forever, in which case this can lead to unsafety in the `RwLock` primitive
exposed by the standard library. A debug-build of the standard library would
have caught this error (due to the debug assert), but we don't ship debug
builds right now.
This commit adds explicit checks for the EDEADLK error code and triggers a panic
to ensure the call does not succeed.
Closes#25012
Ensures that the same error type is propagated throughout. Unnecessary leakage
of the internals is prevented through the usage of stability attributes.
Closes#24748
Ensures that the same error type is propagated throughout. Unnecessary leakage
of the internals is prevented through the usage of stability attributes.
Closes#24748
These implementations were intended to be unstable, but currently the stability
attributes cannot handle a stable trait with an unstable `impl` block. This
commit also audits the rest of the standard library for explicitly-`#[unstable]`
impl blocks. No others were removed but some annotations were changed to
`#[stable]` as they're defacto stable anyway.
One particularly interesting `impl` marked `#[stable]` as part of this commit
is the `Add<&[T]>` impl for `Vec<T>`, which uses `push_all` and implicitly
clones all elements of the vector provided.
Closes#24791
[breaking-change]
`.drain(range)` is unstable and under feature(collections_drain).
This adds a safe way to remove any range of a String as efficiently as
possible.
As noted in the code, this drain iterator has none of the memory safety
issues of the vector version.
RFC tracking issue is #23055
These implementations were intended to be unstable, but currently the stability
attributes cannot handle a stable trait with an unstable `impl` block. This
commit also audits the rest of the standard library for explicitly-`#[unstable]`
impl blocks. No others were removed but some annotations were changed to
`#[stable]` as they're defacto stable anyway.
One particularly interesting `impl` marked `#[stable]` as part of this commit
is the `Add<&[T]>` impl for `Vec<T>`, which uses `push_all` and implicitly
clones all elements of the vector provided.
Closes#24791
- unbreak the build under openbsd
- while here, apply same modification to dragonfly, freebsd, ios (pid_t
imported, but not used in raw.rs)
r? @alexcrichton
cc @wg @mneumann @vhbit
Hi! While researching stuff for the reference and the grammar, I came across a few mentions of using the `priv` keyword that was removed in 0.11.0 (#13547, #8122, rust-lang/rfcs#26, [RFC 0026](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/blob/master/text/0026-remove-priv.md)).
One occurrence is a mention in the reference, a few are in comments, and a few are marking test functions. I left the test that makes sure you can't name an ident `priv` since it's still a reserved keyword. I did a little grepping around for `priv `, priv in backticks, `Private` etc and I think the remaining instances are fine, but if anyone knows anywhere in particular I should check for any other lingering mentions of `priv`, please let me know and I would be happy to! 🍂🌊
This uses a (per-trait) hash-table to separate impls from different TraitDefs, and makes coherence go so much quicker. I will post performance numbers tomorrow.
This is still WIP, as when there's an overlap error, impls can get printed in the wrong order, which causes a few issues. Should I pick the local impl with the smallest NodeId to print?
Could you take a look at this @nikomatsakis?
This commit brings the `Error` trait in line with the [Error interoperation
RFC](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/201) by adding downcasting,
which has long been intended. This change means that for any `Error`
trait objects that are `'static`, you can downcast to concrete error
types.
To make this work, it is necessary for `Error` to inherit from
`Reflect` (which is currently used to mark concrete types as "permitted
for reflection, aka downcasting"). This is a breaking change: it means
that impls like
```rust
impl<T> Error for MyErrorType<T> { ... }
```
must change to
```rust
impl<T: Reflect> Error for MyErrorType<T> { ... }
```
This commit furthermore marks `Reflect` as stable, since we are already
essentially committed to it via `Any`. Note that in the future, if we
determine that the parametricity aspects of `Reflect` are not needed, we
can deprecate the trait and provide a blanket implementation for it
for *all* types (rather than by using OIBIT), which would allow all
mentions of `Reflect` to be dropped over time. So there is not a strong
commitment here.
[breaking-change]
r? @alexcrichton
