Suggest borrowing if a trait implementation is found for &/&mut <type>
This pull request fixes#84973 by suggesting to borrow if a trait is not implemented for some type `T`, but it is for `&T` or `&mut T`. For instance:
```rust
trait Ti {}
impl<T> Ti for &T {}
fn foo<T: Ti>(_: T) {}
trait Tm {}
impl<T> Tm for &mut T {}
fn bar<T: Tm>(_: T) {}
fn main() {
let a: i32 = 5;
foo(a);
let b: Box<i32> = Box::new(42);
bar(b);
}
```
gives, on current nightly:
```
error[E0277]: the trait bound `i32: Ti` is not satisfied
--> t2.rs:11:9
|
3 | fn foo<T: Ti>(_: T) {}
| -- required by this bound in `foo`
...
11 | foo(a);
| ^ the trait `Ti` is not implemented for `i32`
error[E0277]: the trait bound `Box<i32>: Tm` is not satisfied
--> t2.rs:14:9
|
7 | fn bar<T: Tm>(_: T) {}
| -- required by this bound in `bar`
...
14 | bar(b);
| ^ the trait `Tm` is not implemented for `Box<i32>`
error: aborting due to 2 previous errors
```
whereas with my changes, I get:
```
error[E0277]: the trait bound `i32: Ti` is not satisfied
--> t2.rs:11:9
|
3 | fn foo<T: Ti>(_: T) {}
| -- required by this bound in `foo`
...
11 | foo(a);
| ^
| |
| expected an implementor of trait `Ti`
| help: consider borrowing here: `&a`
error[E0277]: the trait bound `Box<i32>: Tm` is not satisfied
--> t2.rs:14:9
|
7 | fn bar<T: Tm>(_: T) {}
| -- required by this bound in `bar`
...
14 | bar(b);
| ^
| |
| expected an implementor of trait `Tm`
| help: consider borrowing mutably here: `&mut b`
error: aborting due to 2 previous errors
```
In my implementation, I have added a "blacklist" to make these suggestions flexible. In particular, suggesting to borrow can interfere with other suggestions, such as to add another trait bound to a generic argument. I have tried to configure this blacklist to cause the least amount of test case failures, i.e. to model the current behavior as closely as possible (I only had to change one existing test case, and this change was quite clearly an improvement).
Report an error if a lang item has the wrong number of generic arguments
This pull request fixes#83893. The issue is that the lang item code currently checks whether the lang item has the correct item kind (e.g. a `#[lang="add"]` has to be a trait), but not whether the item has the correct number of generic arguments.
This can lead to an "index out of bounds" ICE when the compiler tries to create more substitutions than there are suitable types available (if the lang item was declared with too many generic arguments).
For instance, here is a reduced ("reduced" in the sense that it does not trigger additional errors) version of the example given in #83893:
```rust
#![feature(lang_items,no_core)]
#![no_core]
#![crate_type="lib"]
#[lang = "sized"]
trait MySized {}
#[lang = "add"]
trait MyAdd<'a, T> {}
fn ice() {
let r = 5;
let a = 6;
r + a
}
```
On current nightly, this immediately causes an ICE without any warnings or errors emitted. With the changes in this PR, however, I get no ICE and two errors:
```
error[E0718]: `add` language item must be applied to a trait with 1 generic argument
--> pr-ex.rs:8:1
|
8 | #[lang = "add"]
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
9 | trait MyAdd<'a, T> {}
| ------- this trait has 2 generic arguments, not 1
error[E0369]: cannot add `{integer}` to `{integer}`
--> pr-ex.rs:14:7
|
14 | r + a
| - ^ - {integer}
| |
| {integer}
error: aborting due to 2 previous errors
Some errors have detailed explanations: E0369, E0718.
For more information about an error, try `rustc --explain E0369`.
```
Implement more Iterator methods on core::iter::Repeat
`core::iter::Repeat` always returns the same element, which means we can
do better than implementing most `Iterator` methods in terms of
`Iterator::next`.
Fixes#81292.
#81292 raises the question of whether these changes violate the contract of `core::iter::Repeat`, but as far as I can tell `core::iter::repeat` doesn't make any guarantees around how it calls `Clone::clone`.
Provide ExitStatusError
Closes#73125
In MR #81452 "Add #[must_use] to [...] process::ExitStatus" we concluded that the existing arrangements in are too awkward so adding that `#[must_use]` is blocked on improving the ergonomics.
I wrote a mini-RFC-style discusion of the approach in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/73125#issuecomment-771092741
This adds a new lint to `rustc` that is used in rustdoc when a code
block is empty or cannot be parsed as valid Rust code.
Previously this was unconditionally a warning. As such some
documentation comments were (unknowingly) abusing this to pass despite
the `-Dwarnings` used when compiling `rustc`, this should not be the
case anymore.
Rollup of 8 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #85087 (`eval_fn_call`: check the ABI of `body.source`)
- #85302 (Expand WASI abbreviation in docs)
- #85355 (More tests for issue-85255)
- #85367 (Fix invalid input:disabled CSS selector)
- #85374 (mark internal inplace_iteration traits as hidden)
- #85408 (remove size field from Allocation)
- #85409 (Simplify `cfg(any(unix, target_os="redox"))` in example to just `cfg(unix)`)
- #85412 (remove some functions that were only used by Miri)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Simplify `cfg(any(unix, target_os="redox"))` in example to just `cfg(unix)`
Update example for `OsString` that handled `redox` seperately from `unix`: Redox has been completely integrated under `target_family="unix"`, so `cfg(unix)` implies `target_os="redox"`
35dbef2350/compiler/rustc_target/src/spec/redox_base.rs (L26)
Expand WASI abbreviation in docs
I was pretty sure this was related to something for WebAssembly but wasn't 100% sure so I checked but even on these top-level docs I couldn't find the abbreviation expanded. I'm normally used to Rust docs being detailed and explanatory and writing abbreviations like this out in full at least once so I thought it was worth the change. Feel free to close this if it's too much.
Update RLS
Contains https://github.com/rust-lang/rls/pull/1736. With #82208 merged, this should now close https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/85225. Tested locally with `./x.py test src/tools/rls` and seems to be working as expected.
I noticed the rustfmt merge didn't trigger toolstate upgrade (because we pruned most but not all of the related machinery?), so I'd rather get this rubber-stamped by someone more knowledgeable with infra/the merged changes in case I missed something and need to include something else here to unbreak the RLS toolstate.
r? `@Mark-Simulacrum`
Parse unnamed fields of struct and union type
Added the `unnamed_fields` feature gate.
This is a prototype of [RFC 2102](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/49804), so any suggestions are greatly appreciated.
r? `@petrochenkov`
Remove CrateNum parameter for queries that only work on local crate
The pervasive `CrateNum` parameter is a remnant of the multi-crate rustc idea.
Using `()` as query key in those cases avoids having to worry about the validity of the query key.
rustc_codegen_ssa: only create backend `BasicBlock`s as-needed.
Instead of creating one backend (e.g. LLVM) block per MIR block ahead of time, and then deleting the ones that weren't visited, this PR moves to creating the blocks as they're needed (either reached via the RPO visit, or used as the target of a branch from a different block).
As deleting a block was the only `unsafe` builder method (generally we only *create* backend objects, not *remove* them), that's gone now and codegen is overall a bit safer.
The only change in output is the order of LLVM blocks (which AFAIK has no semantic meaning, other than the first block being the entry block). This happens because the blocks are now created due to control-flow edges, rather than MIR block order.
I'm making this a standalone PR because I keep getting wild perf results when I change *anything* in codegen, but if you want to read more about my plans in this area, see https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/84771#issuecomment-830636256 (and https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/84771#issue-628295651 - but that may be a bit outdated).
(You may notice some of the APIs in this PR, like `append_block`, don't help with the future plans - but I didn't want to include the necessary refactors that pass a build around everywhere, in this PR, so it's a small compromise)
r? `@nagisa` `@bjorn3`
Fix unused attributes on macro_rules.
The `unused_attributes` lint wasn't firing on attributes of `macro_rules` definitions. The consequence is that many attributes are silently ignored on `macro_rules`. The reason is that `unused_attributes` is a late-lint pass, and only has access to the HIR, which does not have macro_rules definitions.
My solution here is to change `non_exported_macro_attrs` to be `macro_attrs` (a list of all attributes used for `macro_rules`, instead of just those for `macro_export`), and then to check this list in the `unused_attributes` lint. There are a number of alternate approaches, but this seemed the most reliable and least invasive. I am open to completely different approaches, though.
One concern is that I don't fully understand the implications of extending `non_exported_macro_attrs` to include non-exported macros. That list was originally added in #62042 to handle stability attributes, so I suspect it was just an optimization since that was all that was needed. It was later extended to be included in SVH in #83901. #80641 also added a use to check for `invalid` attributes, which seems a little odd to me (it didn't validate non-exported macros, and seems highly specific).
Overall, there doesn't seem to be a clear story of when `unused_attributes` should be used versus an error like E0518. I considered alternatively using an "allow list" of built-in attributes that can be used on macro_rules (allow, warn, deny, forbid, cfg, cfg_attr, macro_export, deprecated, doc), but I feel like that could be a pain to maintain.
Some built-in attributes already present hard-errors when used with macro_rules. These are each hard-coded in various places:
- `derive`
- `test` and `bench`
- `proc_macro` and `proc_macro_derive`
- `inline`
- `global_allocator`
The primary motivation is that I sometimes see people use `#[macro_use]` in front of `macro_rules`, which indicates there is some confusion out there (evident that there was even a case of it in rustc).
Remove support for floating-point constants in asm!
Floating-point constants aren't very useful anyways and this simplifies
the code since the type check can now be done in typeck.
cc `@rust-lang/wg-inline-asm`
r? `@nagisa`
Reachable statics have reachable initializers
Static initializer can read other statics. Initializers are evaluated at
compile time, and so their content could become inlined into another
crate. Ensure that initializers of reachable statics are also reachable.
Previously, when an item incorrectly considered to be unreachable was
reached from another crate an attempt would be made to codegen it. The
attempt could fail with an ICE (in the case MIR wasn't available to do
so) in some circumstances the attempt could also succeed resulting in
a local codegen of non-local items, including static ones.
Fixes#84455.
