It's a rather useful syntax, and non-obvious.
A friend of mine is learning Rust and was trying to find a way to easily do such an initialization — he couldn't find it in the guide and was pretty surprised when I showed him. Looks like something that should be mentioned.
r? @steveklabnik
This PR makes rustc emit debug locations for *all* call and invoke statements in LLVM IR, if they are contained within a function that debuginfo is enabled for. This is important because LLVM does not handle the case where a function body containing debuginfo is inlined into another function with debuginfo, but the inlined call statement does not have a debug location. In this case, LLVM will not know where (in terms of source code coordinates) the function was inlined to and we end up with some statements still linked to the source locations in there original, non-inlined function without any indication that they are indeed an inline-copy. Later, when generating DWARF from the IR, LLVM will interpret this as corrupt IR and abort.
Unfortunately, the undesirable case described above can still occur when using LTO. If there is a crate compiled without debuginfo calling into a crate compiled with debuginfo, we again end up with the conditions triggering the error. This is why some LTO tests still fail with the dreaded assertion, if the standard library was built with debuginfo enabled. That is, `RUSTFLAGS_STAGE2=-g make rustc-stage2` will succeed but `RUSTFLAGS_STAGE2=-g make check` will still fail after this PR has been merged. I will open a separate issue for this problem.
Everyone agreed.
Fix#17078#14248 seems completed, as every src/test/bench/shootout-*.rs are relicensed after acceptation of this PR except:
- shootout-ackermann.rs: obsolete shootout bench
- shootout-fibo.rs: obsolete shootout bench
- shootout-k-nucleotide-pipes.rs: slower that shootout-k-nucleotide-pipes.rs (and not so interesting as a benchmark)
- shootout-pfib.rs: does not seems related to the shootout
@brson OK?
Replaces BTree with BTreeMap and BTreeSet, which are completely new implementations.
BTreeMap's internal Node representation is particularly inefficient at the moment to
make this first implementation easy to reason about and fairly safe. Both collections
are also currently missing some of the tooling specific to sorted collections, which
is planned as future work pending reform of these APIs. General implementation issues
are discussed with TODOs internally
[breaking-change]
Still waiting on compilation/test/bench stuff locally, but the edit-distance on any errors should be very small at this point. This is ready to be reviewed.
Replaces BTree with BTreeMap and BTreeSet, which are completely new implementations.
BTreeMap's internal Node representation is particularly inefficient at the moment to
make this first implementation easy to reason about and fairly safe. Both collections
are also currently missing some of the tooling specific to sorted collections, which
is planned as future work pending reform of these APIs. General implementation issues
are discussed with TODOs internally
Perf results on x86_64 Linux:
test treemap::bench::find_rand_100 ... bench: 76 ns/iter (+/- 4)
test treemap::bench::find_rand_10_000 ... bench: 163 ns/iter (+/- 6)
test treemap::bench::find_seq_100 ... bench: 77 ns/iter (+/- 3)
test treemap::bench::find_seq_10_000 ... bench: 115 ns/iter (+/- 1)
test treemap::bench::insert_rand_100 ... bench: 111 ns/iter (+/- 1)
test treemap::bench::insert_rand_10_000 ... bench: 996 ns/iter (+/- 18)
test treemap::bench::insert_seq_100 ... bench: 486 ns/iter (+/- 20)
test treemap::bench::insert_seq_10_000 ... bench: 800 ns/iter (+/- 15)
test btree::map::bench::find_rand_100 ... bench: 74 ns/iter (+/- 4)
test btree::map::bench::find_rand_10_000 ... bench: 153 ns/iter (+/- 5)
test btree::map::bench::find_seq_100 ... bench: 82 ns/iter (+/- 1)
test btree::map::bench::find_seq_10_000 ... bench: 108 ns/iter (+/- 0)
test btree::map::bench::insert_rand_100 ... bench: 220 ns/iter (+/- 1)
test btree::map::bench::insert_rand_10_000 ... bench: 620 ns/iter (+/- 16)
test btree::map::bench::insert_seq_100 ... bench: 411 ns/iter (+/- 12)
test btree::map::bench::insert_seq_10_000 ... bench: 534 ns/iter (+/- 14)
BTreeMap still has a lot of room for optimization, but it's already beating out TreeMap on most access patterns.
[breaking-change]
The sentence "The new iterator `filter()` produces returns only the elements that that closure returned `true` for:" can be structured as:
"The new iterator `filter()` produces only the elements that that closure returned `true` for:"
or as:
"The new iterator `filter()` returns only the elements that that closure returned `true` for:"
however, not both.
I went with "produces", since it then talks about returning true and having "return" so close together doesn't sound nice.
r @steveklabnik ?
over inherent methods accessible via more autoderefs.
This simplifies the trait matching algorithm. It breaks code like:
impl Foo {
fn foo(self) {
// before this change, this will be called
}
}
impl<'a,'b,'c> Trait for &'a &'b &'c Foo {
fn foo(self) {
// after this change, this will be called
}
}
fn main() {
let x = &(&(&Foo));
x.foo();
}
To explicitly indicate that you wish to call the inherent method, perform
explicit dereferences. For example:
fn main() {
let x = &(&(&Foo));
(***x).foo();
}
Part of #17282.
[breaking-change]
r? @nikomatsakis
over inherent methods accessible via more autoderefs.
This simplifies the trait matching algorithm. It breaks code like:
impl Foo {
fn foo(self) {
// before this change, this will be called
}
}
impl<'a,'b,'c> Trait for &'a &'b &'c Foo {
fn foo(self) {
// after this change, this will be called
}
}
fn main() {
let x = &(&(&Foo));
x.foo();
}
To explicitly indicate that you wish to call the inherent method, perform
explicit dereferences. For example:
fn main() {
let x = &(&(&Foo));
(***x).foo();
}
Part of #17282.
[breaking-change]
This commit is another in the series of vector slice API stabilization. The focus here is the *mutable* slice API.
Largely, this API inherits the stability attributes [previously assigned](rust-lang#16332) to the analogous methods on immutable slides. It also adds comments to a few `unstable` attributes that were previously missing them.
In addition, the commit adds several `_mut` variants of APIs that were missing:
- `init_mut`
- `head_mut`
- `tail_mut`
- `splitn_mut`
- `rsplitn_mut`
Some of the unsafe APIs -- `unsafe_set`, `init_elem`, and `copy_memory` -- were deprecated in favor of working through `as_mut_ptr`, to simplify the API surface.
Due to deprecations, this is a:
[breaking-change]
The tuple serialization logic should be using the tuple-specific emit function. This fixes part of #17158. The JSON encoder already proxies to `emit_seq_elt` when `emit_tuple_arg` is called, so this should have an effect.
This commit is another in the series of vector slice API
stabilization. The focus here is the *mutable* slice API.
Largely, this API inherits the stability attributes [previously
assigned](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/16332) to the analogous
methods on immutable slides. It also adds comments to a few `unstable`
attributes that were previously missing them.
In addition, the commit adds several `_mut` variants of APIs that were
missing:
- `init_mut`
- `head_mut`
- `tail_mut`
- `splitn_mut`
- `rsplitn_mut`
Some of the unsafe APIs -- `unsafe_set`, `init_elem`, and `copy_memory`
-- were deprecated in favor of working through `as_mut_ptr`, to simplify
the API surface.
Due to deprecations, this is a:
[breaking-change]
Moves the vast majority of builtin bound checking out of type contents and into the trait system.
This is a preliminary step for a lot of follow-on work:
- opt-in builtin types, obviously
- generalized where clauses, because TypeContents has this notion that a type parameter has a single set of builtin kinds, but with where clauses it depends on context
- generalized coherence, because this adds support for recursive trait selection
Unfortunately I wasn't able to completely remove Type Contents from the front-end checking in this PR. It's still used by EUV to decide what gets moved and what doesn't.
r? @pcwalton
Intended to prevent each user to write his own partial_min/max, possibly differing in slight details. @sfackler encouraged to PR this on IRC.
(Let's hope this works... First PR.)
OrdIterator: the doc says that values must implement `PartialOrd`, while the implementation is only for `Ord` values. It looks like this initially got out of sync in 4e1c215. Removed the doc sentence entirely since it seems redundant.
MultiplicativeIterator: Fixed weird sentence.
This commit makes rustc emit debug locations for all call
and invoke statements in LLVM IR, if they are contained
within a function that debuginfo is enabled for. This is
important because LLVM does not handle the case where a
function body containing debuginfo is inlined into another
function with debuginfo, but the inlined call statement
does not have a debug location. In this case, LLVM will
not know where (in terms of source code coordinates) the
function was inlined to and we end up with some statements
still linked to the source locations in there original,
non-inlined function without any indication that they are
indeed an inline-copy. Later, when generating DWARF from
the IR, LLVM will interpret this as corrupt IR and abort.
Unfortunately, the undesirable case described above can
still occur when using LTO. If there is a crate compiled
without debuginfo calling into a crate compiled with
debuginfo, we again end up with the conditions triggering
the error. This is why some LTO tests still fail with the
dreaded assertion, if the standard library was built with
debuginfo enabled.
That is, `RUSTFLAGS_STAGE2=-g make rustc-stage2` will
succeed but `RUSTFLAGS_STAGE2=-g make check` will still
fail after this commit has been merged. This is a problem
that has to be dealt with separately.
Fixes#17201Fixes#15816Fixes#15156
