Assertions without a message get a generated message that consists of a
prefix plus the stringified expression that is being asserted. That
prefix is currently a unique string, while a static string would be
sufficient and needs less code.
Builds are considerably faster without assertions, so when working on
e.g. libstd, which doesn't directly interact with LLVM, one might want
to disable them.
This is a preliminary implementation of `for ... in ... { ...}` using a transitionary keyword `foreach`. Codesize seems to be a little bit down (10% or less non-opt) and otherwise it seems quite trivial to rewrite lambda-based loops to use it. Once we've rewritten the codebase away from lambda-based `for` we can retarget that word at the same production, snapshot, rewrite the keywords in one go, and expire `foreach`.
Feedback welcome. It's a desugaring-based approach which is arguably something we should have been doing for other constructs before. I apologize both for the laziness associated with doing it this way and with any sense that I'm bending rules I put in place previously concerning "never doing desugarings". I put the expansion in `expand.rs` and would be amenable to the argument that the code there needs better factoring / more helpers / to move to a submodule or helper function. It does seem to work at this point, though, and I gather we'd like to get the shift done relatively quickly.
This removes a bunch of options from the task builder interface that are irrelevant to the new scheduler and were generally unused anyway. It also bumps the stack size of new scheduler tasks so that there's enough room to run rustc and changes the interface to `Thread` to not implicitly join threads on destruction, but instead require an explicit, and mandatory, call to `join`.
Assertions without a message get a generated message that consists of a
prefix plus the stringified expression that is being asserted. That
prefix is currently a unique string, while a static string would be
sufficient and needs less code.
Builds are considerably faster without assertions, so when working on
e.g. libstd, which doesn't directly interact with LLVM, one might want
to disable them.
Main logic in ```Implement select() for new runtime pipes.```. The guts of the ```PortOne::try_recv()``` implementation are now split up across several functions, ```optimistic_check```, ```block_on```, and ```recv_ready```.
There is one weird FIXME I left open here, in the "implement select" commit -- an assertion I couldn't get to work in the receive path, on an invariant that for some reason doesn't hold with ```SharedPort```. Still investigating this.
