llvm/flang/documentation/mod-files.md
Tim Keith f62f8b655d [flang] Implement reading of module files
When a use-stmt is encountered for a module that isn't in the global
scope, search for and read the appropriate `.mod` file. To perform the
search, pass the search directories in to ResolveNames.

For modules that were read from `.mod` files, we have to keep the cooked
source from being deleted so that the names so that references to names
stay valid. So we store the cooked source in the Scope of the module as
a `unique_ptr`.

Add `Symbol::Flag::ModFile` to distinguish module symbols that were read
from a `.mod` file rather than from the current compilation. Use it to
prevent writing those back out.

Fix test_errors.sh to run the compiler in the temp subdirectory --
otherwise tests could be affected by `.mod` files left from previous
tests.

Original-commit: flang-compiler/f18@207065999c
Reviewed-on: https://github.com/flang-compiler/f18/pull/145
2018-07-25 10:11:38 -07:00

150 lines
5.9 KiB
Markdown

# Module Files
Module files hold information from a module that is necessary to compile
program units that depend on the module.
## Name
Module files must be searchable by module name. They are typically named
`<modulename>.mod`. The advantage of using `.mod` is that it is consistent with
other compilers so users will know what they are. Also, makefiles and scripts
often use `rm *.mod` to clean up.
The disadvantage of using the same name as other compilers is that it is not
clear which compiler created a `.mod` file and files from multiple compilers
cannot be in the same directory. This could be solved by adding something
between the module name and extension, e.g. `<modulename>-f18.mod`.
## Format
Module files will be Fortran source.
Declarations of all visible entities will be included, along with private
entities that they depend on.
Entity declarations that span multiple statements will be collapsed into
a single *type-declaration-statement*.
Executable statements will be omitted.
### Header
There will be a header containing extra information that cannot be expressed
in Fortran. This will take the form of a comment or directive
at the beginning of the file.
If it's a comment, the module file reader would have to strip it out and
perform *ad hoc* parsing on it. If it's a directive the compiler could
parse it like other directives as part of the grammar.
Processing the header before parsing might result in better error messages
when the `.mod` file is invalid.
Regardless of whether the header is a comment or directive we can use the
same string to introduce it: `!mod$`.
Information in the header:
- Magic string to confirm it is an f18 `.mod` file
- Version information: to indicate the version of the file format, in case it changes,
and the version of the compiler that wrote the file, for diagnostics.
- Checksum of the body of the current file
- Modules we depend on and the checksum of their module file when the current
module file is created
- The source file that produced the `.mod` file? This could be used in error messages.
### Body
The body will consist of minimal Fortran source for the required declarations.
The order will match the order they first appeared in the source.
Some normalization will take place:
- extraneous spaces will be removed
- implicit types will be made explicit
- attributes will be written in a consistent order
- entity declarations will be combined into a single declaration
- function return types specified in a *prefix-spec* will be replaced by
an entity declaration
- etc.
#### Symbols included
All public symbols from the module need to be included.
In addition, some private symbols are needed:
- private types that appear in the public API
- private components of non-private derived types
- private parameters used in non-private declarations (initial values, kind parameters)
- others?
It might be possible to anonymize private names if users don't want them exposed
in the `.mod` file. (Currently they are readable in PGI `.mod` files.)
#### USE association
A module that contains `USE` statements needs them represented in the
`.mod` file.
Each use-associated symbol will be written as a separate *use-only* statement,
possibly with renaming.
Alternatives:
- Emit a single `USE` for each module, listing all of the symbols that were
use-associated in the *only-list*.
- Detect when all of the symbols from a module are imported (either by a *use-stmt*
without an *only-list* or because all of the public symbols of the module
have been listed in *only-list*s). In that case collapse them into a single *use-stmt*.
- Emit the *use-stmt*s that appeared in the original source.
## Reading and writing module files
### Options
The compiler will have command-line options to specify where to search
for module files and where to write them. By default it will be the current
directory for both.
For PGI, `-I` specifies directories to search for include files and module
files. `-module` specifics a directory to write module files in as well as to
search for them. gfortran is similar except it uses `-J` instead of `-module`.
The search order for module files is:
1. The `-module` directory (Note: for gfortran the `-J` directory is not searched).
2. The current directory
3. The `-I` directories in the order they appear on the command line
### Writing module files
When writing a module file, if the existing one matches what would be written,
the timestamp is not updated.
Module files will be written after semantics, i.e. after the compiler has
determined the module is valid Fortran.<br>
**NOTE:** PGI does create `.mod` files sometimes even when the module has a
compilation error.
Question: If the compiler can get far enough to determine it is compiling a module
but then encounters an error, should it delete the existing `.mod` file?
PGI does not, gfortran does.
### Reading module files
When the compiler finds a `.mod` file it needs to read, it firsts checks the first
line and verifies it is a valid module file. It can also verify checksums of
modules it depends on and report if they are out of date.
If the header is valid, the module file will be run through the parser and name
resolution to recreate the symbols from the module. Once the symbol table is
populated the parse tree can be discarded.
When processing `.mod` files we know they are valid Fortran with these properties:
1. The input (without the header) is already in the "cooked input" format.
2. No preprocessing is necessary.
3. No errors can occur.
## Error messages referring to modules
With this design, diagnostics can refer to names in modules and can emit a
normalized declaration of an entity but not point to its location in the
source.
If the header includes the source file it came from, that could be included in
a diagnostic but we still wouldn't have line numbers.
To provide line numbers and character positions or source lines as the user
wrote them we would have to save some amount of provenance information in the
module file as well.