llvm/mlir/docs/EDSC.md
Alex Zinenko 60f443bb3b [mlir] Change dialect namespace loop->scf
All ops of the SCF dialect now use the `scf.` prefix instead of `loop.`. This
is a part of dialect renaming.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79844
2020-05-13 19:20:21 +02:00

111 lines
4.3 KiB
Markdown

# Background: declarative builders API
The main purpose of the declarative builders API is to provide an intuitive way
of constructing MLIR programmatically. In the majority of cases, the IR we wish
to construct exhibits structured control-flow. The Declarative builders in the
`EDSC` library (Embedded Domain Specific Constructs) provide an API to make MLIR
construction and manipulation very idiomatic, for the structured control-flow
case, in C++.
## ScopedContext
`mlir::edsc::ScopedContext` provides an implicit thread-local context,
supporting a simple declarative API with globally accessible builders. These
declarative builders are available within the lifetime of a `ScopedContext`.
## Intrinsics
`mlir::ValueBuilder` is a generic wrapper for the `mlir::OpBuilder::create`
method that operates on `Value` objects and return a single Value. For
instructions that return no values or that return multiple values, the
`mlir::edsc::OperationBuilder` can be used. Named intrinsics are provided as
syntactic sugar to further reduce boilerplate.
```c++
using load = ValueBuilder<LoadOp>;
using store = OperationBuilder<StoreOp>;
```
## LoopBuilder and AffineLoopNestBuilder
`mlir::edsc::AffineLoopNestBuilder` provides an interface to allow writing
concise and structured loop nests.
```c++
ScopedContext scope(f.get());
Value i, j, lb(f->getArgument(0)), ub(f->getArgument(1));
Value f7(std_constant_float(llvm::APFloat(7.0f), f32Type)),
f13(std_constant_float(llvm::APFloat(13.0f), f32Type)),
i7(constant_int(7, 32)),
i13(constant_int(13, 32));
AffineLoopNestBuilder(&i, lb, ub, 3)([&]{
lb * index_type(3) + ub;
lb + index_type(3);
AffineLoopNestBuilder(&j, lb, ub, 2)([&]{
ceilDiv(index_type(31) * floorDiv(i + j * index_type(3), index_type(32)),
index_type(32));
((f7 + f13) / f7) % f13 - f7 * f13;
((i7 + i13) / i7) % i13 - i7 * i13;
});
});
```
## IndexedValue
`mlir::edsc::IndexedValue` provides an index notation around load and store
operations on abstract data types by overloading the C++ assignment and
parenthesis operators. The relevant loads and stores are emitted as appropriate.
## Putting it all together
With declarative builders, it becomes fairly concise to build rank and
type-agnostic custom operations even though MLIR does not yet have generic
types. Here is what a definition of a general pointwise add looks in
Tablegen with declarative builders.
```c++
def AddOp : Op<"x.add">,
Arguments<(ins Tensor:$A, Tensor:$B)>,
Results<(outs Tensor: $C)> {
code referenceImplementation = [{
SmallVector<Value, 4> ivs(view_A.rank());
IndexedValue A(arg_A), B(arg_B), C(arg_C);
AffineLoopNestBuilder(
ivs, view_A.getLbs(), view_A.getUbs(), view_A.getSteps())([&]{
C(ivs) = A(ivs) + B(ivs)
});
}];
}
```
Depending on the function signature on which this emitter is called, the
generated IR resembles the following, for a 4-D memref of `vector<4xi8>`:
```
// CHECK-LABEL: func @t1(%lhs: memref<3x4x5x6xvector<4xi8>>, %rhs: memref<3x4x5x6xvector<4xi8>>, %result: memref<3x4x5x6xvector<4xi8>>) -> () {
// CHECK: affine.for {{.*}} = 0 to 3 {
// CHECK: affine.for {{.*}} = 0 to 4 {
// CHECK: affine.for {{.*}} = 0 to 5 {
// CHECK: affine.for {{.*}}= 0 to 6 {
// CHECK: {{.*}} = load %arg1[{{.*}}] : memref<3x4x5x6xvector<4xi8>>
// CHECK: {{.*}} = load %arg0[{{.*}}] : memref<3x4x5x6xvector<4xi8>>
// CHECK: {{.*}} = addi {{.*}} : vector<4xi8>
// CHECK: store {{.*}}, %arg2[{{.*}}] : memref<3x4x5x6xvector<4xi8>>
```
or the following, for a 0-D `memref<f32>`:
```
// CHECK-LABEL: func @t3(%lhs: memref<f32>, %rhs: memref<f32>, %result: memref<f32>) -> () {
// CHECK: {{.*}} = load %arg1[] : memref<f32>
// CHECK: {{.*}} = load %arg0[] : memref<f32>
// CHECK: {{.*}} = addf {{.*}}, {{.*}} : f32
// CHECK: store {{.*}}, %arg2[] : memref<f32>
```
Similar APIs are provided to emit the lower-level `scf.for` op with
`LoopNestBuilder`. See the `builder-api-test.cpp` test for more usage examples.
Since the implementation of declarative builders is in C++, it is also available
to program the IR with an embedded-DSL flavor directly integrated in MLIR.