two small changes to the API since last patch, which hopefully completes
the decoupling of composite function support from SRF specific support.
Joe Conway
scripts that I have been using, minus the C function tests and without
calls to random() -- figured random() wouldn't work too well for a
regression test ;-)
Joe Conway
> information and SQL language specific info wrt SRFs. I've taken to
> calling this feature "Table Fuctions" to be consistent with (at least)
> one well known RDBMS.
Joe Conway
files rather than a header file where they belong. Pay some modicum
of attention to picking global routine names that aren't likely to
conflict with surrounding applications.
Second cut attached. This one just adds a boolean option to the existing
function to indicate that implicit schemas are to be included (or not).
I remembered the docs as well this time :-)
Dave Page
I am no longer pursuing a total non-blocking implementation. I haven't
found a good way to test it with the type of work that I do with
PostgreSQL. I do use blocking SSL sockets with this mod and have had no
problem whatsoever. The bug that I fixed in this patch is exceptionally
hard to reproduce reliably.
Jack Bates
HeapTupleHeaderData in setter and getter macros called
HeapTupleHeaderGetXmin, HeapTupleHeaderSetXmin etc.
It also introduces a "virtual" field xvac by defining
HeapTupleHeaderGetXvac and HeapTupleHeaderSetXvac. Xvac is used by
VACUUM, in fact it is stored in t_cmin.
Manfred Koizar
but occasionally I may need to shut down the server and restart it
w/o tcpip sockets. Postmaster has the -i option to turn on tcpip
connections, but it wasn't immediately clear how to easily or
temporarily turn it off (when it's been enabled in postgresql.conf).
In fact, it wasn't clear to me until digging in to postmaster.c that
I could pass '-c tcpip_socket=false' or '--tcpip_socket=false'.
(And then of course when I looked more closely at the man page I
realized I'd missed the proper part of the documentation.) What I'd
been looking for is a flag that would have the opposite effect of
'-i', and it's conceivable that others will be looking for specific
flags to do the opposite of '-F' and '-S'.
I was preparing to add options to postmaster until I realized that
maybe the solution is just to add some documentation.
If you'd rather have 1 character options to accomplish this, I'd be
happy to do that-- adding those 9 lines of code is definitely within
my ability. :) (Although, the "right" letter to be the opposite of -S
isn't clear to me, since -s is already taken.)
Ron Snyder.
