c2a408840a
Introduce `let...else` Tracking issue: #87335 The trickiest part for me was enforcing the diverging else block with clear diagnostics. Perhaps the obvious solution is to expand to `let _: ! = ..`, but I decided against this because, when a "mismatched type" error is found in typeck, there is no way to trace where in the HIR the expected type originated, AFAICT. In order to pass down this information, I believe we should introduce `Expectation::LetElseNever(HirId)` or maybe add `HirId` to `Expectation::HasType`, but I left that as a future enhancement. For now, I simply assert that the block is `!` with a custom `ObligationCauseCode`, and I think this is clear enough, at least to start. The downside here is that the error points at the entire block rather than the specific expression with the wrong type. I left a todo to this effect. Overall, I believe this PR is feature-complete with regard to the RFC. |
||
---|---|---|
.. | ||
rustc | ||
rustc_apfloat | ||
rustc_arena | ||
rustc_ast | ||
rustc_ast_lowering | ||
rustc_ast_passes | ||
rustc_ast_pretty | ||
rustc_attr | ||
rustc_builtin_macros | ||
rustc_codegen_cranelift | ||
rustc_codegen_llvm | ||
rustc_codegen_ssa | ||
rustc_data_structures | ||
rustc_driver | ||
rustc_error_codes | ||
rustc_errors | ||
rustc_expand | ||
rustc_feature | ||
rustc_fs_util | ||
rustc_graphviz | ||
rustc_hir | ||
rustc_hir_pretty | ||
rustc_incremental | ||
rustc_index | ||
rustc_infer | ||
rustc_interface | ||
rustc_lexer | ||
rustc_lint | ||
rustc_lint_defs | ||
rustc_llvm | ||
rustc_macros | ||
rustc_metadata | ||
rustc_middle | ||
rustc_mir | ||
rustc_mir_build | ||
rustc_parse | ||
rustc_parse_format | ||
rustc_passes | ||
rustc_plugin_impl | ||
rustc_privacy | ||
rustc_query_impl | ||
rustc_query_system | ||
rustc_resolve | ||
rustc_save_analysis | ||
rustc_serialize | ||
rustc_session | ||
rustc_span | ||
rustc_symbol_mangling | ||
rustc_target | ||
rustc_trait_selection | ||
rustc_traits | ||
rustc_ty_utils | ||
rustc_type_ir | ||
rustc_typeck |