3a113f18f8
const_evaluatable_checked: Stop eagerly erroring in `is_const_evaluatable` Fixes #82279 We don't want to be emitting errors inside of is_const_evaluatable because we may call this during selection where it should be able to fail silently There were two errors being emitted in `is_const_evaluatable`. The one causing the compile error in #82279 was inside the match arm for `FailureKind::MentionsParam` but I moved the other error being emitted too since it made things cleaner imo The `NotConstEvaluatable` enum \*should\* have a fourth variant for when we fail to evaluate a concrete const, e.g. `0 - 1` but that cant happen until #81339 cc `@oli-obk` `@lcnr` r? `@nikomatsakis` |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| benches | ||
| src | ||
| Cargo.toml | ||
| README.md | ||
For more information about how rustc works, see the rustc dev guide.