6208: macOS: install GNU tar r=jonas-schievink a=jonas-schievink
CI runs on macOS have started to fail due to https://github.com/actions/cache/issues/403. Use GNU tar instead of BSD tar to work around that.
Co-authored-by: Jonas Schievink <jonas.schievink@ferrous-systems.com>
Co-authored-by: Jonas Schievink <jonasschievink@gmail.com>
6130: Items case quick fix (snake_case / UPPER_SNAKE_CASE / CamelCase) r=matklad a=popzxc
Resolves#4598.
After a third try, it finally works. Boy, it appeared tougher than it seemed.
Initially I thought like "Ha, `rustc` already tells us where idents are named incorrectly. It shouldn't be that hard, should it?".
Well, the problems with the information provided by `rustc` appeared shortly:
- `rustc` warnings are `flycheck` warnings, which are slightly aside from our diagnostics with fixes.
When we map flycheck diagnostic to LSP, we can convert it into a fix, but only if it's marked as `Applicability::MachineApplicable`.
Name case fix is marked `Applicability::MaybeIncorrect`, and for a reason: it only suggest to rename symbol under cursor, without tracking any references.
- Warning spawned by `rustc` are identified by string labels rather than enum. It means that if one day the diagnostic will be renamed in `rustc`, `rust-analyzer` code will still compile, but won't find the required diagnostic by name anymore. If by chance this will happen when some unlucky guy will decide to create their first pull request, they'll be confused by suddenly failing tests (likely) not related to their changes.
- Even if we'll try to build fixes atop of `rustc` warnings, we'll have to do it in the `rust_analyzer::diagnostics::to_proto` module, which is far less
convenient for that matter than `ide` crate.
That's why I decided that it's worth a separate `rust-analyzer` diagnostic, which will implement `DiagnosticWithFix` trait.
After that, I discovered that currently `hir_ty::diagnostics` only check `DefWithBody` types, like function bodies. I had to add support for diagnostics
which look at any `ModuleDef`.
And of course, since I'd added a lot of new functionality, it required extensive testing.
That explains why the diff is so big for a (looking) relatively small feature.
I hope that this PR doesn't only add a small feature, but also creates a base for building another features.
## Example:
P.S. My eyes were bleeding when I had to write the code for the example...
6135: when generating new function, focus on return type instead of body r=matklad a=bnjjj
I made a little change when we use the assist to generate a new function, instead of focusing on the function body, it will focus on return type
Co-authored-by: Igor Aleksanov <popzxc@yandex.ru>
Co-authored-by: Benjamin Coenen <5719034+bnjjj@users.noreply.github.com>
6205: Fix iterator hint shortening heuristic r=SomeoneToIgnore a=Veykril
Turns out I made a mistake with the heuristic check which is always true, so all iterators exposed from `core` were shortened, including things like ranges. 😅
Co-authored-by: Lukas Wirth <lukastw97@gmail.com>
6137: add a new TextMate grammar r=matklad a=dustypomerleau
Thanks to everyone working hard on Rust Analyzer - my impression is that it's quickly becoming the community default.
I think it would be helpful to have a more robust TextMate grammar to fall back on, for those who wish to disable semantic highlighting for any reason. It should allow theming of punctuation, and provide scopes for all tokens on the page. This can be done at zero cost to those who enable semantic highlighting, as the TextMate scopes will be invisible to those users.
I can see a couple ways of accomplishing this:
1. Ship a new grammar by merging this PR.
1. Ship no TextMate grammar at all (like the [Rust](https://marketplace.visualstudio.com/items?itemName=rust-lang.rust) extension), and allow users to install a separate extension that provides the grammar of their choice (I have released this one as [Rust Syntax](https://marketplace.visualstudio.com/items?itemName=dustypomerleau.rust-syntax)). If no grammar were installed, they would simply fall back to the default grammar provided by their editor. In the case of VS Code, the default grammar already matches what is currently being shipped, so users who choose not to override it would see no difference.
I have tried to choose sensible default scopes, in the hopes that a wider variety of themes would work out of the box with Rust, even if those themes do not yet supply scopes for semantic highlighting. There is definitely some interest in using this grammar with Rust Analyzer, as this was the very first issue after the syntax extension was shipped: https://github.com/dustypomerleau/rust-syntax/issues/1.
I considered simply using an alternative grammar alongside Rust Analyzer, but this doesn't seem possible. When RA starts, any existing grammar/extension is overridden, and I haven't been able to find a workaround.
Co-authored-by: Dusty Pomerleau <dustypomerleau@users.noreply.github.com>
6153: Improve prime_caches and display its progress r=matklad a=jonas-schievink
It now computes the `CrateDefMap` of all crates, which is generally a reasonable approximation for "IDE features ready". There is still some delay after this finishes, I suspect mostly due to impl collection, which takes a while, but this should be an improvement already.
For more accurate progress reports, this topologically sorts all crates before starting this operation. ~~Because that is also the ordering in which parallelization makes sense (which was previously attempted in https://github.com/rust-analyzer/rust-analyzer/pull/3529), I decided to throw that into the mix as well. It still doesn't provide *that* much of a performance boost, but it does scale beyond the current single-core architecture, and adding it was very easy.~~
~~Unfortunately, as written, this will not tell the user which crate is actually causing slowdowns, since the displayed crate is the last one that was *started*, not the one we are currently *blocked* on, but that seems fairly difficult to implement unless I'm missing something.~~
(I have removed rayon for now since it does not work correctly with cancellation.)
Co-authored-by: Jonas Schievink <jonas.schievink@ferrous-systems.com>
6198: Skip macro matcher fragment name semantic highlighting r=matklad a=Veykril
Implements a small state-machine for macro_rules! highlighting to separate out the matcher part of its rules. This skips semantically highlighting names of metavariables in the matcher and expander. This might even allow for more fun macro highlighting things in the future.
Fixes#4380.
Co-authored-by: Lukas Wirth <lukastw97@gmail.com>
6199: Fix `mut self` not emitting mutable binding on `self` use r=matklad a=Veykril
Prior to this, when `self` in a function is taken by value and bound mutably, its use inside of the method body won't be marked `mutably`.
Fixes#5461
Co-authored-by: Lukas Wirth <lukastw97@gmail.com>
5917: Add a command to open docs for the symbol under the cursor r=matklad a=zacps
#### Todo
- [ ] Decide if there should be a default keybind or context menu entry
- [x] Figure out how to get the documentation path for methods and other non-top-level defs
- [x] Design the protocol extension. In future we'll probably want parameters for local/remote documentation URLs, so that should maybe be done in this PR?
- [x] Code organisation
- [x] Tests
Co-authored-by: Zac Pullar-Strecker <zacmps@gmail.com>
5858: Draft: Show reason for failed rename refactoring r=rherrmann a=rherrmann
Return an error with a meaningful message for requests to
`textDocument/rename` if the operation cannot be performed.
Pass errors, raised by rename handling code to the LSP runtime.
As a consequence, the VS Code client shows and logs the request
as if a server-side programming error occured.
Screenshot of a rename error showing in VS Code
I would kindly ask to get feedback from the maintainers if they can spare the time:
* Is the general direction of the proposed changes acceptable?
* I'm new to Rust. The code feels clumsy and redundant, please suggest improvements
if you find the time for. E.g. is there a simple replacement for `RenameError`?
* Should presenting the error with proper severity (i.e. not as a programming error) be part of this change or in a followup change?
See https://github.com/rust-analyzer/rust-analyzer/issues/3981
Co-authored-by: Rüdiger Herrmann <ruediger.herrmann@gmx.de>
Return an error with a meaningful message for requests to
`textDocument/rename` if the operation cannot be performed.
Pass errors raised by rename handling code to the LSP runtime.
As a consequence, the VS Code client shows and logs the request
as if a server-side programming error occured.
Resolves https://github.com/rust-analyzer/rust-analyzer/issues/3981
