Better diagnostics with mismatched types due to implicit static lifetime
Fixes#78113
I think this is my first diagnostics PR...definitely happy to hear thoughts on the direction/implementation here.
I was originally just trying to solve the error above, where the lifetime on a GAT was causing a cryptic "mismatched types" error. But as I was writing this, I realized that this (unintentionally) also applied to a different case: `wf-in-foreign-fn-decls-issue-80468.rs`. I'm not sure if this diagnostic should get a new error code, or even reuse an existing one. And, there might be some ways to make this even more generalized. Also, the error is a bit more lengthy and verbose than probably needed. So thoughts there are welcome too.
This PR essentially ended up adding a new nice region error pass that triggers if a type doesn't match the self type of an impl which is selected because of a predicate because of an implicit static bound on that self type.
r? `@estebank`
Add clobber-only register classes for asm!
These are needed to properly express a function call ABI using a clobber
list, even though we don't support passing actual values into/out of
these registers.
These are needed to properly express a function call ABI using a clobber
list, even though we don't support passing actual values into/out of
these registers.
Implement the new desugaring from `try_trait_v2`
~~Currently blocked on https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/84782, which has a PR in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/84811~~ Rebased atop that fix.
`try_trait_v2` tracking issue: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/84277
Unfortunately this is already touching a ton of things, so if you have suggestions for good ways to split it up, I'd be happy to hear them. (The combination between the use in the library, the compiler changes, the corresponding diagnostic differences, even MIR tests mean that I don't really have a great plan for it other than trying to have decently-readable commits.
r? `@ghost`
~~(This probably shouldn't go in during the last week before the fork anyway.)~~ Fork happened.
Update BARE_TRAIT_OBJECT and ELLIPSIS_INCLUSIVE_RANGE_PATTERNS to errors in Rust 2021
This addresses https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/81244 by updating two lints to errors in the Rust 2021 edition.
r? `@estebank`
This PR modifies the macro expansion infrastructure to handle attributes
in a fully token-based manner. As a result:
* Derives macros no longer lose spans when their input is modified
by eager cfg-expansion. This is accomplished by performing eager
cfg-expansion on the token stream that we pass to the derive
proc-macro
* Inner attributes now preserve spans in all cases, including when we
have multiple inner attributes in a row.
This is accomplished through the following changes:
* New structs `AttrAnnotatedTokenStream` and `AttrAnnotatedTokenTree` are introduced.
These are very similar to a normal `TokenTree`, but they also track
the position of attributes and attribute targets within the stream.
They are built when we collect tokens during parsing.
An `AttrAnnotatedTokenStream` is converted to a regular `TokenStream` when
we invoke a macro.
* Token capturing and `LazyTokenStream` are modified to work with
`AttrAnnotatedTokenStream`. A new `ReplaceRange` type is introduced, which
is created during the parsing of a nested AST node to make the 'outer'
AST node aware of the attributes and attribute target stored deeper in the token stream.
* When we need to perform eager cfg-expansion (either due to `#[derive]` or `#[cfg_eval]`),
we tokenize and reparse our target, capturing additional information about the locations of
`#[cfg]` and `#[cfg_attr]` attributes at any depth within the target.
This is a performance optimization, allowing us to perform less work
in the typical case where captured tokens never have eager cfg-expansion run.
forbid `impl Trait` in generic param defaults
Fixes#83929
Forbid using `impl Trait` in the default types of generic parameters, e.g. `struct Foo<T = impl Trait>`. I assume this was never supposed to be allowed - it seems no UI test used it.
Note that using `impl Trait` in this position did not hit a feature gate error; however, this *shouldn't* be a breaking change as any attempt to use it should have hit the ICE in #83929 and/or failed to provide a defining use of the `impl Trait`.
