Use HTTPS links where possible
While looking at #86583, I wondered how many other (insecure) HTTP links were in `rustc`. This changes most other `http` links to `https`. While most of the links are in comments or documentation, there are a few other HTTP links that are used by CI that are changed to HTTPS.
Notes:
- I didn't change any to or in licences
- Some links don't support HTTPS :(
- Some `http` links were dead, in those cases I upgraded them to their new places (all of which used HTTPS)
Check that `#[cmse_nonsecure_entry]` is applied to a function definition
This PR fixes#83475. The compiler currently neglects to check whether `#[cmse_nonsecure_entry]` is applied to a function (and not, say, a struct) definition, leading to an ICE later on when the type checker attempts to retrieve the function signature. I have fixed this problem by adding an appropriate check to the `check_attr` pass, so that an error is reported instead of an ICE.
Rollup of 5 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #86330 (Change how edition based future compatibility warnings are handled)
- #86513 (Rustdoc: Do not list impl when trait has doc(hidden))
- #86592 (Use `#[non_exhaustive]` where appropriate)
- #86608 (chore(rustdoc): remove unused members of RenderType)
- #86624 (Update compiler-builtins)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Use `#[non_exhaustive]` where appropriate
Due to the std/alloc split, it is not possible to make `alloc::collections::TryReserveError::AllocError` non-exhaustive without having an unstable, doc-hidden method to construct (which negates the benefits from `#[non_exhaustive]`).
`@rustbot` label +C-cleanup +T-libs +S-waiting-on-review
Don't lint :pat when re-parsing a macro from another crate.
`compile_macro` is used both when compiling the original definition in the crate that defines it, and to compile the macro when loading it when compiling a crate that uses it. We should only emit lints in the first case.
This adds a `is_definition: bool` to pass this information in, so we don't warn about things that only concern the definition site.
Fixes#86567
Even if the content from box is used in a sharef-ref context,
we capture the box entirerly.
This is motivated by:
1) We only capture data that is on the stack.
2) Capturing data from within the box might end up moving more data than
the user anticipated.
Fix use placement for suggestions near main.
This fixes an edge case for the suggestion to add a `use`. When running with `--test`, the `main` function will be annotated with an `#[allow(dead_code)]` attribute. The `UsePlacementFinder` would end up using the dummy span of that synthetic attribute. If there are top-level inner attributes, this would place the `use` in the wrong position. The solution here is to ignore attributes with dummy spans.
In the process of working on this, I discovered that the `use_suggestion_placement` test was broken. `UsePlacementFinder` is unaware of active attributes. Attributes like `#[derive]` don't exist in the AST since they are removed. Fixing that is difficult, since the AST does not retain enough information. I considered trying to place the `use` towards the top of the module after any `extern crate` items, but I couldn't find a way to get a span for the start of a module block (the `mod` span starts at the `mod` keyword, and it seems tricky to find the spot just after the opening bracket and past inner attributes). For now, I just put some comments about the issue. This appears to have been a known issue in #44215 where the test for it was introduced, and the fix seemed to be deferred to later.
Due to the std/alloc split, it is not possible to make
`alloc::collections::TryReserveError::AllocError` non-exhaustive without
having an unstable, doc-hidden method to construct (which negates the
benefits from `#[non_exhaustive]`.
Permit zero non-zero-field on transparent types
Fixes#77841
This makes the transparent fields meet the below:
> * A `repr(transparent)` type `T` must meet the following rules:
> * It may have any number of 1-ZST fields
> * In addition, it may have at most one other field of type U
r? `@nikomatsakis`
Support lowercase error codes in `--explain`
This enables `rustc --explain` to accept a lowercase error code. Thus, for instance, `rustc --explain e0573` would be valid after this change, where before a user would have needed to do `rustc --explain E0573`. Although the upper case form of an error code is canonical, the user may prefer the easier-to-type lowercase form, and there's nothing to be gained by forcing them to type the upper case version.
Resolves#86518.
Error code cleanup and enforce checks
Fixes#86097.
It now checks if an error code is unused, and if so, will report an error if the error code wasn't commented out in the `error_codes.rs` file. It also checks that the constant used in the tidy check is up-to-date.
r? `@Mark-Simulacrum`
Check whether the closure's owner is an ADT in thir-unsafeck
This pull request fixes#85871. The code in `rustc_mir_build/src/check_unsafety.rs` incorrectly assumes that a closure's owner always has a body, but only functions, closures, and constants have bodies, whereas a closure can also appear inside a struct or enum:
```rust
struct S {
arr: [(); match || 1 { _ => 42 }]
}
enum E {
A([(); { || 1; 42 }])
}
```
This pull request fixes the resulting ICE by checking whether the closure's owner is an ADT and only deferring to `thir_check_unsafety(owner)` if it isn't.
Better errors for Debug and Display traits
Currently, if someone tries to pass value that does not implement `Debug` or `Display` to a formatting macro, they get a very verbose and confusing error message. This PR changes the error messages for missing `Debug` and `Display` impls to be less overwhelming in this case, as suggested by #85844. I was a little less aggressive in changing the error message than that issue proposed. Still, this implementation would be enough to reduce the number of messages to be much more manageable.
After this PR, information on the cause of an error involving a `Debug` or `Display` implementation would suppressed if the requirement originated within a standard library macro. My reasoning was that errors originating from within a macro are confusing when they mention details that the programmer can't see, and this is particularly problematic for `Debug` and `Display`, which are most often used via macros. It is possible that either a broader or a narrower criterion would be better. I'm quite open to any feedback.
Fixes#85844.
Rollup of 6 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #86223 (Specify the kind of the item for E0121)
- #86521 (Add comments around code where ordering is important due for panic-safety)
- #86523 (Improvements to intra-doc link macro disambiguators)
- #86542 (Line numbers aligned with content)
- #86549 (Add destructuring example of E0508)
- #86557 (Update books)
Failed merges:
- #86548 (Fix crate filter search reset)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Re-add support for parsing (and pretty-printing) inner-attributes in match body
Re-add support for parsing (and pretty-printing) inner-attributes within body of a `match`.
In other words, we can do `match EXPR { #![inner_attr] ARM_1 ARM_2 ... }` again.
I believe this unbreaks the only four crates that crater flagged as broken by PR #83312.
(I am putting this up so that the lang-team can check it out and decide whether it changes their mind about what to do regarding PR #83312.)
Fix emit path hashing
With `--emit KIND=PATH`, the PATH should not affect hashes used for dependency tracking. It does not with other ways of specifying output paths (`-o` or `--out-dir`).
Also updates `rustc -Zls` to print more info about crates, which is used here to implement a `run-make` test.
It seems there was already a test explicitly checking that `OutputTypes` hash *is* affected by the path. I think this behaviour is wrong, so I updated the test.
Disambiguate between SourceFiles from different crates even if they have the same path
This PR fixes an ICE that can occur when the compiler encounters a source file that is part of both the local crate and an upstream crate:
1. While importing source files from an upstream crate the compiler creates a `SourceFile` entry for `foo.rs` in the `SourceMap`. Since this is an imported source file its `src` field is `None`.
2. At a later point the parser encounters `foo.rs` again. It tells the `SourceMap` to load the file but because we already have an entry for `foo.rs` the `SourceMap` will return the existing version with `src == None`.
3. The parser proceeds under the assumption that `src.is_some()` and panics when actually trying to use the file's contents.
This PR fixes the issue by adding the source file's associated `CrateNum` to the `SourceMap`'s interning key. As a consequence the two instances of the file will each have a separate entry in the `SourceMap`. They just happen to share the same file path. This approach seemed less problematic to me than trying to mutate the `SourceFile` after it had already been created.
Another, more involved, approach might be to merge the `src` and the `external_src` field.
Fixes#85955
Fix `unused_unsafe` around `await`
Enables `unused_unsafe` lint for `unsafe { future.await }`.
The existing test for this is `unsafe { println!() }`, so I assume that `println!` used to contain compiler-generated unsafe but this is no longer true, and so the existing test is broken. I replaced the test with `unsafe { ...await }`. I believe `await` is currently the only instance of compiler-generated unsafe.
Reverts some parts of #85421, but the issue predates that PR.
Add `future_prelude_collision` lint
Implements #84594. (RFC rust-lang/rfcs#3114 ([rendered](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/blob/master/text/3114-prelude-2021.md))) Not entirely complete but wanted to have my progress decently available while I finish off the last little bits.
Things left to implement:
* [x] UI tests for lints
* [x] Only emit lint for 2015 and 2018 editions
* [ ] Lint name/message bikeshedding
* [x] Implement for `FromIterator` (from best I can tell, the current approach as mentioned from [this comment](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/84594#issuecomment-847288288) won't work due to `FromIterator` instances not using dot-call syntax, but if I'm correct about this then that would also need to be fixed for `TryFrom`/`TryInto`)*
* [x] Add to `rust-2021-migration` group? (See #85512) (added to `rust-2021-compatibility` group)
* [ ] Link to edition guide in lint docs
*edit: looked into it, `lookup_method` will also not be hit for `TryFrom`/`TryInto` for non-dotcall syntax. If anyone who is more familiar with typecheck knows the equivalent for looking up associated functions, feel free to chime in.
Rollup of 11 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #85054 (Revert SGX inline asm syntax)
- #85182 (Move `available_concurrency` implementation to `sys`)
- #86037 (Add `io::Cursor::{remaining, remaining_slice, is_empty}`)
- #86114 (Reopen#79692 (Format symbols under shared frames))
- #86297 (Allow to pass arguments to rustdoc-gui tool)
- #86334 (Resolve type aliases to the type they point to in intra-doc links)
- #86367 (Fix comment about rustc_inherit_overflow_checks in abs().)
- #86381 (Add regression test for issue #39161)
- #86387 (Remove `#[allow(unused_lifetimes)]` which is now unnecessary)
- #86398 (Add regression test for issue #54685)
- #86493 (Say "this enum variant takes"/"this struct takes" instead of "this function takes")
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Say "this enum variant takes"/"this struct takes" instead of "this function takes"
This makes error messages for functions with incorrect argument counts adapt if they refer to a struct or enum variant:
```
error[E0061]: this enum variant takes 1 argument but 0 arguments were supplied
--> $DIR/struct-enum-wrong-args.rs:7:13
|
LL | let _ = Ok();
| ^^-- supplied 0 arguments
| |
| expected 1 argument
error[E0061]: this struct takes 1 argument but 0 arguments were supplied
--> $DIR/struct-enum-wrong-args.rs:8:13
|
LL | let _ = Wrapper();
| ^^^^^^^-- supplied 0 arguments
| |
| expected 1 argument
```
Fixes#86481.
Add MIR pass to lower call to `core::slice::len` into `Len` operand
During some larger experiment with range analysis I've found that code like `let l = slice.len()` produces different MIR then one found in bound checks. This optimization pass replaces terminators that are calls to `core::slice::len` with just a MIR operand and Goto terminator.
It uses some heuristics to remove the outer borrow that is made to call `core::slice::len`, but I assume it can be eliminated, just didn't find how.
Would like to express my gratitude to `@oli-obk` who helped me a lot on Zullip
Emit warnings for unused fields in custom targets.
Add a warning which lists any fields in a custom target `json` file that aren't used. Currently unrecognized fields are ignored so, for example, a typo in the `json` will silently produce a target which isn't the one intended.
Do not emit alloca for ZST locals with multiple assignments
This extends 35566bfd7d to additionally stop emitting unnecessary allocas for zero sized locals that are assigned multiple times.
When rebuilding the standard library with `-Zbuild-std` this reduces the number of locals that require an allocation from 62315 to 61767.
Replace some `std::iter::repeat` with `str::repeat`
I noticed that there were some instances where `std::iter::repeat` would be used to repeat a string or a char to take a specific count of it and then collect it into a `String` when `str::repeat` is actually much faster and better for that.
See also: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/7260.
