The `Option<Module>` version is supported for the case where we don't know whether the `DefId` refers to a module or not.
Non-local traits and enums are also correctly found now.
Make `Duration` respect `width` when formatting using `Debug`
When printing or writing a `std::time::Duration` using `Debug` formatting, it previously completely ignored any specified `width`. This is unlike types like integers and floats, which do pad to `width`, for both `Display` and `Debug`, though not all types consider `width` in their `Debug` output (see e.g. #30164). Curiously, `Duration`'s `Debug` formatting *did* consider `precision`.
This PR makes `Duration` pad to `width` just like integers and floats, so that
```rust
format!("|{:8?}|", Duration::from_millis(1234))
```
returns
```
|1.234s |
```
Before you ask "who formats `Debug` output?", note that `Duration` doesn't actually implement `Display`, so `Debug` is currently the only way to format `Duration`s. I think that's wrong, and `Duration` should get a `Display` implementation, but in the meantime there's no harm in making the `Debug` formatting respect `width` rather than ignore it.
I chose the default alignment to be left-aligned. The general rule Rust uses is: numeric types are right-aligned by default, non-numeric types left-aligned. It wasn't clear to me whether `Duration` is a numeric type or not. The fact that a formatted `Duration` can end with suffixes of variable length (`"s"`, `"ms"`, `"µs"`, etc.) made me lean towards left-alignment, but it would be trivial to change it.
Fixes issue #88059.
Temporarily rename int_roundings functions to avoid conflicts
These functions are unstable, but because they're inherent they still
introduce conflicts with stable trait functions in crates. Temporarily
rename them to fix these conflicts, until we can resolve those conflicts
in a better way.
Run `no_core` rustdoc tests only on Linux
I don't think this is really worth investigating further so I just disabled them.
They currently fail like this:
```
error: linking with `cc` failed: exit status: 1
|
= note: "cc" "-Wl,-exported_symbols_list,/var/folders/pg/gjhzdz7n361f0pv665d0723w0000gn/T/rustcPUsMpx/list" "-arch" "arm64" "/Users/hans/dev/rust/build/aarch64-apple-darwin/test/rustdoc/intra-doc/prim-methods-external-core/auxiliary/my-core.my_core.9f3c60de-cgu.0.rcgu.o" "/Users/hans/dev/rust/build/aarch64-apple-darwin/test/rustdoc/intra-doc/prim-methods-external-core/auxiliary/my-core.50fu2g9urkmisdsg.rcgu.o" "-L" "/Users/hans/dev/rust/build/aarch64-apple-darwin/native/rust-test-helpers" "-L" "/Users/hans/dev/rust/build/aarch64-apple-darwin/test/rustdoc/intra-doc/prim-methods-external-core/auxiliary" "-L" "/Users/hans/dev/rust/build/aarch64-apple-darwin/stage1/lib/rustlib/aarch64-apple-darwin/lib" "-L" "/Users/hans/dev/rust/build/aarch64-apple-darwin/stage1/lib/rustlib/aarch64-apple-darwin/lib" "-o" "/Users/hans/dev/rust/build/aarch64-apple-darwin/test/rustdoc/intra-doc/prim-methods-external-core/auxiliary/libmy_core.dylib" "-Wl,-dead_strip" "-dynamiclib" "-Wl,-dylib" "-Wl,-install_name" "-Wl,``@rpath/libmy_core.dylib"`` "-nodefaultlibs"
= note: ld: dynamic main executables must link with libSystem.dylib for architecture arm64
clang: error: linker command failed with exit code 1 (use -v to see invocation)
```
r? ``@jyn514``
Add a better error message for #39364
There is a known bug in the implementation of mpsc channels in rust.
This adds a clearer error message when the bug occurs, so that developers don't lose too much time looking for the origin of the bug.
See https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/39364
Revise never type fallback algorithm
This is a rebase of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/84573, but dropping the stabilization of never type (and the accompanying large test diff).
Each commit builds & has tests updated alongside it, and could be reviewed in a more or less standalone fashion. But it may make more sense to review the PR as a whole, I'm not sure. It should be noted that tests being updated isn't really a good indicator of final behavior -- never_type_fallback is not enabled by default in this PR, so we can't really see the full effects of the commits here.
This combines the work by Niko, which is [documented in this gist](https://gist.github.com/nikomatsakis/7a07b265dc12f5c3b3bd0422018fa660), with some additional rules largely derived to target specific known patterns that regress with the algorithm solely derived by Niko. We build these from an intuition that:
* In general, fallback to `()` is *sound* in all cases
* But, in general, we *prefer* fallback to `!` as it accepts more code, particularly that written to intentionally use `!` (e.g., Result's with a Infallible/! variant).
When evaluating Niko's proposed algorithm, we find that there are certain cases where fallback to `!` leads to compilation failures in real-world code, and fallback to `()` fixes those errors. In order to allow for stabilization, we need to fix a good portion of these patterns.
The final rule set this PR proposes is that, by default, we fallback from `?T` to `!`, with the following exceptions:
1. `?T: Foo` and `Bar::Baz = ?T` and `(): Foo`, then fallback to `()`
2. Per [Niko's algorithm](https://gist.github.com/nikomatsakis/7a07b265dc12f5c3b3bd0422018fa660#proposal-fallback-chooses-between--and--based-on-the-coercion-graph), the "live" `?T` also fallback to `()`.
The first rule is necessary to address a fairly common pattern which boils down to something like the snippet below. Without rule 1, we do not see the closure's return type as needing a () fallback, which leads to compilation failure.
```rust
#![feature(never_type_fallback)]
trait Bar { }
impl Bar for () { }
impl Bar for u32 { }
fn foo<R: Bar>(_: impl Fn() -> R) {}
fn main() {
foo(|| panic!());
}
```
r? `@jackh726`
Currently, with the new 2021 edition, if a closure captures all of the
fields of an upvar, we'll drop those fields in the order they are used
within the closure instead of the normal drop order (the definition
order of the fields in the type).
This changes that so we sort the captured fields by the definition order
which causes them to drop in that same order as well.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/project-rfc-2229/issues/42
Lazy TAIT preparation cleanups
Check that TAIT generics are fully generic in mir typeck instead of wf-check, as wf-check can by definition only check TAIT in return position and not account for TAITs defined in the body of the function
r? `@spastorino` `@nikomatsakis`
Don't lint `suspicious_else_formatting` inside proc-macros
fixes: #7650
I'll add a test for this one soon.
changelog: Don't lint `suspicious_else_formatting` inside proc-macros
fix non_blanket_impls iteration order
We sometimes iterate over all `non_blanket_impls`, not sure if this is observable outside
of error messages (i.e. as incremental bugs). This should fix the underlying issue of #86986.
second attempt of #88718
r? `@nikomatsakis`
