Commit graph

152 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
John Kugelman
68b0d86294 Add #[must_use] to remaining core functions 2021-10-30 18:21:29 -04:00
Jubilee
99e6e3ff07
Rollup merge of #87993 - kornelski:try_reserve_stable, r=joshtriplett
Stabilize try_reserve

Stabilization PR for the [`try_reserve` feature](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/48043#issuecomment-898040475).
2021-10-04 21:12:33 -07:00
Jubilee
e1478d650d
Rollup merge of #89443 - cuviper:btree-hash-len, r=dtolnay
Include the length in BTree hashes

This change makes it consistent with `Hash` for all other collections.
2021-10-04 13:58:11 -07:00
Kornel
00152d8977 Stabilize try_reserve 2021-10-04 10:29:46 +01:00
Josh Stone
d6fde80cb4 Include the length in BTree hashes
This change makes it consistent with `Hash` for all other collections.
2021-10-01 12:29:09 -07:00
The8472
2c6e67105e implement advance_(back_)_by on more iterators 2021-09-30 21:23:28 +02:00
Maybe Waffle
71e2eacc7b Stabilize Iterator::map_while 2021-09-17 19:42:46 +03:00
Mara Bos
5878780e64
Rollup merge of #88040 - nbdd0121:btreemap, r=m-ou-se
BTree: remove Ord bound from new

`K: Ord` bound is unnecessary on `BTree{Map,Set}::new` and their `Default` impl. No elements exist so there are nothing to compare anyway, so I don't think "future proof" would be a blocker here. This is analogous to `HashMap::new` not having a `K: Eq + Hash` bound.

#79245 originally does this and for some reason drops the change to `new` and `Default`. I can see why changes to other methods like `entry` or `symmetric_difference` need to be careful but I couldn't find out any reason not to do it on `new`.

Removing the bound also makes the stabilisation of `const fn new` not depending on const trait bounds.

cc `@steffahn` who suggests me to make this PR.

r? `@dtolnay`
2021-09-01 09:23:23 +02:00
est31
8f7007991e Fix grammar 2021-08-24 17:56:39 +02:00
Gary Guo
f33f266a8a BTree: remove Ord bound from new 2021-08-18 03:55:36 +01:00
Deadbeef
b5afa6807b
Constified Default implementations
The libs-api team agrees to allow const_trait_impl to appear in the
standard library as long as stable code cannot be broken (they are
properly gated) this means if the compiler teams thinks it's okay, then
it's okay.

My priority on constifying would be:

	1. Non-generic impls (e.g. Default) or generic impls with no
	   bounds
	2. Generic functions with bounds (that use const impls)
	3. Generic impls with bounds
	4. Impls for traits with associated types

For people opening constification PRs: please cc me and/or oli-obk.
2021-08-17 07:15:54 +00:00
Mara Bos
fa4edcc851
Rollup merge of #88030 - fee1-dead:fixme, r=oli-obk
Assign FIXMEs to me and remove obsolete ones

Also fixed capitalization of documentation

We also don't need to transform predicates to be non-const since we basically ignore const predicates in non-const contexts.

r? `````@oli-obk`````
2021-08-16 23:37:30 +02:00
bors
40db258731 Auto merge of #87974 - steffahn:slice_split_size_hints, r=dtolnay
Test and fix `size_hint` for slice’s [r]split* iterators

Adds extensive test (of `size_hint`) for all the _[r]split*_ iterators.
Fixes `size_hint` upper bound for _split_inclusive*_ iterators which was one higher than necessary for non-empty slices.
Fixes `size_hint` lower bound for _[r]splitn*_ iterators when _n == 0_, which was one too high.

**Lower bound being one too high was a logic error, violating the correctness condition of `size_hint`.**

_Edit:_ I’ve opened an issue for that bug, so this PR fixes #87978
2021-08-15 04:48:42 +00:00
Deadbeef
f25d2bd53b
Assign FIXMEs to me and remove obsolete ones
Also fixed capitalization of documentation
2021-08-14 16:48:01 +00:00
Frank Steffahn
3f0d04e97b Improve wording, correct -> tight. 2021-08-13 15:27:30 +02:00
Frank Steffahn
4304686049 Consistent use of impl Trait arguments in the test's helper function. 2021-08-13 12:02:35 +02:00
Deadbeef
8c2a1e8e43
allow incomplete features for now 2021-08-13 09:28:52 +00:00
Deadbeef
7ea0280aa9
Moved ui test 2021-08-13 09:28:51 +00:00
Frank Steffahn
0bb11f43f6 Rewrite test from previous commit but without using macros. 2021-08-12 23:11:19 +02:00
Frank Steffahn
31e49f0272 Test and fix size_hint for slice's [r]split* iterators
Adds extensive test for all the [r]split* iterators.
Fixes size_hint upper bound for split_inclusive* iterators which was one higher than necessary for non-empty slices.
Fixes size_hint lower bound for [r]splitn* iterators when n==0, which was one too high.
2021-08-12 17:26:03 +02:00
Kornel
7dca8eb565 Use assert_matches! instead of if let {} else 2021-08-07 14:48:27 +01:00
bors
996ff2e0a0 Auto merge of #87408 - kornelski:try_reserve_error, r=yaahc
Hide allocator details from TryReserveError

I think there's [no need for TryReserveError to carry detailed information](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/48043#issuecomment-825139280), but I wouldn't want that issue to delay stabilization of the `try_reserve` feature.

So I'm proposing to stabilize `try_reserve` with a `TryReserveError` as an opaque structure, and if needed, expose error details later.

This PR moves the `enum` to an unstable inner `TryReserveErrorKind` that lives under a separate feature flag. `TryReserveErrorKind` could possibly be left as an implementation detail forever, and the `TryReserveError` get methods such as `allocation_size() -> Option<usize>` or `layout() -> Option<Layout>` instead, or the details could be dropped completely to make try-reserve errors just a unit struct, and thus smaller and cheaper.
2021-08-07 01:26:15 +00:00
Ali Malik
e43254aad1 Fix may not to appropriate might not or must not 2021-07-29 01:15:20 -04:00
Kornel
a294aa8d3d Hide allocator details from TryReserveError 2021-07-24 22:25:08 +01:00
Alexis Bourget
cd04731d3a Add test for the fix 2021-07-11 17:47:57 +02:00
hi-rustin
88abd7d81d Lint for unused borrows as part of UNUSED_MUST_USE 2021-06-18 15:09:40 +08:00
Yuki Okushi
f923f73b9a
Rollup merge of #85930 - mominul:array_into_iter, r=m-ou-se
Update standard library for IntoIterator implementation of arrays

This PR partially resolves issue #84513 of updating the standard library part.

I haven't found any remaining doctest examples which are using iterators over e.g. &i32 instead of just i32 in the standard library. Can anyone point me to them if there's remaining any?

Thanks!

r? ```@m-ou-se```
2021-06-06 19:11:19 +09:00
SOFe
f7c283c160 Stabilize vecdeque_binary_search 2021-06-02 20:50:15 +02:00
Muhammad Mominul Huque
507d97b26e Update expressions where we can use array's IntoIterator implementation 2021-06-02 16:09:04 +06:00
Dylan DPC
27899e3887
Rollup merge of #85625 - SkiFire13:fix-85613-vec-dedup-drop-panics, r=nagisa
Prevent double drop in `Vec::dedup_by` if a destructor panics

Fixes #85613
2021-05-26 13:32:06 +02:00
Giacomo Stevanato
c9595faa28 Make Vec::dedup panicking test actually detect double panics 2021-05-24 12:42:04 +02:00
David Tolnay
c441675edf
Add Weak may_dangle tests 2021-05-20 19:42:29 -07:00
the8472
7cb4e5180f from review: more robust test
This also checks the contents and not only the capacity in case IntoIter's clone implementation is changed to add capacity at the end. Extra capacity at the beginning would be needed to make InPlaceIterable work.

Co-authored-by: Giacomo Stevanato <giaco.stevanato@gmail.com>
2021-05-19 01:41:12 +02:00
The8472
a44a059c3b add regression test 2021-05-19 01:41:12 +02:00
The8472
60a900ee10 remove InPlaceIterable marker from Peekable due to unsoundness
The unsoundness is not in Peekable per se, it rather is due to the
interaction between Peekable being able to hold an extra item
and vec::IntoIter's clone implementation shortening the allocation.

An alternative solution would be to change IntoIter's clone implementation
to keep enough spare capacity available.
2021-05-19 01:41:09 +02:00
Amanieu d'Antras
22951b7f56 Stabilize vec_extend_from_within 2021-04-28 07:27:06 +01:00
Mara Bos
f5d72ab69b Add better test for BinaryHeap::retain. 2021-04-22 14:24:30 +02:00
Vojtech Kral
e68680d30d VecDeque: Add partition_point() #78021 2021-04-15 23:23:23 +02:00
Dylan DPC
b943ea8cdc
Rollup merge of #83827 - the8472:fix-inplace-panic-on-drop, r=RalfJung
cleanup leak after test to make miri happy

Contains changes that were requested in #83629 but didn't make it into the rollup.

r? `````@RalfJung`````
2021-04-04 19:20:06 +02:00
Dylan DPC
869726d335
Rollup merge of #81619 - SkiFire13:resultshunt-inplace, r=the8472
Implement `SourceIterator` and `InPlaceIterable` for `ResultShunt`
2021-04-04 19:19:59 +02:00
the8472
572873fce0
suggestion from review
Co-authored-by: Ralf Jung <post@ralfj.de>
2021-04-04 01:38:58 +02:00
The8472
3bd241f95b cleanup leak after test to make miri happy 2021-04-04 01:37:05 +02:00
Dylan DPC
542f441d44
Rollup merge of #83629 - the8472:fix-inplace-panic-on-drop, r=m-ou-se
Fix double-drop in `Vec::from_iter(vec.into_iter())` specialization when items drop during panic

This fixes the double-drop but it leaves a behavioral difference compared to the default implementation intact: In the default implementation the source and the destination vec are separate objects, so they get dropped separately. Here they share an allocation and the latter only exists as a pointer into the former. So if dropping the former panics then this fix will leak more items than the default implementation would. Is this acceptable or should the specialization also mimic the default implementation's drops-during-panic behavior?

Fixes #83618

`@rustbot` label T-libs-impl
2021-04-02 19:57:31 +02:00
Dylan DPC
2843baaeb6
Rollup merge of #82331 - frol:feat/std-binary-heap-as-slice, r=Amanieu
alloc: Added `as_slice` method to `BinaryHeap` collection

I initially asked about whether it is useful addition on https://internals.rust-lang.org/t/should-i-add-as-slice-method-to-binaryheap/13816, and it seems there were no objections, so went ahead with this PR.

> There is [`BinaryHeap::into_vec`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/collections/struct.BinaryHeap.html#method.into_vec), but it consumes the value. I wonder if there is API design limitation that should be taken into account. Implementation-wise, the inner buffer is just a Vec, so it is trivial to expose as_slice from it.

Please, guide me through if I need to add tests or something else.

UPD: Tracking issue #83659
2021-03-30 00:32:18 +02:00
The8472
fa89c0fbcf add testcase for double-drop during Vec in-place collection 2021-03-29 04:39:23 +02:00
bors
5208f63ba8 Auto merge of #81728 - Qwaz:fix-80335, r=joshtriplett
Fixes API soundness issue in join()

Fixes #80335
2021-03-28 06:32:34 +00:00
bors
aef11409b4 Auto merge of #78618 - workingjubilee:ieee754-fmt, r=m-ou-se
Add IEEE 754 compliant fmt/parse of -0, infinity, NaN

This pull request improves the Rust float formatting/parsing libraries to comply with IEEE 754's formatting expectations around certain special values, namely signed zero, the infinities, and NaN. It also adds IEEE 754 compliance tests that, while less stringent in certain places than many of the existing flt2dec/dec2flt capability tests, are intended to serve as the beginning of a roadmap to future compliance with the standard. Some relevant documentation is also adjusted with clarifying remarks.

This PR follows from discussion in https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/issues/1074, and closes #24623.

The most controversial change here is likely to be that -0 is now printed as -0. Allow me to explain: While there appears to be community support for an opt-in toggle of printing floats as if they exist in the naively expected domain of numbers, i.e. not the extended reals (where floats live), IEEE 754-2019 is clear that a float converted to a string should be capable of being transformed into the original floating point bit-pattern when it satisfies certain conditions (namely, when it is an actual numeric value i.e. not a NaN and the original and destination float width are the same). -0 is given special attention here as a value that should have its sign preserved. In addition, the vast majority of other programming languages not only output `-0` but output `-0.0` here.

While IEEE 754 offers a broad leeway in how to handle producing what it calls a "decimal character sequence", it is clear that the operations a language provides should be capable of round tripping, and it is confusing to advertise the f32 and f64 types as binary32 and binary64 yet have the most basic way of producing a string and then reading it back into a floating point number be non-conformant with the standard. Further, existing documentation suggested that e.g. -0 would be printed with -0 regardless of the presence of the `+` fmt character, but it prints "+0" instead if given such (which was what led to the opening of #24623).

There are other parsing and formatting issues for floating point numbers which prevent Rust from complying with the standard, as well as other well-documented challenges on the arithmetic level, but I hope that this can be the beginning of motion towards solving those challenges.
2021-03-27 10:40:16 +00:00
Ömer Sinan Ağacan
819247f179 Update char::escape_debug_ext to handle different escapes in strings vs. chars
Fixes #83046

The program

    fn main() {
        println!("{:?}", '"');
        println!("{:?}", "'");
    }

would previously print

    '\"'
    "\'"

With this patch it now prints:

    '"'
    "'"
2021-03-26 11:23:51 +03:00
Mara Bos
81932be5e7 Revert "Revert stabilizing integer::BITS." 2021-03-24 22:34:36 +01:00
Jubilee Young
74db93ed2d Preserve signed zero on roundtrip
This commit removes the previous mechanism of differentiating
between "Debug" and "Display" formattings for the sign of -0 so as
to comply with the IEEE 754 standard's requirements on external
character sequences preserving various attributes of a floating
point representation.

In addition, numerous tests are fixed.
2021-03-22 17:02:09 -07:00