If I understand it correctly, we were first creating a type with a
`RegionKind::ReErased` region and then deleted it again in
`util::implements_trait` with:
cx.tcx.erase_regions(&ty);
causing the type query to fail.
It looks like using `ReEmpty` works around that deletion.
Fix `cast_sign_loss` false positive
This checks if the value is a non-negative constant before linting about
losing the sign.
Because the `constant` function doesn't handle const functions, we check if
the value is from a call to a `max_value` function directly. A utility method
called `get_def_path` was added to make checking for the function paths
easier.
Fixes#2728
Adding lint test for excessive LOC.
This is a WIP for #2377. Just wanted to pull in because I had a few questions:
1. Is it okay that I'm approaching this via counting by looking at each line in the snippet instead of looking at the AST tree? If there's another way to do it, I want to make sure I'm doing the correct way, but I wasn't sure since the output AST JSON doesn't seem to contain whitespace.
2. My function is definitely going to trigger the lint, so also wanted to see if there was something obvious I could do to reduce it.
3. Are the two tests fine, or is there something obvious I'm missing?
4. Obviously bigger question - am I approaching the line count correctly. Current strategy is count a line if it contains some code, so skip if it's just comments or empty.
`hir::Ty` doesn't seem to know anything about type bounds and
`cx.tcx.type_of(def_id)` caused an ICE when it was passed a generic type
with a bound:
```
src/librustc_typeck/collect.rs:1311: unexpected non-type Node::GenericParam: Type { default: None, synthetic: None }
```
Converting it to a proper `Ty` fixes the ICE and catches a few more
places where the lint applies.
This checks if the value is a non-negative constant before linting about
losing the sign.
Because the `constant` function doesn't handle const functions, we check if
the value is from a call to a `max_value` function directly. A utility method
called `get_def_path` was added to make checking for the function paths
easier.
Fixes#2728
Add initial version of const_fn lint
This adds an initial version of a lint that can tell if a function could be `const`.
TODO:
- [x] Finish up the docs
- [x] Fix the ICE
cc #2440
Prevent incorrect cast_lossless suggestion in const_fn
`::from` is not a const fn, so applying the suggestion of
`cast_lossless` would fail to compile. The fix is to skip the lint if
the cast is found inside a const fn.
Fixes#3656
`::from` is not a const fn, so applying the suggestion of
`cast_lossless` would fail to compile. The fix is to skip the lint if
the cast is found inside a const fn.
* master: (58 commits)
Rustfmt all the things
Don't make decisions on values that don't represent the decision
Improving comments.
Rustup
Added rustfix to the test.
Improve span shortening.
Added "make_return" and "blockify" convenience methods in Sugg and used them in "needless_bool".
Actually check for constants.
Fixed potential mistakes with nesting. Added tests.
formatting fix
Update clippy_lints/src/needless_bool.rs
formatting fix
Fixing typo in CONTRIBUTING.md
Fix breakage due to rust-lang/rust#57651
needless bool lint suggestion is wrapped in brackets if it is an "else" clause of an "if-else" statement
Fix automatic suggestion on `use_self`.
Remove negative integer literal checks.
Fix `implicit_return` false positives.
Run rustfmt
Fixed breakage due to rust-lang/rust#57489
...
Fix automatic suggestion on `use_self`.
In an example like this:
```rust
impl Example {
fn fun_1() { }
fn fun_2() {
Example::fun_1();
}
}
```
Clippy tries to replace `Example::fun_1` with `Self`, loosing `::fun_1` in the process, it should rather try to replace `Example` with `Self`.
**Question**
- There may be other paths that need the same treatment, but I'm not sure I understand them fully:
- e648adf086/clippy_lints/src/use_self.rs (L94-L96)
- e648adf086/clippy_lints/src/use_self.rs (L225-L229)
Fix `implicit_return` false positives.
Fixes the following false positives:
- linting on `if let` without `else` in a `loop` even with a present `return`
- linting on `unreachable!()`
Catch up with `format_args` change
Catches up with a change in rust-lang/rust#57537. (Since the optimization is optional, this clippy PR can be merged before the rustc PR.)
Happened to fix a bug in `expect_fun_call`, that is the lint ignores more than
one arguments to `format`.
```
warning: use of `expect` followed by a function call
--> src/main.rs:2:17
|
2 | Some("foo").expect(format!("{} {}", 1, 2).as_ref());
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `unwrap_or_else(|| panic!("{} {}", 1))`
|
```
Catches up with a change in rust-lang/rust#57537
Happened to fix a bug in `expect_fun_call`, that is the lint ignores more than
one arguments to `format`.
`cloned` requires that the elements of the iterator must be references. This
change determines if that is the case by examining the type of the closure
argument and suggesting `.cloned` only if it is a reference. When the closure
argument is not a reference, it suggests removing the `map` call instead.
A minor problem with this change is that the new check sometimes overlaps
with the `clone_on_copy` lint.
Fixes#498
Restrict `use_self` on nested items
Fixes#3637Fixes#3463
These changes make it so that nested items aren't visited any more by the `use_self` lint.
I think visiting nested items should be possible (so that it uses a different `item_path` for the nested item), but I'm not sure whether it's viable and what the best approach would be.
- Can `item_path` be changed to a new `Self` path before visiting the item, and then changing it back afterwards?
- Alternatively, could a new visitor be created, re-using `check_trait_method_impl_decl`?
Revert the random_state lint.
Remove the random_state lint until it or rustc has been fixed to no longer crash with debug assertions (see #3628)
We can't update clippy in the rustc repo because of this which is blocking nightlies because toolstate is already broken.
fixes#3628
Add run-rustfix where it already works
This PR adds `// run-rustfix` headers to tests for `MachineApplicable` lints where
applying the suggestions works without any errors.
Trigger `use_self` lint in local macros
Closes#2098
The test currently only covers local macros. #2098 suggested this:
> You could add the macro in question into the `mini_macro` subcrate
But that doesn't work for a `macro_rules`:
```
error: cannot export macro_rules! macros from a `proc-macro` crate type currently
```
So I suggest leaving out the test for external macros, as using `in_external_macro` seems straigtforward enough. Alternatives would be to use to add an additional crate (overkill if you ask me), or test with a `proc-macro`.
UI test cleanup: Extract lint from methods.rs test
Extracts the `result_map_unwrap_or_else` lint into a separate test file.
This also extracts the `IteratorFalsePositives` struct and impl into
`auxiliary/option_helpers.rs`.
cc #2038
Integrate rustfix into Clippy test suite
Once the [PR to compiletest-rs](https://github.com/laumann/compiletest-rs/pull/151) is reviewed and merged this fixes#2376.
I will create a separate tracking issue for adding `run-rustfix` to all tests.
Only trigger `infinite_iter` lint for infinitely allocating `collect()` calls
Fixes #3538
~Oh, I guess this should actually check other methods like `count` as well, not only `collect()`.~
Never mind, `collect` is the only of these functions that allocates a data structure.
Fix if_same_then_else false positive
This fixes false positive in #3559.
The problem was that `SpanlessEq` does not check patterns in declarations. So this two blocks considered equal.
```rust
if true {
let (x, y) = foo();
} else {
let (y, x) = foo();
}
```
Not sure if the proposed change is safe as `SpanlessEq` is used extensively in other lints, but I tried hard to come up with counterexample and failed.
Merge new_without_default_derive into new_without_default
Closes#3525, deprecating new_without_default_derive and moving both lints into new_without_default.
Teach `suspicious_else_formatting` about `if .. {..} {..}`
We essentially treat bare blocks `{..}` identically to `if .. {..}`, except for different lint messages.
Fixes#3044
There is no map_unit_fn.rs whose output would be diffed with map_unit_fn.stderr
map_unit_fn.stderr was renamed 8 months ago from option_map_unit_fn.stderr
but option_map_unit_fn.{stderr,rs} both remain and are in use.
