Fix src/test/ui/env-vars.rs on 128-core machines on Windows
On Windows, the environment variable NUMBER_OF_PROCESSORS has special
meaning. Unfortunately, you can get different answers, depending on
whether you are enumerating all environment variables or querying a
specific variable. This was causing the src/test/ui/env-vars.rs test
to fail on machines with more than 64 processors when run on Windows.
check the recursion limit when finding a struct's tail
fixes#79437
This does a `delay_span_bug` (via `ty_error_with_message`) rather than emit a new error message, under the assumption that there will be an error elsewhere (even if the type isn't infinitely recursive, just deeper than the recursion limit, this appears to be the case).
Fixes#79661
In incremental compilation mode, we update a `DefPathHash -> DefId`
mapping every time we create a `DepNode` for a foreign `DefId`.
This mapping is written out to the on-disk incremental cache, and is
read by the next compilation session to allow us to lazily decode
`DefId`s.
When we decode a `DepNode` from the current incremental cache, we need
to ensure that any previously-recorded `DefPathHash -> DefId` mapping
gets recorded in the new mapping that we write out. However, PR #74967
didn't do this in all cases, leading to us being unable to decode a
`DefPathHash` in certain circumstances.
This PR refactors some of the code around `DepNode` deserialization to
prevent this kind of mistake from happening again.
Provide IntoInnerError::into_parts
Hi. This is an updated version of the IntoInnerError bits of my previous portmanteau MR #78689. Thanks to `@jyn514` and `@m-ou-se` for helpful comments there.
I have made this insta-stable since it seems like it will probably be uncontroversial, but that is definitely something that someone from the libs API team should be aware of and explicitly consider.
I included a tangentially-related commit providing documentation of the buffer full behaviiour of `&mut [u8] as Write`; the behaviour I am documenting is relied on by the doctest for `into_parts`.
Rename `AllocRef` to `Allocator` and `(de)alloc` to `(de)allocate`
Calling `Box::alloc_ref` and `Vec::alloc_ref` sounds like allocating a reference. To solve this ambiguity, this renames `AllocRef` to `Allocator` and `alloc` to `allocate`. For a more detailed explaination see https://github.com/rust-lang/wg-allocators/issues/76.
closes https://github.com/rust-lang/wg-allocators/issues/76
r? `@KodrAus`
`@rustbot` modify labels: +A-allocators +T-libs
`@rustbot` ping wg-allocators
In particular, IntoIneerError only currently provides .error() which
returns a reference, not an owned value. This is not helpful and
means that a caller of BufWriter::into_inner cannot acquire an owned
io::Error which seems quite wrong.
Signed-off-by: Ian Jackson <ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk>
Fix perf regression caused by #79284https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/79284 only moved code around but this changed inlining and caused a large perf regression. This fixes it for me, though I'm less confident than usual because the regression was not observable with my usual (i.e. incremental) compilation settings.
r? `@Mark-Simulacrum`
Coverage tests for remaining TerminatorKinds and async, improve Assert
Tested and validate results for panic unwind, panic abort, assert!()
macro, TerminatorKind::Assert (for example, numeric overflow), and
async/await.
Implemented a previous documented idea to change Assert handling to be
the same as FalseUnwind and Goto, so it doesn't get its own
BasicCoverageBlock anymore. This changed a couple of coverage regions,
but I validated those changes are not any worse than the prior results,
and probably help assure some consistency (even if some people might
disagree with how the code region is consistently computed).
Fixed issue with async/await. AggregateKind::Generator needs to be
handled like AggregateKind::Closure; coverage span for the outer async
function should not "cover" the async body, which is actually executed
in a separate "closure" MIR.
Fix some clippy lints
Happy to revert these if you think they're less readable, but personally I like them better now (especially the `else { if { ... } }` to `else if { ... }` change).
