9181: Don't complete values in type position r=jonas-schievink a=Veykril
Will add some proper tests in a bit
9182: fix: don't complete derive macros as fn-like macros r=jonas-schievink a=jonas-schievink
Part of https://github.com/rust-analyzer/rust-analyzer/issues/8518
bors r+
Co-authored-by: Lukas Wirth <lukastw97@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Jonas Schievink <jonasschievink@gmail.com>
9169: internal: steps towards attribute macro token mapping r=jonas-schievink a=jonas-schievink
This doesn't work yet, but we seem to be getting a bit further along (for example, we now stop highlighting `use` items inside item with attribute macros as if they were written verbatim).
bors r+
Co-authored-by: Jonas Schievink <jonasschievink@gmail.com>
e.g. if you have a trait T and `impl T for S` for some struct, if you
goto definition on some function name inside the impl, it will go to the
definition of that function inside the `trait T` block, rather than the
current behaviour of not going anywhere at all.
8866: Update salsa r=matklad a=jonas-schievink
This updates salsa to include https://github.com/salsa-rs/salsa/pull/265, and removes all cancellation-related code from rust-analyzer
Co-authored-by: Jonas Schievink <jonasschievink@gmail.com>
8997: internal: stop expanding UseTrees during ItemTree lowering r=jonas-schievink a=jonas-schievink
Closes https://github.com/rust-analyzer/rust-analyzer/issues/8908
Messy diff, but `ItemTree` lowering got simpler, since we now have a strict 1-to-1 mapping between `ast::Item` and `ModItem`.
The most messy part is mapping a single `UseTree` back to its `ast::UseTree` counterpart for diagnostics, but I think the ad-hoc source map built during lowering does the job.
Co-authored-by: Jonas Schievink <jonasschievink@gmail.com>
The idea here is to eventually get rid of `dyn Diagnostic` and
`DiagnosticSink` infrastructure altogether, and just have a `enum
hir::Diagnostic` instead.
The problem with `dyn Diagnostic` is that it is defined in the lowest
level of the stack (hir_expand), but is used by the highest level (ide).
As a first step, we free hir_expand and hir_def from `dyn Diagnostic`
and kick the can up to `hir_ty`, as an intermediate state. The plan is
then to move DiagnosticSink similarly to the hir crate, and, as final
third step, remove its usage from the ide.
One currently unsolved problem is testing. You can notice that the test
which checks precise diagnostic ranges, unresolved_import_in_use_tree,
was moved to the ide layer. Logically, only IDE should have the infra to
render a specific range.
At the same time, the range is determined with the data produced in
hir_def and hir crates, so this layering is rather unfortunate. Working
on hir_def shouldn't require compiling `ide` for testing.
8942: Add `library` semantic token modifier to items from other crates r=arzg a=arzg
Closes#5772.
A lot of code here is pretty repetitive; please let me know if you have any ideas how to improve it, or whether it’s fine as-is.
Side-note: How can I add tests for this? I don’t see a way for the test Rust code in `test_highlighting` to reference other crates to observe the new behaviour.
Co-authored-by: Aramis Razzaghipour <aramisnoah@gmail.com>
The problem was the skipping of binders in
`resolve_method_call_as_callable`; this still doesn't use the _correct_
substitution, but at least it doesn't return a type with free variables
in it.
Fixes#8931.
We can't do the easy hack that we did before anymore, where we kept
track of whether any inference variables changed since the last time we
rechecked obligations. Instead, we store the obligations in
canonicalized form; that way we can easily check the inference variables
to see whether they have changed since the goal was canonicalized.
8813: Get some more array lengths! r=lf- a=lf-
This is built on #8799 and thus contains its changes. I'll rebase it onto master when that one gets merged. It adds support for r-a understanding the length of:
* `let a: [u8; 2] = ...`
* `let a = b"aaa"`
* `let a = [0u8; 4]`
I have added support for getting the values of byte strings, which was not previously there. I am least confident in the correctness of this part and it probably needs some more tests, as we currently have only one test that exercised that part (!).
Fixes#2922.
Co-authored-by: Jade <software@lfcode.ca>
