Fix ICE when forgetting to `Box` a parameter to a `Self::func` call
Closes#90213 .
Assuming we can get the `DefId` of the receiver causes an ICE if the receiver is `Self`. We can just avoid doing this though.
Rollup of 5 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #85833 (Scrape code examples from examples/ directory for Rustdoc)
- #88041 (Make all proc-macro back-compat lints deny-by-default)
- #89829 (Consider types appearing in const expressions to be invariant)
- #90168 (Reset qualifs when a storage of a local ends)
- #90198 (Add caveat about changing parallelism and function call overhead)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Consider types appearing in const expressions to be invariant
This is an approach to fix#80977.
Currently, a type parameter which is only used in a constant expression is considered bivariant and will trigger error E0392 *"parameter T is never used"*.
Here is a short example:
```rust
pub trait Foo {
const N: usize;
}
struct Bar<T: Foo>([u8; T::N])
where [(); T::N]:;
```
([playgound](https://play.rust-lang.org/?version=nightly&mode=debug&edition=2015&gist=b51a272853f75925e72efc1597478aa5))
While it is possible to silence this error by adding a `PhantomData<T>` field, I think the better solution would be to make `T` invariant.
This would be analogous to the invariance constraints added for associated types.
However, I'm quite new to the compiler and unsure whether this is the right approach.
r? ``@varkor`` (since you authored #60058)
Implement coherence checks for negative trait impls
The main purpose of this PR is to be able to [move Error trait to core](https://github.com/rust-lang/project-error-handling/issues/3).
This feature is necessary to handle the following from impl on box.
```rust
impl From<&str> for Box<dyn Error> { ... }
```
Without having negative traits affect coherence moving the error trait into `core` and moving that `From` impl to `alloc` will cause the from impl to no longer compiler because of a potential future incompatibility. The compiler indicates that `&str` _could_ introduce an `Error` impl in the future, and thus prevents the `From` impl in `alloc` that would cause overlap with `From<E: Error> for Box<dyn Error>`. Adding `impl !Error for &str {}` with the negative trait coherence feature will disable this error by encoding a stability guarantee that `&str` will never implement `Error`, making the `From` impl compile.
We would have this in `alloc`:
```rust
impl From<&str> for Box<dyn Error> {} // A
impl<E> From<E> for Box<dyn Error> where E: Error {} // B
```
and this in `core`:
```rust
trait Error {}
impl !Error for &str {}
```
r? `@nikomatsakis`
This PR was built on top of `@yaahc` PR #85764.
Language team proposal: to https://github.com/rust-lang/lang-team/issues/96
Adopt let_else across the compiler
This performs a substitution of code following the pattern:
```
let <id> = if let <pat> = ... { identity } else { ... : ! };
```
To simplify it to:
```
let <pat> = ... { identity } else { ... : ! };
```
By adopting the `let_else` feature (cc #87335).
The PR also updates the syn crate because the currently used version of the crate doesn't support `let_else` syntax yet.
Note: Generally I'm the person who *removes* usages of unstable features from the compiler, not adds more usages of them, but in this instance I think it hopefully helps the feature get stabilized sooner and in a better state. I have written a [comment](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/87335#issuecomment-944846205) on the tracking issue about my experience and what I feel could be improved before stabilization of `let_else`.
Remove redundant member-constraint check
impl trait will, for each lifetime in the hidden type, register a "member constraint" that says the lifetime must be equal or outlive one of the lifetimes of the impl trait. These member constraints will be solved by borrowck
But, as you can see in the big red block of removed code, there was an ad-hoc check for member constraints happening at the site where they get registered. This check had some minor effects on diagnostics, but will fall down on its feet with my big type alias impl trait refactor. So we removed it and I pulled the removal out into a (hopefully) reviewable PR that works on master directly.
Some "parenthesis" and "parentheses" fixes
"Parenthesis" is the singular (e.g. one `(` or one `)`) and "parentheses" is the plural (multiple `(` or `)`s) and this is not hard to mix up so here are some fixes for that.
Inspired by #89958
Remove trailing semicolon from macro call span
Macro call site spans are now less surprising/more consistent since they no longer contain a semicolon after the macro call.
The downside is that we need to do a little guesswork to get the semicolon in diagnostics. But this should not be noticeable since it is rare for the semicolon to not immediately follow the macro call.
The syn crate has gained support for let_else syntax in version 1.0.76,
see https://github.com/dtolnay/syn/pull/1057 .
In the three instances that use let_else, we've sent code through an
attr macro, which would create compile errors when there was no
let_else support in syn. To avoid this, we ran
`cargo +nightly update -p syn` for updating the syn crate.
This performs a substitution of code following the pattern:
let <id> = if let <pat> = ... { identity } else { ... : ! };
To simplify it to:
let <pat> = ... { identity } else { ... : ! };
By adopting the let_else feature.
Rollup of 7 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #86011 (move implicit `Sized` predicate to end of list)
- #89821 (Add a strange test for `unsafe_code` lint.)
- #89859 (add dedicated error variant for writing the discriminant of an uninhabited enum variant)
- #89870 (Suggest Box::pin when Pin::new is used instead)
- #89880 (Use non-checking TLS relocation in aarch64 asm! sym test.)
- #89885 (add long explanation for E0183)
- #89894 (Remove unused dependencies from rustc_const_eval)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Suggest Box::pin when Pin::new is used instead
This fixes an incorrect diagnostic.
**Based on #89390**; only the last commit is specific to this PR. "Ignore whitespace changes" also helps here.
move implicit `Sized` predicate to end of list
In `Bounds::predicates()`, move the implicit `Sized` predicate to the
end of the generated list. This means that if there is an explicit
`Sized` bound, it will be checked first, and any resulting
diagnostics will have a more useful span.
Fixes#85998, at least partially. ~~Based on #85979, but only the last 2 commits are new for this pull request.~~ (edit: rebased) A full fix would need to deal with where-clauses, and that seems difficult. Basically, predicates are being collected in multiple stages, and there are two places where implicit `Sized` predicates can be inserted: once for generic parameters, and once for where-clauses. I think this insertion is happening too early, and we should actually do it only at points where we collect all of the relevant trait bounds for a type parameter.
I could use some help interpreting the changes to the stderr output. It looks like reordering the predicates changed some diagnostics that don't obviously have anything to do with `Sized` bounds. Possibly some error reporting code is making assumptions about ordering of predicates? The diagnostics for src/test/ui/derives/derives-span-Hash-*.rs seem to have improved, no longer pointing at the type parameter identifier, but src/test/ui/type-alias-impl-trait/generic_duplicate_param_use9.rs became less verbose for some reason.
I also ran into an instance of #84970 while working on this, but I kind of expected that could happen, because I'm reordering predicates. I can open a separate issue on that if it would be helpful.
``@estebank`` this seems likely to conflict (slightly?) with your work on #85947; how would you like to resolve that?
Fix incorrect Box::pin suggestion
The suggestion checked if `Pin<Box<T>>` could be coeerced to the expected
type, but did not check predicates created by the coercion. We now
look for predicates that definitely cannot be satisfied before giving
the suggestion.
The suggestion is still marked MaybeIncorrect because we allow predicates that
are still ambiguous and can't be proven.
Fixes#72117.
Add `const_eval_select` intrinsic
Adds an intrinsic that calls a given function when evaluated at compiler time, but generates a call to another function when called at runtime.
See https://github.com/rust-lang/const-eval/issues/7 for previous discussion.
r? `@oli-obk.`
The suggestion checked if Pin<Box<T>> could be coeerced to the expected
type, but did not check predicates created by the coercion. We now
look for predicates that definitely cannot be satisfied before giving
the suggestion.
The suggestion is marked MaybeIncorrect because we allow predicates that
are still ambiguous and can't be proven.
Fix inherent impl overlap check.
The current implementation of the overlap check was slightly buggy, and unified the wrong connected component in the `ids.len() <= 1` case. This became visible in another PR which changed the iteration order of items.
r? ``@matthewjasper`` since you reviewed the other PR.
Ignore type of projections for upvar capturing
Fix#89606
Ignore type of projections for upvar capturing. Originally HashMap is used, and the hash/eq implementation of Place takes the type of projections into account. These types may differ by lifetime which causes #89606 to ICE.
I originally considered erasing regions but `place.ty()` is used when creating upvar tuple type, more than just serving as a key type, so I switched to a linear comparison with custom eq (`compare_place_ignore_ty`) instead.
r? `@wesleywiser`
`@rustbot` label +T-compiler
Don't normalize xform_ret_ty during method candidate assembly
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/85671
Normalizing the return type of a method candidate together with the expected receiver type of the method can lead to valid method candidates being rejected during probing. Specifically in the example of the fixed issue we have a `self_ty` of the form `&A<&[Coef]>` whereas the `impl_ty` of the method would be `&A<_>`, if we normalize the projection in the return type we unify the inference variable with `Cont`, which will lead us to reject the candidate in the sup type check in `consider_probe`. Since we don't actually need the normalized return type during candidate assembly, we postpone the normalization until we consider candidates in `consider_probe`.
