4133: main: eagerly prime goto-definition caches r=matklad a=BurntSushi
This commit eagerly primes the caches used by goto-definition by
submitting a "phantom" goto-definition request. This is perhaps a bit
circuitous, but it does actually get the job done. The result of this
change is that once RA is finished its initial loading of a project,
goto-definition requests are instant. There don't appear to be any more
surprise latency spikes.
This _partially_ addresses #1650 in that it front-loads the latency of the
first goto-definition request, which in turn makes it more predictable and
less surprising. In particular, this addresses the use case where one opens
the text editor, starts reading code for a while, and only later issues the
first goto-definition request. Before this PR, that first goto-definition request
is guaranteed to have high latency in any reasonably sized project. But
after this PR, there's a good chance that it will now be instant.
What this _doesn't_ address is that initial loading time. In fact, it makes it
longer by adding a phantom goto-definition request to the initial startup
sequence. However, I observed that while this did make initial loading
slower, it was overall a somewhat small (but not insignificant) fraction
of initial loading time.
-----
At least, the above is what I _want_ to do. The actual change in this PR is just a proof-of-concept. I came up with after an evening of printf-debugging. Once I found the spot where this cache priming should go, I was unsure of how to generate a phantom input. So I just took an input I knew worked from my printf-debugging and hacked it in. Obviously, what I'd like to do is make this more general such that it will always work.
I don't know whether this is the "right" approach or not. My guess is that there is perhaps a cleaner solution that more directly primes whatever cache is being lazily populated rather than fudging the issue with a phantom goto-definition request.
I created this as a draft PR because I'd really like help making this general. I think whether y'all want to accept this patch is perhaps a separate question. IMO, it seems like a good idea, but to be honest, I'm happy to maintain this patch on my own since it's so trivial. But I would like to generalize it so that it will work in any project.
My thinking is that all I really need to do is find a file and a token somewhere in the loaded project, and then use that as input. But I don't quite know how to connect all the data structures to do that. Any help would be appreciated!
cc @matklad since I've been a worm in your ear about this problem. :-)
Co-authored-by: Andrew Gallant <jamslam@gmail.com>
This commit makes RA more aggressive about eagerly priming the caches.
In particular, this fixes an issue where even after RA was done priming
its caches, an initial goto-definition request would have very high
latency. This fixes that issue by requesting syntax highlighting for
everything. It is presumed that this is a tad wasteful, but not overly
so.
This commit also tweaks the logic that determines when the cache is
primed. Namely, instead of just priming it when the state is loaded
initially, we attempt to prime it whenever some state changes. This
fixes an issue where if a modification notification is seen before cache
priming is done, it would stop the cache priming early.
4128: Include correct item path for variant completions r=matklad a=jonas-schievink
The test would previously suggest `E::V`, which is not enough to name the variant as the enum is in a module. Now it correctly suggests the full path `m::E::V`.
Co-authored-by: Jonas Schievink <jonasschievink@gmail.com>
3998: Make add_function generate functions in other modules via qualified path r=matklad a=TimoFreiberg
Additional feature for #3639
- [x] Add tests for paths with more segments
- [x] Make generating the function in another file work
- [x] Add `pub` or `pub(crate)` to the generated function if it's generated in a different module
- [x] Make the assist jump to the edited file
- [x] Enable file support in the `check_assist` helper
4006: Syntax highlighting for format strings r=matklad a=ltentrup
I have an implementation for syntax highlighting for format string modifiers `{}`.
The first commit refactors the changes in #3826 into a separate struct.
The second commit implements the highlighting: first we check in a macro call whether the macro is a format macro from `std`. In this case, we remember the format string node. If we encounter this node during syntax highlighting, we check for the format modifiers `{}` using regular expressions.
There are a few places which I am not quite sure:
- Is the way I extract the macro names correct?
- Is the `HighlightTag::Attribute` suitable for highlighting the `{}`?
Let me know what you think, any feedback is welcome!
Co-authored-by: Timo Freiberg <timo.freiberg@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Leander Tentrup <leander.tentrup@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Leander Tentrup <ltentrup@users.noreply.github.com>
3954: Improve autocompletion by looking on the type and name r=matklad a=bnjjj
This tweet (https://twitter.com/tjholowaychuk/status/1248918374731714560) gaves me the idea to implement that in rust-analyzer.
Basically for this first example I made some examples when we are in a function call definition. I look on the parameter list to prioritize autocompletions for the same types and if it's the same type + the same name then it's displayed first in the completion list.
So here is a draft, first step to open a discussion and know what you think about the implementation. It works (cf tests) but maybe I can make a better implementation at some places. Be careful the code needs some refactoring to be better and concise.
PS: It was lot of fun writing this haha
Co-authored-by: Benjamin Coenen <5719034+bnjjj@users.noreply.github.com>
4065: Complete unqualified enum names in patterns and expressions r=matklad a=nathanwhit
This PR implements the completion described in #4014.
The result looks like so for patterns:
<img width="542" alt="Screen Shot 2020-04-20 at 3 53 55 PM" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/17734409/79794010-8f529400-831f-11ea-9673-f838aa9bc962.png">
and for `expr`s:
<img width="620" alt="Screen Shot 2020-04-21 at 3 51 24 PM" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/17734409/79908784-d73ded80-83e9-11ea-991d-921f0cb27e6f.png">
I'm not confident that the completion text itself is very robust, as it will unconditionally add completions for enum variants with the form `Enum::Variant`. This means (I believe) it would still suggest `Enum::Variant` even if the local name is changed i.e. `use Enum as Foo` or the variants are brought into scope such as through `use Enum::*`.
Co-authored-by: nathanwhit <nathan.whitaker01@gmail.com>
Detailed changes:
1) Implement a lexer for string literals that divides the string in format specifier `{}` including the format specifier modifier.
2) Adapt syntax highlighting to add ranges for the detected sequences.
3) Add a test case for the format string syntax highlighting.
This is a quick way to implement unresolved reference diagnostics.
For example, adding to VS Code config
"editor.tokenColorCustomizationsExperimental": {
"unresolvedReference": "#FF0000"
},
will highlight all unresolved refs in red.
4029: Fix various proc-macro bugs r=matklad a=edwin0cheng
This PRs does the following things:
1. Fixed#4001 by splitting `LIFETIME` lexer token to two mbe tokens. It is because rustc token stream expects `LIFETIME` as a combination of punct and ident, but RA `tt:TokenTree` treats it as a single `Ident` previously.
2. Fixed#4003, by skipping `proc-macro` for completion. It is because currently we don't have `AstNode` for `proc-macro`. We would need to redesign how to implement `HasSource` for `proc-macro`.
3. Fixed a bug how empty `TokenStream` merging in `proc-macro-srv` such that no L_DOLLAR and R_DOLLAR will be emitted accidentally.
Co-authored-by: Edwin Cheng <edwin0cheng@gmail.com>
3955: Align grammar for record patterns and literals r=matklad a=matklad
The grammar now looks like this
[name_ref :] pat
bors r+
🤖
Co-authored-by: Aleksey Kladov <aleksey.kladov@gmail.com>
3901: Add more heuristics for hiding obvious param hints r=matklad a=IceSentry
This will now hide `value`, `pat`, `rhs` and `other`. These words were selected from the std because they are used in commonly used functions with only a single param and are obvious by their use.
It will also hide the hint if the passed param **starts** or end with the param_name. Maybe we could also split on '_' and check if one of the string is the param_name.
I think it would be good to also hide `bytes` if the type is `[u8; n]` but I'm not sure how to get the param type signature.
Closes#3900
Co-authored-by: IceSentry <c.giguere42@gmail.com>
This will now hide "value", "pat", "rhs" and "other"
These words were selected from the std because they are used in common functions with only a single param and are obvious by their use.
I think it would be good to also hide "bytes" if the type is `[u8; n]` but I'm not sure how to get the param type signature
It will also hide the hint if the passed param starts or end with the param_name
3826: Flatten nested highlight ranges during DFS traversal r=matklad a=ltentrup
Implements the flattening of nested highlights from #3447.
There is a caveat: I needed to add `Clone` to `HighlightedRange` to split highlight ranges ~and the nesting does not appear in the syntax highlighting test (it does appear in the accidental-quadratic test but there it is not checked against a ground-truth)~.
I have added a test case for the example mentioned in #3447.
Co-authored-by: Leander Tentrup <leander.tentrup@gmail.com>
3829: Adds to SSR match for semantically equivalent call and method call r=matklad a=mikhail-m1
#3186
maybe I've missed some corner cases, but it works in general
Co-authored-by: Mikhail Modin <mikhailm1@gmail.com>
In textmate, keyword.control is used for all kinds of things; in fact,
the default scope mapping for keyword is keyword.control!
So let's add a less ambiguous controlFlow modifier
See Microsoft/vscode#94367
3797: Don't show chaining hints for record literals and unit structs r=matklad a=lnicola
Fixes#3796
r? @Veetaha
Co-authored-by: Laurențiu Nicola <lnicola@dend.ro>
Iterate through TupleStructPat's until a MatchArm if
one exists. Store in a new is_pat_bind_and_path bool
and allow the `complete_scope` to find matches.
Added some tests to ensure it works in simple and nested cases.
3591: Support local macro_rules r=matklad a=edwin0cheng
This PR implement local `macro_rules` in function body, by adding following things:
1. While lowering, add a `MacroDefId` in body's `ItemScope` as a textual legacy macro.
2. Make `Expander::enter_expand` search with given `ItemScope`.
3. Make `Resolver::resolve_path_as_macro` search with `LocalItemScope`.
Fix#2181
Co-authored-by: Edwin Cheng <edwin0cheng@gmail.com>
The `ty` function in code_model returned the type with placeholders for type
parameters. That's nice for printing, but not good for completion, because
placeholders won't unify with anything else: So the type we got for `HashMap`
was `HashMap<K, V, T>`, which doesn't unify with `HashMap<?, ?, RandomState>`,
so the `new` method wasn't shown.
Now we instead return `HashMap<{unknown}, {unknown}, {unknown}>`, which does
unify with the impl type. Maybe we should just expose this properly as variables
though, i.e. we'd return something like `exists<type, type, type> HashMap<?0,
?1, ?2>` (in Chalk notation). It'll make the API more complicated, but harder to
misuse. (And it would handle cases like `type TypeAlias<T> = HashMap<T, T>` more
correctly.)
3553: Completions do not show for function with same name as mod r=matklad a=JoshMcguigan
fixes#3444
I've added a test case in `crates/ra_ide/src/completion/complete_path.rs` which verifies the described behavior in #3444. Digging in, I found that [the module scope iterator](ba62d8bd1c/crates/ra_ide/src/completion/complete_path.rs (L22)) only provides the module `z`, and does not provide the function `z` (although if I name the function something else then it does show up here).
I thought perhaps the name wasn't being properly resolved, but I added a test in `crates/ra_hir_def/src/nameres/tests.rs` which seems to suggest that it is? I've tried to figure out how to bridge the gap between these two tests (one passing, one failing) to see where the function `z` is being dropped, but to this point I haven't been able to track it down.
Any pointers on where I might look for this?
Co-authored-by: Josh Mcguigan <joshmcg88@gmail.com>
3543: Parameter inlay hint separate from variable type inlay? #2876 r=matklad a=slyngbaek
Add setting to allow enabling either type inlay hints or parameter
inlay hints or both. Group the the max inlay hint length option
into the object.
- Add a new type for the inlayHint options.
- Add tests to ensure the inlays don't happen on the server side
Co-authored-by: Steffen Lyngbaek <steffenlyngbaek@gmail.com>
- Instead of a single object type, use several individual nested types
to allow toggling from the settings GUI
- Remove unused struct definitions
- Install and test that the toggles work
3549: Implement env! macro r=matklad a=edwin0cheng
This PR implements `env!` macro by adding following things:
1. Added `additional_outdirs` settings in vscode. (naming to be bikeshed)
2. Added `ExternSourceId` which is a wrapping for SourceRootId but only used in extern sources. It is because `OUT_DIR` is not belonged to any crate and we have to access it behind an `AstDatabase`.
3. This PR does not implement the `OUT_DIR` parsing from `cargo check`. I don't have general design about this, @kiljacken could we reuse some cargo watch code for that ?
~~Block on [#3536]~~
PS: After this PR , we (kind of) completed the `include!(concat!(env!('OUT_DIR'), "foo.rs")` macro call combo. [Exodia Obliterate!](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfqNH3FoGi0)
Co-authored-by: Edwin Cheng <edwin0cheng@gmail.com>
3542: Renames work on struct field shorthands r=matklad a=m-n
When renaming either a local or a struct field, struct field shorthands are now renamed correctly.
Happy to refactor this if it doesn't fit the design of the code. Thanks for adding the suggestion of where to start on the issue.
I wasn't sure if I should also look at the behavior of renaming when placing the cursor at the field shorthand; the following describes the behavior with this patch:
```rust
#[test]
fn test_rename_field_shorthand_for_unspecified() {
// when renaming a shorthand, should we have a way to specify
// between renaming the field and the local?
//
// If not is this the correct default?
test_rename(
r#"
struct Foo {
i: i32,
}
impl Foo {
fn new(i: i32) -> Self {
Self { i<|> }
}
}
"#,
"j",
r#"
struct Foo {
i: i32,
}
impl Foo {
fn new(j: i32) -> Self {
Self { i: j }
}
}
"#,
);
}
```
Resolves#3431
Co-authored-by: Matt Niemeir <matt.niemeir@gmail.com>
- Updated naming of config
- Define struct in ra_ide and use remote derive in rust-analyzer/config
- Make inlayConfig type more flexible to support more future types
- Remove constructor only used in tests
Add setting to allow enabling either type inlay hints or parameter
inlay hints or both. Group the the max inlay hint length option
into the object.
- Add a new type for the inlayHint options.
- Add tests to ensure the inlays don't happen on the server side
To test whether the receiver type matches for the impl, we unify the given self
type (in this case `HashSet<{unknown}>`) with the self type of the
impl (`HashSet<?0>`), but if the given self type contains Unknowns, they won't
be unified with the variables in those places. So we got a receiver type that
was different from the expected one, and concluded the impl doesn't match.
The fix is slightly hacky; if after the unification, our variables are still
there, we make them fall back to Unknown. This does make some sense though,
since we don't want to 'leak' the variables.
Fixes#3547.
3513: Completion in macros r=matklad a=flodiebold
I experimented a bit with completion in macros. It's kind of working, but there are a lot of rough edges.
- I'm trying to expand the macro call with the inserted fake token. This requires some hacky additions on the HIR level to be able to do "hypothetical" expansions. There should probably be a nicer API for this, if we want to do it this way. I'm not sure whether it's worth it, because we still can't do a lot if the original macro call didn't expand in nearly the same way. E.g. if we have something like `println!("", x<|>)` the expansions will look the same and everything is fine; but in that case we could maybe have achieved the same result in a simpler way. If we have something like `m!(<|>)` where `m!()` doesn't even expand or expands to something very different, we don't really know what to do anyway.
- Relatedly, there are a lot of cases where this doesn't work because either the original call or the hypothetical call doesn't expand. E.g. if we have `m!(x.<|>)` the original token tree doesn't parse as an expression; if we have `m!(match x { <|> })` the hypothetical token tree doesn't parse. It would be nice if we could have better error recovery in these cases.
Co-authored-by: Florian Diebold <flodiebold@gmail.com>
3516: Handle visibility in more cases in completion r=matklad a=flodiebold
This means we don't show private items when completing paths or method calls.
We might want to show private items if we can edit their definition and provide a "make public" assist, but I feel like we'd need better sorting of completion items for that, so they can be not shown or sorted to the bottom by default. Until then, they're usually more of a distraction to me.
Co-authored-by: Florian Diebold <flodiebold@gmail.com>
Allow trait autocompletions for unimplemented associated fn's, types,
and consts without using explicit keywords before hand (fn, type,
const).
The sequel to #3108.
Note that `detail` was replced with `function_signature` to avoid
calling `from` on FunctionSignature twice.
I didn't add new tests because the current ones seem enough.
