This adds a new rustc target-configuration called 'i686-unknown_uefi'.
This is similar to existing x86_64-unknown_uefi target.
The i686-unknown-uefi target can be used to build Intel Architecture
32bit UEFI application. The ABI defined in UEFI environment (aka IA32)
is similar to cdecl.
We choose i686-unknown-uefi-gnu instead of i686-unknown-uefi to avoid
the intrinsics generated by LLVM. The detail of root-cause and solution
analysis is added as comment in the code.
For x86_64-unknown-uefi, we cannot use -gnu, because the ABI between
MSVC and GNU is totally different, and UEFI chooses ABI similar to MSVC.
For i686-unknown-uefi, the UEFI chooses cdecl ABI, which is same as
MSVC and GNU. According to LLVM code, the only differences between MSVC
and GNU are fmodf(f32), longjmp() and TLS, which have no impact to UEFI.
As such, using i686-unknown-uefi-gnu is the simplest way to pass the build.
Adding the undefined symbols, such as _aulldiv() to rust compiler-builtins
is out of scope. But it may be considered later.
The scope of this patch is limited to support target-configuration.
No standard library support is added in this patch. Such work can be
done in future enhancement.
Cc: Josh Triplett <josh.triplett@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Josh Triplett <josh.triplett@intel.com>
On architectures such as powerpc64 that use extend_integer_width_to in
their C ABI processing, integer parameters shorter than the native
register width will be annotated with the ArgAttribute::SExt or
ArgAttribute::ZExt attribute, and that attribute will be included in the
generated LLVM IR.
In this test, all relevant parameters are `i32`, which will get the
`signext` annotation on the relevant 64-bit architectures. Match both
the annotated and non-annotated case, but enforce that the annotation is
applied consistently.
Update version of `rustc-std-workspace-*` crates
This commit updates the version of the `rustc-std-workspace-*` crates
in-tree which are used in `[patch]`. This will guarantee that Cargo will
select these versions even if minor updates are published to crates.io
because otherwise a newer version on crates.io would be preferred which
misses the point of `[patch]`!
This commit updates the version of the `rustc-std-workspace-*` crates
in-tree which are used in `[patch]`. This will guarantee that Cargo will
select these versions even if minor updates are published to crates.io
because otherwise a newer version on crates.io would be preferred which
misses the point of `[patch]`!
Unify escape usage
Fixes#63443.
I chose to keep the search text when pressing escape so when we focus on the search bar, we got the results again without needing to load them again. I also unified a bit a few things (maybe I should have done it in another commit, sorry...).
r? @Mark-Simulacrum
Override `StepBy::{try_fold, try_rfold}`
Previous PR: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/51435
The previous PR was closed in favor of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/51601, which was later reverted. I don't think these implementations will make it harder to specialize `StepBy<Range<_>>` later, so we should be able to land this without any consequences.
This should fix https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/57517 – in my benchmarks `iter` and `iter.step_by(1)` now perform equally well, provided internal iteration is used.
Resolve attributes in several places
Resolve attributes for Arm, Field, FieldPat, GenericParam, Param, StructField and Variant.
This PR is based on @petrochenkov work located at 83fdb8d598.
This commit adds a `backtrace` module to the standard library, as
designed in [RFC 2504]. The `Backtrace` type is intentionally very
conservative, effectively only allowing capturing it and printing it.
Additionally this commit also adds a `backtrace` method to the `Error`
trait which defaults to returning `None`, as specified in [RFC 2504].
More information about the design here can be found in [RFC 2504] and in
the [tracking issue].
Implementation-wise this is all based on the `backtrace` crate and very
closely mirrors the `backtrace::Backtrace` type on crates.io. Otherwise
it's pretty standard in how it handles everything internally.
[RFC 2504]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/blob/master/text/2504-fix-error.md
[tracking issue]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/53487
cc #53487
Stabilize `bind_by_move_pattern_guards` in Rust 1.39.0
Closes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/15287.
After stabilizing `#![feature(bind_by_move_pattern_guards)]`, you can now use bind-by-move bindings in patterns and take references to those bindings in `if` guards of `match` expressions. For example, the following now becomes legal:
```rust
fn main() {
let array: Box<[u8; 4]> = Box::new([1, 2, 3, 4]);
match array {
nums
// ---- `nums` is bound by move.
if nums.iter().sum::<u8>() == 10
// ^------ `.iter()` implicitly takes a reference to `nums`.
=> {
drop(nums);
// --------- Legal as `nums` was bound by move and so we have ownership.
}
_ => unreachable!(),
}
}
```
r? @matthewjasper
