A few updates:
- Some minor wording and formatting changes.
- Remove the `cargo` column.
- Explain the columns up-front.
- Add no-wrap on the target-triple, which looks better to me.
- Minor mention on how to install support for a built-in target via rustup.
Reland #74069
Investigation in #74716 has concluded that this PR is indeed not a regression (and in fact the rollup itself is not either).
This reverts the revert in #74611.
r? @nnethercote cc @eddyb
Rollup of 7 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #75036 (Prefer pattern matching over indexing)
- #75378 (Introduce `rustc_lexer::is_ident` and use it in couple of places)
- #75393 (Fully handle "?" shortcut)
- #75403 (Update comment for function)
- #75407 (Requested changes to [*mut T|*const T]::set_ptr_value)
- #75408 (Update MinGW comments in ci.yml)
- #75409 (Fix range term in alloc vec doc)
Failed merges:
r? @ghost
Requested changes to [*mut T|*const T]::set_ptr_value
This is a follow-up to PR #74774 (tracking issue #75091), acting on some change requests made after approval:
- adds `#[must_use]` attribute
- changes type of `val` pointer argument from `()` to `u8`
- adjusts documentation mentioning pointer provenance
This reverts commit 25670749b4.
This commit does not actually fix the problem. It merely removes the name of
the argument from the LLVM output. Even without the name, Rust codegen still
spills the (nameless) variable onto the stack which is the root cause. The root
cause is solved in the next commit.
move Deaggregate pass to post_borrowck_cleanup
Reopen of #71946
Only the second commit is from this PR, the other commit is a bugfix that's in the process of getting merged. I'll rebase once that's done
In #70073 MIR pass handling got reorganized, but with the goal of not changing behavior (except for disabling some optimizations on opt-level = 0). But there we realized that the Deaggregator pass, while conceptually more of a "cleanup" pass (and one that should be run before optimizations), was run in the middle of the optimization chain. Likely this is an accident of history, so I suggest we try and clean that up by making it a proper cleanup pass.
This does change mir-opt output, because deaggregation now runs before const-prop instead of after.
r? @wesleywiser @rust-lang/wg-mir-opt
cc @RalfJung
Add sample fix for E0749
Even though the description is clear but the solution may not be as straightforward.
Adding a suggested fix from documentation side.
r? @GuillaumeGomez
However, this suggestion should be shown in rustc itself for easy fix, the documentation should also reflect on the changes in rustc. Currently,
```
error[E0749]: negative impls cannot have any items
--> test.rs:6:5
|
6 | type Foo = i32; // error!
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
error: aborting due to previous error
For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E0749`.
```
rustc should tell the user to remove it.
Tweak conditions for E0026 and E0769
When we have a tuple struct used with struct we don't want to suggest using the (valid) struct syntax with numeric field names. Instead we want to suggest the expected syntax.
Given
```rust
fn main() {
match MyOption::MySome(42) {
MyOption::MySome { x: 42 } => (),
_ => (),
}
}
```
We now emit E0769 "tuple variant `MyOption::MySome` written as struct variant" instead of E0026 "variant `MyOption::MySome` does not have a field named `x`".
