#[inline] slice::Iter::advance_by
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/87387#issuecomment-891942661 was marked as a regression. One of the methods in the PR was missing an inline annotation unlike all the other methods on slice iterators.
Let's see if that makes a difference.
Make wrapping_neg() use wrapping_sub(), #[inline(always)]
This is a follow-up change to the fix for #75598. It simplifies the implementation of wrapping_neg() for all integer types by just calling 0.wrapping_sub(self) and always inlines it. This leads to much less assembly code being emitted for opt-level≤1 and thus much better performance for debug-compiled code.
Background is [this discussion on the internals forum](https://internals.rust-lang.org/t/why-does-rust-generate-10x-as-much-unoptimized-assembly-as-gcc/14930).
Remove unnecessary trailing whitespace from error messages
Some error messages currently contain unnecessary trailing whitespace. There are some legitimate reasons for having trailing whitespace in the output, such as for uniform indentation of possibly-empty input lines, but the whitespace I have addressed here occurs in a line used only for spacing, and I see no reason why that should have trailing whitespace (spacing lines inserted in other places also don't have trailing whitespace).
I have also removed a superfluous call to `buffer.putc()`, which has no effect because the same character is already placed there by `draw_col_separator()`.
Use `git diff --ignore-space-at-eol` to see my changes; otherwise the diff is quite large due to the whitespace removed from expected outputs in `src/test/ui/`.
This was removed by #85284 in favor of -Zprofiler-runtime=<name>.
However the suggested -Zprofiler-runtime=None doesn't work because
"None" is treated as a crate name.
Allow labeled loops as value expressions for `break`
Fixes#86948. This is currently allowed:
```rust
return 'label: loop { break 'label 42; };
break ('label: loop { break 'label 42; });
break 1 + 'label: loop { break 'label 42; };
break 'outer 'inner: loop { break 'inner 42; };
```
But not this:
```rust
break 'label: loop { break 'label 42; };
```
I have fixed this, so that the above now parses as an unlabeled break with a labeled loop as its value expression.
rustc: Replace `HirId`s with `LocalDefId`s in `AccessLevels` tables
and passes using those tables - primarily privacy checking, stability checking and dead code checking.
All these passes work with definitions rather than with arbitrary HIR nodes.
r? `@cjgillot`
cc `@lambinoo` (#87487)
Test dropping union fields more
Now that #87403 is merged, a few more tests can be added for reads/writes to dropping union fields.
r? ``@LeSeulArtichaut``
Remove the aarch64 `crypto` target_feature
The subfeatures `aes` or `sha2` should be used instead.
This can't yet be done for ARM targets as some LLVM intrinsics still require `crypto`.
Also update the runtime feature detection tests in `library/std` to mirror the updates in `stdarch`. This also helps https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/86941
r? ``@Amanieu``
Rustdoc accessibility: use an icon for the [-]/[+] controls
This is a reopening of #87207 with improvement for the way of generating the `background-image` CSS property.
I quote from the original PR:
> This way, we can show the plus and minus buttons on screens, while voice
> control will read off actual words "Collapse" and "Expand" instead of reading
> "open brace minus close brace" and "open brace plus close brace".
Part of #87059
r? ``@notriddle``
Remove space after negative sign in Literal to_string
Negative proc macro literal tokens used to be printed with a space between the minus sign and the magnitude. That's because `impl ToString for Literal` used to convert the Literal into a TokenStream, which splits the minus sign into a separate Punct token.
```rust
Literal::isize_unsuffixed(-10).to_string() // "- 10"
```
This PR updates the ToString impl to directly use `rustc_ast::token::Lit`'s ToString, which matches the way Rust negative numbers are idiomatically written without a space.
```rust
Literal::isize_unsuffixed(-10).to_string() // "-10"
```
Add `core::stream::from_iter`
_Tracking issue: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/81798_
This_ PR implements `std::stream::from_iter`, as outlined in the _"Converting an Iterator to a Stream"_ section of the [Stream RFC](https://github.com/nellshamrell/rfcs/blob/add-async-stream-rfc/text/0000-async-stream.md#converting-an-iterator-to-a-stream). This function enables converting an `Iterator` to a `Stream` by wrapping each item in the iterator with a `Poll::Ready` instance.
r? `@tmandry`
cc/ `@rust-lang/libs` `@rust-lang/wg-async-foundations`
## Example
Being able to convert from an iterator into a stream is useful when refactoring from iterative loops into a more functional adapter-based style. This is fairly common when using more complex `filter` / `map` / `find` chains. In its basic form this conversion looks like this:
**before**
```rust
let mut output = vec![];
for item in my_vec {
let out = do_io(item).await?;
output.push(out);
}
```
**after**
```rust
use std::stream;
let output = stream::from_iter(my_vec.iter())
.map(async |item| do_io(item).await)
.collect()?;
```
Having a way to convert an `Iterator` to a `Stream` is essential in enabling this flow.
## Implementation Notes
This PR makes use of `unsafe {}` to pin an item. Currently we're having conversations on the libs stream in Zulip how to bring `pin-project` in as a dependency to `core` so we can omit the `unsafe {}`.
This PR also includes a documentation block which references `Stream::next` which currently doesn't exist in the stdlib (originally included in the RFC and PR, but later omitted because of an unresolved issue). `stream::from_iter` can't stabilize before `Stream` does, and there's still a chance we may stabilize `Stream` with a `next` method. So this PR includes documentation referencing that method, which we can remove as part of stabilization if by any chance we don't have `Stream::next`.
## Alternatives Considered
### `impl IntoStream for T: IntoIterator`
An obvious question would be whether we could make it so every iterator can automatically be converted into a stream by calling `into_stream` on it. The answer is: "perhaps, but it could cause type issues". Types like `std::collections` may want to opt to create manual implementations for `IntoStream` and `IntoIter`, which wouldn't be possible if it was implemented through a catch-all trait.
Possibly an alternative such as `impl IntoStream for T: Iterator` could work, but it feels somewhat restrictive. In the end, converting an iterator to a stream is likely to be a bit of a niche case. And even then, **adding a standalone function to convert an `Iterator` into a `Stream` would not be mutually exclusive with a blanket implementation**.
### Naming
The exact name can be debated in the period before stabilization. But I've chosen `stream::from_iter` rather than `stream::iter` because we are _creating a stream from an iterator_ rather than _iterating a stream_. We also expect to add a stream counterpart to `iter::from_fn` later on (blocked on async closures), and having `stream::from_fn` and `stream::from_iter` would feel like a consistent pair. It also has prior art in `async_std::stream::from_iter`.
## Future Directions
### Stream conversions for collections
This is a building block towards implementing `stream/stream_mut/into_stream` methods for `std::collections`, `std::vec`, and more. This would allow even quicker refactorings from using loops to using iterator adapters by omitting the import altogether:
**before**
```rust
use std::stream;
let output = stream::from_iter(my_vec.iter())
.map(async |item| do_io(item).await)
.collect()?;
```
**after**
```rust
let output = my_vec
.stream()
.map(async |item| do_io(item).await)
.collect()?;
```
Test that FFI-safety warnings don't get accidentally dropped on naked
functions. The big picture is that if you implement a naked function
with the Rust ABI you'll get a warning. Further, if you implement a
naked function with a standardized ABI, but use non-FFI-safe types you
will still get a warning.
rust-lang/rfcs#2774rust-lang/rfcs#2972
Places are usually shallow and quick to visit. By contrast, computing
`is_freeze` can be much costlier, involving inference and trait
solving. Making sure to call `is_freeze` only when necessary should be
beneficial for performance in most cases.
Remove invalid suggestion involving `Fn` trait bound
This pull request closes#85735. The actual issue is a duplicate of #21974, but #85735 contains a further problem, which is an invalid suggestion if `Fn`/`FnMut`/`FnOnce` trait bounds are involved: The suggestion code checks whether the trait bound ends with `>` to determine whether it has any generic arguments, but the `Fn*` traits have a special syntax for generic arguments that doesn't involve angle brackets. The example given in #85735:
```rust
trait Foo {}
impl<'a, 'b, T> Foo for T
where
T: FnMut(&'a ()),
T: FnMut(&'b ()), {
}
```
currently produces:
```
error[E0283]: type annotations needed
--> src/lib.rs:4:8
|
4 | T: FnMut(&'a ()),
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^ cannot infer type for type parameter `T`
|
= note: cannot satisfy `T: FnMut<(&'a (),)>`
help: consider specifying the type arguments in the function call
|
4 | T: FnMut(&'a ())::<Self, Args>,
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
error: aborting due to previous error
```
which is incorrect, because there is no function call, and applying the suggestion would lead to a parse error. With my changes, I get:
```
error[E0283]: type annotations needed
--> test.rs:4:8
|
4 | T: FnMut(&'a ()),
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^ cannot infer type for type parameter `T`
|
::: [...]/library/core/src/ops/function.rs:147:1
|
147 | pub trait FnMut<Args>: FnOnce<Args> {
| ----------------------------------- required by this bound in `FnMut`
|
= note: cannot satisfy `T: FnMut<(&'a (),)>`
error: aborting due to previous error
```
i.e. I have added a check to prevent the invalid suggestion from being issued for `Fn*` bounds, while the underlying issue #21974 remains for now.
Trait upcasting coercion (part2)
This is the second part of trait upcasting coercion implementation.
Currently this is blocked on #86264 .
The third part might be implemented using unsafety checking
r? `@bjorn3`
Trait upcasting coercion (part2)
This is the second part of trait upcasting coercion implementation.
Currently this is blocked on #86264 .
The third part might be implemented using unsafety checking
r? `@bjorn3`
This commit intends to fill out some of the remaining pieces of the
C-unwind ABI. This has a number of other changes with it though to move
this design space forward a bit. Notably contained within here is:
* On `panic=unwind`, the `extern "C"` ABI is now considered as "may
unwind". This fixes a longstanding soundness issue where if you
`panic!()` in an `extern "C"` function defined in Rust that's actually
UB because the LLVM representation for the function has the `nounwind`
attribute, but then you unwind.
* Whether or not a function unwinds now mainly considers the ABI of the
function instead of first checking the panic strategy. This fixes a
miscompile of `extern "C-unwind"` with `panic=abort` because that ABI
can still unwind.
* The aborting stub for non-unwinding ABIs with `panic=unwind` has been
reimplemented. Previously this was done as a small tweak during MIR
generation, but this has been moved to a separate and dedicated MIR
pass. This new pass will, for appropriate functions and function
calls, insert a `cleanup` landing pad for any function call that may
unwind within a function that is itself not allowed to unwind. Note
that this subtly changes some behavior from before where previously on
an unwind which was caught-to-abort it would run active destructors in
the function, and now it simply immediately aborts the process.
* The `#[unwind]` attribute has been removed and all users in tests and
such are now using `C-unwind` and `#![feature(c_unwind)]`.
I think this is largely the last piece of the RFC to implement.
Unfortunately I believe this is still not stabilizable as-is because
activating the feature gate changes the behavior of the existing `extern
"C"` ABI in a way that has no replacement. My thinking for how to enable
this is that we add support for the `C-unwind` ABI on stable Rust first,
and then after it hits stable we change the behavior of the `C` ABI.
That way anyone straddling stable/beta/nightly can switch to `C-unwind`
safely.
This way, we can show the plus and minus buttons on screens, while voice
control will read off actual words "Collapse" and "Expand" instead of reading
"open brace minus close brace" and "open brace plus close brace".
Part of #87059
