Lintcheck and an options for command line options
Make it possible to add command line options to the clippy invocation of the lintcheck-tool
changelog: none
r? `@matthiaskrgr`
I found that this will be really helpful if we use a separate repository and want to maintain a all-lints-passing list of crates. See my early experimentation here: https://github.com/flip1995/clippy-lintcheck
```
git submodule update --init
cargo run -- --mode=all
```
Will run the lintcheck tool on all the specified crates in `config/` in that repository.
- Take `FnMut` in `rustc_trait_selection::find_auto_trait_generics`
- Take `&mut DocContext` in most of `clean`
- Collect the iterator in auto_trait_impls instead of iterating lazily; the lifetimes were really bad.
- Changes `fn sess` to properly return a borrow with the lifetime of `'tcx`, not the mutable borrow.
Only store a LocalDefId in some HIR nodes
Some HIR nodes are guaranteed to be HIR owners: Item, TraitItem, ImplItem, ForeignItem and MacroDef.
As a consequence, we do not need to store the `HirId`'s `local_id`, and we can directly store a `LocalDefId`.
This allows to avoid a bit of the dance with `tcx.hir().local_def_id` and `tcx.hir().local_def_id_to_hir_id` mappings.
validation: fix invalid-fn-ptr error message
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/82061 changed the code here to print an `ImmTy` instead of a `ScalarMaybeUninit`; that was an accident. So go back to printing a `ScalarMaybeUninit`.
r? ```@oli-obk```
avoid full-slicing slices
If we already have a slice, there is no need to get another full-range slice from that, just use the original.
clippy::redundant_slicing
Fix ES5 errors (IE11)
rustdoc is supposed to run on IE11 but someone reported me that it wasn't. I just confirmed it by using `es-check` with the `es5` option like this:
```
$ es-check es5 src/librustdoc/html/static/*.js
```
The PR fixes those issues and add CI checks to prevent regressions.
`@Mark-Simulacrum:` I added checks in the CI, but not sure if it's the correct way to do it. Any help on that side would be very appreciated!
r? `@Nemo157`
