Document time of back operations of a Linked List
Popping and pushing from the end of a linked list is constant time. This
documentation is already there for popping and pushing from the front.
@bors: r+ 38fe8d2 rollup
Fix BTreeMap UB
BTreeMap currently causes UB by created a shared reference to a too-small allocation. This PR fixes that by introducing a `NodeHeader` type and using that until we really need access to the key/value arrays. Avoiding run-time checks in `into_key_slice` was somewhat tricky, see the comments embedded in the code.
I also adjusted `as_leaf_mut` to return a raw pointer, because creating a mutable reference asserts that there are no aliases to the pointee, but that's not always correct: We use `as_leaf_mut` twice to create two mutable slices for keys and values; the second call overlaps with the first slice and hence is not a unique pointer.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/54957
Cc @nikomatsakis @Gankro
Clearer error message for dead assign
I'm not that this is the right place for this (if it needs an RFC or not).
I had the problem where I misunderstood the compiler lint message https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/56436 and other people seem to have had the same problem https://www.reddit.com/r/rust/comments/8cy9p4/value_assigned_to_is_never_read/.
I think this new wording might be slightly clearer (and help out beginners like me). I'm very new though, so there might be some nuance I'm missing that would make this more confusing or a bad idea for other reasons.
I thought I would create a PR to make it easy to change the code if the consensus was that it would make sense to make a change.
If this is the wrong place for this sort of thing I'll happily delete/move it.
Documentation for impl From for AtomicBool and other Atomic types
As part of issue #51430 (cc @skade).
The impl is very simple, so not sure if we need to go into any details.
Point out that the final component of the path name might be a filename
(and not a directory name). Previously, the doc said that all components
of the path must be directory names, when it actually only ment all but
the final one.
Fixes#54056.
Rollup of 7 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #56677 (#[must_use] on traits in stdlib)
- #56679 (overhaul external doc attribute diagnostics)
- #56682 (Update the stdsimd submodule)
- #56691 (fix install broken link)
- #56710 (Always set the RDRAND and RDSEED features on SGX)
- #56713 (Test capacity of ZST vector)
- #56841 (Add some unit tests to compiletest)
Failed merges:
r? @ghost
This issue has since been fixed in LLVM:
1886c8e29a
Furthermore this doesn't actually work, because the "8" literal does
not match the $BITS provided from the macro invocation, so effectively
this code was not being used anyway...
Changes:
````
rustup rust-lang/rust#52994
Fix test
Line length fix
Remove references to sized for end users
Remove DUMMY_SP
Add suggestion for replacement
Update lint definitions
Lint for Vec<Box<T: Sized>> - Closes#3530
Fix doc_markdown mixed case false positive
question_mark: Suggest Some(opt?) for if-else
redundant_field_names: Do not trigger on path with type params
question_mark: Lint only early returns
question_mark: Fix applicability
Remove obsolete comment
new_without_default, partialeq_ne_impl: Use span_lint_node
Update .stderr after rebase
cargo fmt and remove stabilized feature
Make suggestion Applicability::MachineApplicable
Address review feedback
Extract method
Check array lengths to prevent OOB access
Add suggestion for explicit_write lint
Fix write_with_newline escaping false positive
````
Add some unit tests to compiletest
Based on #56792, otherwise the tests won't be executed on CI.
Just a small start, I would like to add more testing to compiletest in the future but that will require some refactoring first.
cc #47606
Test capacity of ZST vector
Initially, #50233 accidentally changed the capacity of empty ZST. This was pointed out during code review. This commit adds a test to prevent capacity of ZST vectors from accidentally changing to prevent that from happening again.
Always set the RDRAND and RDSEED features on SGX
Not sure if this is 100% correct.
This [Intel article](https://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/intel-software-guard-extensions-tutorial-part-5-enclave-development) goes in great depth regarding using (untrusted) CPUID to see whether RDRAND/RDSEED is supported, and explains what happens to the enclave if the CPUID result is faked.
I'd say that an implementation of SGX that doesn't make RDRAND available to the enclave is so severely limited/broken that it's ok if you get #UD in that case. The case is less clear for RDSEED, but it so far every processor released by Intel with SGX support also has RDSEED (including Gemini Lake).
cc @briansmith
overhaul external doc attribute diagnostics
This PR improves the error handling and spans for the external doc attribute. Many cases that silently failed before now emit errors, spans are tightened, and the errors have help and suggestions.
I tried to address all the cases that users ran into in the tracking issue.
cc #44732
r? @QuietMisdreavus
#[must_use] on traits in stdlib
Based on #55506.
Adds `#[must_use]` attribute to traits in the stdlib:
- `Iterator`
- `Future`
- `FnOnce`
- `Fn`
- `FnMut`
There may be other traits that should have the attribute, but I couldn't find/think of any.
The (currently) single unit test of the compiletest tool was never
executed on CI. At least I couldn't find any references of it in the
logs. This adds a test suite for compiletest so that our tester is
tested, too.
The compiletest tests can then also be executed with:
./x.py test src/tools/compiletest
Fix docs path to PermissionsExt
Couldn't test the link yet, since I didn't figure out how to build std rustdocs without building the entire compiler itself 🙂
Bootstrap: Add testsuite for compiletest tool
This adds a test suite for compiletest so that the tester is tested, too.
The (currently) single unit test of the compiletest tool was never executed
on CI. At least I couldn't find any references of it in the logs.
The compiletest tests can then also be executed with:
./x.py test src/tools/compiletest --stage 0
cc #47606
Add x86_64-unknown-uefi target
This adds a new rustc target-configuration called 'x86_64-unknown_uefi'.
Furthermore, it adds a UEFI base-configuration to be used with other
targets supported by UEFI (e.g., i386, armv7hl, aarch64, itanium, ...).
UEFI systems provide a very basic operating-system environment, meant
to unify how systems are booted. It is tailored for simplicity and fast
setup, as it is only meant to bootstrap other systems. For instance, it
copies most of the ABI from Microsoft Windows, rather than inventing
anything on its own. Furthermore, any complex CPU features are
disabled. Only one CPU is allowed to be up, no interrupts other than
the timer-interrupt are allowed, no process-separation is performed,
page-tables are identity-mapped, ...
Nevertheless, UEFI has an application model. Its main purpose is to
allow operating-system vendors to write small UEFI applications that
load their kernel and terminate the UEFI system. However, many other
UEFI applications have emerged in the past, including network-boot,
debug-consoles, and more.
This UEFI target allows to compile rust code natively as UEFI
applications. No standard library support is added, but libcore can be
used out-of-the-box if a panic-handler is provided. Furthermore,
liballoc works as well, if a `GlobalAlloc` handler is provided. Both
have been tested with this target-configuration.
Note that full libstd support is unlikely to happen. While UEFI does
have standardized interfaces for networking and alike, none of these
are mandatory and they are unlikely to be shipped in common consumer
firmwares. Furthermore, several features like process-separation are
not available (or only in very limited fashion). Those parts of libstd
would have to be masked.
Add short emoji status to toolstate updates
I get a lot of these emails and it's good to know which ones I should be paying closer attention to -- i.e. the ones where clippy breaks. This adds a short emoji status report to the first line of the commit message, which shows up in notifications directly
I haven't been able to test it, and the actual emoji are just suggestions.
r? @kennytm
cc @rust-lang/infra @rust-lang/devtools
Add test of current behavior (infer free region within closure body)
This behavior was previously not encoded in our test suite.
it is pretty important that we test this behavior. In particular, in #56537 I had proposed expanding the lifetime elision rules so that they would apply to some of the cases encoded in this test, which would cause them to start failing to compile successfully (because the lifetime attached to the return type would start being treated as connected to the lifetime on the input parameter to the lambda expression, which is explicitly *not* what the code wants in this particular case).
In other words, I am trying to ensure that anyone who tries such experiments with lifetime elision in the future quickly finds out why we don't support lifetime elision on lambda expressions (at least not in the naive manner described on #56537).
Fix private_no_mangle_fns message grammar
Simply changes "an warning" to "a warning" in the `private_no_mangle_fns` warning. I started getting this in some code after upgrading to 1.31.0.
fix rust-lang/rust issue #50583
Rationale for the fix is in #50583. I've verified that before the fix /musl-armhf/lib/libc.a is riddled with the illegal variant of vmov.f64 and after the fix the version built doesn't contain any of these illegal instructions.
I originally thought that the arm-linux-gnueabi version also needed fixing - to add a -mfloat-abi-soft but that's unnecessary as it's compiled with the gnueabi (not hf) compiler (I've some a quick check that the libc.a produced doesn't include VFP instructions).
r? @alexcrichton
