This also adjusts the lint docs generation to accept (and ignore) an allow
attribute, rather than expecting the documentation to be immediately followed by
the lint name.
Suggest replacing braces for brackets on array-esque invalid block expr
Newcomers may write `{1, 2, 3}` for making arrays, and the current error message is not informative enough to quickly convince them what is needed to fix the error.
This PR implements a diagnostic for this case, and its output looks like this:
```text
error: this code is interpreted as a block expression, not an array
--> src/lib.rs:1:22
|
1 | const FOO: [u8; 3] = {
| ______________________^
2 | | 1, 2, 3
3 | | };
| |_^
|
= note: to define an array, one would use square brackets instead of curly braces
help: try using [] instead of {}
|
1 | const FOO: [u8; 3] = [
2 | 1, 2, 3
3 | ];
|
```
Fix#87672
Fixes#88969
It appears that *just* disabling the evaluation cache (in #88994)
leads to other issues involving intercrate mode caching. I suspect
that since we now always end up performing the full evaluation
in intercrate mode, we end up 'polluting' the candidate and projection
caches with results that depend on being in intercrate mode in some way.
Previously, we might have hit a cached evaluation (stored during
non-intercrate mode), and skipped doing this extra work in
intercrate mode.
The whole situation with intercrate mode caching is turning into
a mess. Ideally, we would remove intercrate mode entirely - however,
this might require waiting on Chalk.
This test required a newer version of cdb than was previously enabled in
CI thus leading to some bitrot in the test since the time it was
originally created. With the update to the `windows-latest` image last
week, we're now running this test in CI and thus uncovered the
regression.
I've updated the test and it now passes.
This fixes compiling things like the `snap` crate after
https://reviews.llvm.org/D105462. I added a test that verifies the
additional attribute gets specified, and confirmed that I can build
cargo with both LLVM 13 and 14 with this change applied.
This just applies the suggested fixes from the compatibility warnings,
leaving any that are in practice spurious in. This is primarily intended to
provide a starting point to identify possible fixes to the migrations (e.g., by
avoiding spurious warnings).
A secondary commit cleans these up where they are false positives (as is true in
many of the cases).
Add initial support for m68k
This patch series adds initial support for m68k making use of the new M68k
backend introduced with LLVM-13. Additional changes will be needed to be
able to actually use the backend for this target.
Specifically, ISO/IEC 9899:2018 — better known as "C18" — (and at least
C11, C99 and C89) do not specify the size of `byte` in bits.
Section 3.6 defines "byte" as "addressable unit of data storage" while
section 6.2.5 ("Types") only defines "char" as "large enough to store
any member of the basic execution set" giving it a lower bound of 7 bit
(since there are 96 characters in the basic execution set).
With section 6.5.3.4 paragraph 4 "When sizeof is applied to an operant
that has type char […] the result is 1" you could read this as the size
of `char` in bits being defined as exactly the same as the number of
bits in a byte but it's also valid to read that as an exception.
In general implementations take `char` as the smallest unit of
addressable memory, which for modern byte-addressed architectures is
overwhelmingly 8 bits to the point of this convention being completely
cemented into just about all of our software.
So is any of this actually relevant at all? I hope not. I sincerely hope
that this never, ever comes up.
But if for some reason a poor rustacean is having to interface with C
code running on a Cray X1 that in 2003 is still doing word-addressed
memory with 64-bit words and they trust the docs here blindly it will
blow up in her face. And I'll be truly sorry for her to have to deal
with … all of that.
Fix debuginfo tests for the latest version of the Windows SDK.
Re-enable the tests that were disabled to fix CI.
Changes:
- Cdb now correctly visualizes enums.
- Cdb doesn't render emoji characters in `OSStr` anymore.
- Cdb doesn't always render `str` correctly (#88840)
Add `ConstraintCategory::Usage` for handling aggregate construction
In some cases, we emit borrowcheck diagnostics pointing
at a particular field expression in a struct expression
(e.g. `MyStruct { field: my_expr }`). However, this
behavior currently relies on us choosing the
`ConstraintCategory::Boring` with the 'correct' span.
When adding additional variants to `ConstraintCategory`,
(or changing existing usages away from `ConstraintCategory::Boring`),
the current behavior can easily get broken, since a non-boring
constraint will get chosen over a boring one.
To make the diagnostic output less fragile, this commit
adds a `ConstraintCategory::Usage` variant. We use this variant
for the temporary assignments created for each field of
an aggregate we are constructing.
Using this new variant, we can emit a message mentioning
"this usage", emphasizing the fact that the error message
is related to the specific use site (in the struct expression).
This is preparation for additional work on improving NLL error messages
(see #57374)
Querify `FnAbi::of_{fn_ptr,instance}` as `fn_abi_of_{fn_ptr,instance}`.
*Note: opening this PR as draft because it's based on #88499*
This more or less replicates the `LayoutOf::layout_of` setup from #88499, to replace `FnAbi::of_{fn_ptr,instance}` with `FnAbiOf::fn_abi_of_{fn_ptr,instance}`, and also route them through queries (which `layout_of` has used for a while).
The two changes at the use sites (other than the names) are:
* return type is now wrapped in `&'tcx`
* the value *is* interned, which may affect performance
* the `extra_args` list is now an interned `&'tcx ty::List<Ty<'tcx>>`
* should be cheap (it's empty for anything other than C variadics)
Theoretically, a `FnAbiOfHelpers` implementer could choose to keep the `Result<...>` instead of eagerly erroring, but the only existing users of these APIs are codegen backends, so they don't (want to) take advantage of this.
At least miri could make use of this, since it prefers propagating errors (it "just" doesn't use `FnAbi` yet - cc `@RalfJung).`
The way this is done is probably less efficient than what is possible, because the queries handle the correctness-oriented API (i.e. the split into `fn` pointers vs instances), whereas a lower-level query could end up with more reuse between different instances with identical signatures.
r? `@nagisa` cc `@oli-obk` `@bjorn3`
Convert `debug_assert` to `assert` in `CachingSourceMapView`
I suspect that there's a bug somewhere in this code, which is
leading to the `predicates_of` ICE being seen in #89035
Gather module items after lowering.
This avoids having a non-local analysis inside lowering.
By implementing `hir_module_items` using a visitor, we make sure that iterations and visitors are consistent.
Rollup of 10 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #87960 (Suggest replacing an inexisting field for an unmentioned field)
- #88855 (Allow simd_shuffle to accept vectors of any length)
- #88966 (Check for shadowing issues involving block labels)
- #88996 (Fix linting when trailing macro expands to a trailing semi)
- #89017 (fix potential race in AtomicU64 time monotonizer)
- #89021 (Add a separate error for `dyn Trait` in `const fn`)
- #89051 (Add intra-doc links and small changes to `std::os` to be more consistent)
- #89053 (refactor: VecDeques IntoIter fields to private)
- #89055 (Suggest better place to add call parentheses for method expressions wrapped in parentheses)
- #89081 (Fix a typo)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Newcomers may write `{1, 2, 3}` for making arrays, and the current error
message is not informative enough to quickly convince them what is
needed to fix the error.
This PR implements a diagnostic for this case, and its output looks like
this:
```text
error: this code is interpreted as a block expression, not an array
--> src/lib.rs:1:22
|
1 | const FOO: [u8; 3] = {
| ______________________^
2 | | 1, 2, 3
3 | | };
| |_^
|
= note: to define an array, one would use square brackets instead of curly braces
help: try using [] instead of {}
|
1 | const FOO: [u8; 3] = [
2 | 1, 2, 3
3 | ];
|
```
Fix#87672
