Implement coherence checks for negative trait impls
The main purpose of this PR is to be able to [move Error trait to core](https://github.com/rust-lang/project-error-handling/issues/3).
This feature is necessary to handle the following from impl on box.
```rust
impl From<&str> for Box<dyn Error> { ... }
```
Without having negative traits affect coherence moving the error trait into `core` and moving that `From` impl to `alloc` will cause the from impl to no longer compiler because of a potential future incompatibility. The compiler indicates that `&str` _could_ introduce an `Error` impl in the future, and thus prevents the `From` impl in `alloc` that would cause overlap with `From<E: Error> for Box<dyn Error>`. Adding `impl !Error for &str {}` with the negative trait coherence feature will disable this error by encoding a stability guarantee that `&str` will never implement `Error`, making the `From` impl compile.
We would have this in `alloc`:
```rust
impl From<&str> for Box<dyn Error> {} // A
impl<E> From<E> for Box<dyn Error> where E: Error {} // B
```
and this in `core`:
```rust
trait Error {}
impl !Error for &str {}
```
r? `@nikomatsakis`
This PR was built on top of `@yaahc` PR #85764.
Language team proposal: to https://github.com/rust-lang/lang-team/issues/96
Remove hir::map::blocks and use FnKind instead
The principal tool is `FnLikeNode`, which is not often used and can be easily implemented using `rustc_hir::intravisit::FnKind`.
Adopt let_else across the compiler
This performs a substitution of code following the pattern:
```
let <id> = if let <pat> = ... { identity } else { ... : ! };
```
To simplify it to:
```
let <pat> = ... { identity } else { ... : ! };
```
By adopting the `let_else` feature (cc #87335).
The PR also updates the syn crate because the currently used version of the crate doesn't support `let_else` syntax yet.
Note: Generally I'm the person who *removes* usages of unstable features from the compiler, not adds more usages of them, but in this instance I think it hopefully helps the feature get stabilized sooner and in a better state. I have written a [comment](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/87335#issuecomment-944846205) on the tracking issue about my experience and what I feel could be improved before stabilization of `let_else`.
Remove redundant member-constraint check
impl trait will, for each lifetime in the hidden type, register a "member constraint" that says the lifetime must be equal or outlive one of the lifetimes of the impl trait. These member constraints will be solved by borrowck
But, as you can see in the big red block of removed code, there was an ad-hoc check for member constraints happening at the site where they get registered. This check had some minor effects on diagnostics, but will fall down on its feet with my big type alias impl trait refactor. So we removed it and I pulled the removal out into a (hopefully) reviewable PR that works on master directly.
This performs a substitution of code following the pattern:
let <id> = if let <pat> = ... { identity } else { ... : ! };
To simplify it to:
let <pat> = ... { identity } else { ... : ! };
By adopting the let_else feature.
Show detailed expected/found types in error message when trait paths are the same
Fixes#65230.
### Issue solved by this PR
```rust
trait T {
type U;
fn f(&self) -> Self::U;
}
struct X<'a>(&'a mut i32);
impl<'a> T for X<'a> {
type U = &'a i32;
fn f(&self) -> Self::U {
self.0
}
}
fn main() {}
```
Compiler generates the following note:
```
note: ...so that the types are compatible
--> test.rs:10:28
|
10 | fn f(&self) -> Self::U {
| ____________________________^
11 | | self.0
12 | | }
| |_____^
= note: expected `T`
found `T`
```
This note is not useful since the expected type and the found type are the same.
### How this PR solve the issue
When the expected type and the found type are exactly the same in string representation, the note falls back to the detailed string representation of trait ref:
```
note: ...so that the types are compatible
--> test.rs:10:28
|
10 | fn f(&self) -> Self::U {
| ____________________________^
11 | | self.0
12 | | }
| |_____^
= note: expected `<X<'a> as T>`
found `<X<'_> as T>`
```
So that a user can notice what was different between the expected one and the found one.
Add two inline annotations for hot functions
These two functions are essentially no-ops (and compile to just a load and
return), but show up in process_obligations profiles with a high call count --
so worthwhile to try and inline them. This is not normally possible as they're
non-generic, so they don't get offered for inlining by our current algorithm.
These two functions are essentially no-ops (and compile to just a load and
return), but show up in process_obligations profiles with a high call count --
so worthwhile to try and inline them away.
This PR has several interconnected pieces:
1. In some of the NLL region error code, we now pass
around an `ObligationCause`, instead of just a plain `Span`.
This gets forwarded into `fulfill_cx.register_predicate_obligation`
during error reporting.
2. The general InferCtxt error reporting code is extended to
handle `ObligationCauseCode::BindingObligation`
3. A new enum variant `ConstraintCategory::Predicate` is added.
We try to avoid using this as the 'best blame constraint' - instead,
we use it to enhance the `ObligationCause` of the `BlameConstraint`
that we do end up choosing.
As a result, several NLL error messages now contain the same
"the lifetime requirement is introduced here" message as non-NLL
errors.
Having an `ObligationCause` available will likely prove useful
for future improvements to NLL error messages.
Be explicit about using Binder::dummy
This is somewhat of a late followup to the binder refactor PR. It removes `ToPredicate` and `ToPolyTraitImpls` that hide the use of `Binder::dummy`. While this does make code a bit more verbose, it allows us be more careful about where we create binders.
Another alternative here might be to add a new trait `ToBinder` or something with a `dummy()` fn. Which could still allow grepping but allows doing something like `trait_ref.dummy()` (but I also wonder if longer-term, it would be better to be even more explicit with a `bind_with_vars(ty::List::empty())` *but* that's not clear yet.
r? ``@nikomatsakis``
Revise never type fallback algorithm
This is a rebase of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/84573, but dropping the stabilization of never type (and the accompanying large test diff).
Each commit builds & has tests updated alongside it, and could be reviewed in a more or less standalone fashion. But it may make more sense to review the PR as a whole, I'm not sure. It should be noted that tests being updated isn't really a good indicator of final behavior -- never_type_fallback is not enabled by default in this PR, so we can't really see the full effects of the commits here.
This combines the work by Niko, which is [documented in this gist](https://gist.github.com/nikomatsakis/7a07b265dc12f5c3b3bd0422018fa660), with some additional rules largely derived to target specific known patterns that regress with the algorithm solely derived by Niko. We build these from an intuition that:
* In general, fallback to `()` is *sound* in all cases
* But, in general, we *prefer* fallback to `!` as it accepts more code, particularly that written to intentionally use `!` (e.g., Result's with a Infallible/! variant).
When evaluating Niko's proposed algorithm, we find that there are certain cases where fallback to `!` leads to compilation failures in real-world code, and fallback to `()` fixes those errors. In order to allow for stabilization, we need to fix a good portion of these patterns.
The final rule set this PR proposes is that, by default, we fallback from `?T` to `!`, with the following exceptions:
1. `?T: Foo` and `Bar::Baz = ?T` and `(): Foo`, then fallback to `()`
2. Per [Niko's algorithm](https://gist.github.com/nikomatsakis/7a07b265dc12f5c3b3bd0422018fa660#proposal-fallback-chooses-between--and--based-on-the-coercion-graph), the "live" `?T` also fallback to `()`.
The first rule is necessary to address a fairly common pattern which boils down to something like the snippet below. Without rule 1, we do not see the closure's return type as needing a () fallback, which leads to compilation failure.
```rust
#![feature(never_type_fallback)]
trait Bar { }
impl Bar for () { }
impl Bar for u32 { }
fn foo<R: Bar>(_: impl Fn() -> R) {}
fn main() {
foo(|| panic!());
}
```
r? `@jackh726`
Migrate in-tree crates to 2021
This replaces #89075 (cherry picking some of the commits from there), and closes#88637 and fixes#89074.
It excludes a migration of the library crates for now (see tidy diff) because we have some pending bugs around macro spans to fix there.
I instrumented bootstrap during the migration to make sure all crates moved from 2018 to 2021 had the compatibility warnings applied first.
Originally, the intent was to support cargo fix --edition within bootstrap, but this proved fairly difficult to pull off. We'd need to architect the check functionality to support running cargo check and cargo fix within the same x.py invocation, and only resetting sysroots on check. Further, it was found that cargo fix doesn't behave too well with "not quite workspaces", such as Clippy which has several crates. Bootstrap runs with --manifest-path ... for all the tools, and this makes cargo fix only attempt migration for that crate. We can't use e.g. --workspace due to needing to maintain sysroots for different phases of compilation appropriately.
It is recommended to skip the mass migration of Cargo.toml's to 2021 for review purposes; you can also use `git diff d6cd2c6c87 -I'^edition = .20...$'` to ignore the edition = 2018/21 lines in the diff.
This just applies the suggested fixes from the compatibility warnings,
leaving any that are in practice spurious in. This is primarily intended to
provide a starting point to identify possible fixes to the migrations (e.g., by
avoiding spurious warnings).
A secondary commit cleans these up where they are false positives (as is true in
many of the cases).
The comment seems incorrect. Testing revealed that the examples in
question still work (as well as some variants) even without the
special casing here.
We now fallback type variables using the following rules:
* Construct a coercion graph `A -> B` where `A` and `B` are unresolved
type variables or the `!` type.
* Let D be those variables that are reachable from `!`.
* Let N be those variables that are reachable from a variable not in
D.
* All variables in (D \ N) fallback to `!`.
* All variables in (D & N) fallback to `()`.
