rustbuild: RISC-V is no longer an experimental LLVM target
This moves RISC-V from the experimental LLVM targets to the
regular LLVM targets. RISC-V was made non-experimental in
https://reviews.llvm.org/rL366399
I have also sorted the list of LLVM targets, and changed the code
around setting llvm_exp_targets (and its default) to match the code
setting llvm_targets (and its default), ensuring future changes to
the defaults, as LLVM targets become stable, affect as few places as
possible.
Given WebAssembly is in `LLVM_ALL_TARGETS` and is therefore built by default (and has been since October 2018), I'm not sure why rust still has it in `experimental-targets`. I'm happy to update this PR to move it into the main list of LLVM targets.
r? @alexcrichton
Change opaque type syntax from `existential type` to type alias `impl Trait`
This implements a new feature gate `type_alias_impl_trait` (this is slightly different from the originally proposed feature name, but matches what has been used in discussion since), deprecating the old `existential_types` feature.
The syntax for opaque types has been changed. In addition, the "existential" terminology has been replaced with "opaque", as per previous discussion and the RFC.
This makes partial progress towards implementing https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/63063.
r? @Centril
Rollup of 7 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #63107 (Added support for armv7-unknown-linux-gnueabi/musleabi)
- #63121 (On `format!()` arg count mismatch provide extra info)
- #63196 (build_helper: try less confusing method names)
- #63206 (remove unsupported test case)
- #63208 (Round generator sizes to a multiple of their alignment)
- #63212 (Pretty print attributes in `print_arg`)
- #63215 (Clarify semantics of mem::zeroed)
Failed merges:
r? @ghost
build_helper: try less confusing method names
build_helper's `*_silent` methods were likely called that way because they do not print the command being run to stdout. [In the original file this all makes sense](046e6874c4 (diff-5c3d6537a43ecae03014e118a7fe3321)). But later it also gained `*_suppressed` methods and the difference between `silent` and `suppressed` is far from clear.
So rename `run` (which prints the command being run) to `run_verbose`. Then we can call the methods that just run a command and show its output but nothing extra `run` and `try_run`.
`run_verbose` (formerly `run`) is unused from what I can tell. Should I remove it?
r? @alexcrichton
Cc @Mark-Simulacrum
Also see https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/63089#discussion_r308018890.
On `format!()` arg count mismatch provide extra info
When positional width and precision formatting flags are present in a
formatting string that has an argument count mismatch, provide extra
information pointing at them making it easiser to understand where the
problem may lay:
```
error: 4 positional arguments in format string, but there are 3 arguments
--> $DIR/ifmt-bad-arg.rs:78:15
|
LL | println!("{} {:.*} {}", 1, 3.2, 4);
| ^^ ^^--^ ^^ --- this parameter corresponds to the precision flag
| |
| this precision flag adds an extra required argument at position 1, which is why there are 4 arguments expected
|
= note: positional arguments are zero-based
= note: for information about formatting flags, visit https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/fmt/index.html
error: 4 positional arguments in format string, but there are 3 arguments
--> $DIR/ifmt-bad-arg.rs:81:15
|
LL | println!("{} {:07$.*} {}", 1, 3.2, 4);
| ^^ ^^-----^ ^^ --- this parameter corresponds to the precision flag
| | |
| | this precision flag adds an extra required argument at position 1, which is why there are 4 arguments expected
| this width flag expects an `usize` argument at position 7, but there are 3 arguments
|
= note: positional arguments are zero-based
= note: for information about formatting flags, visit https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/fmt/index.html
error: invalid reference to positional argument 7 (there are 3 arguments)
--> $DIR/ifmt-bad-arg.rs:84:18
|
LL | println!("{} {:07$} {}", 1, 3.2, 4);
| ^^^--^
| |
| this width flag expects an `usize` argument at position 7, but there are 3 arguments
|
= note: positional arguments are zero-based
= note: for information about formatting flags, visit https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/fmt/index.html
```
Fix#49384.
Added support for armv7-unknown-linux-gnueabi/musleabi
Fixes#63101
Some things that are not done and I hope someone can help me with:
* During the ci build of `armv7-unknown-linux-gnueabi` `openssl` must be built (to build cargo) but `openssl` does not yet support this target. This feels slightly like a chicken-and-egg problem, any feedback is welcome.
* Should I add any tests for any of these targets?
provide thread name to OS for Solarish systems
Fixes#62302
Passes a Linux bootstrap build. python x.py test src/tools/tidy happy.
I tested this with a small test binary that spawns a few threads, and verified
that:
- on an illumos system lacking the libc function, the binary runs but no OS-level
thread names are set
- on an illumos system with the feature, the binary runs, and the thread names are
visible and correct under tools like MDB, pstack, core dump, etc.
Unconfigure compiler unit test files during normal build
I haven't touched libstd though, it had a lot of tests and I'm not sure the people maintaining it want this.
Closes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/61097
r? @Mark-Simulacrum
This commit moves RISC-V from the experimental LLVM targets to the
regular LLVM targets. RISC-V was made non-experimental in
https://reviews.llvm.org/rL366399
I have also sorted the list of LLVM targets, and changed the code
around setting llvm_exp_targets (and its default) to match the code
setting llvm_targets (and its default), ensuring future changes to
the defaults, as LLVM targets become stable, affect as few places as
possible.
Remove redundant method with const variable resolution
I've also removed a `bug!()` in const value relation code and replaced it with a `FIXME`. Now `ConstValue::Slice` and `ConstValue::ByRef` will simply fail to unify rather than ICEing, which seems more user-friendly for testers.
More questionmarks in doctests
This removes the other `unwrap`s in the macro doctests, replacing them with `?`. For now, we need to specify the main function including the return type, we can get rid of that once the return type suggestion for `fn main() { .. }` works correctly.
r? @QuietMisdreavus
