BTreeMap: improve gdb introspection of BTreeMap with ZST keys or values
I accidentally pushed an earlier revision in #77788: it changes the index of tuples for BTreeSet from ""[{}]".format(i) to "key{}".format(i). Which doesn't seem to make the slightest difference on my linux box nor on CI. In fact, gdb doesn't make any distinction between "key{}" and "val{}" for a BTreeMap either, leading to confusing output if you test more. But easy to improve.
r? @Mark-Simulacrum
liballoc: VecDeque: Add binary search functions
I am submitting rust-lang/rfcs#2997 as a PR as suggested by @scottmcm
I haven't yet created a tracking issue - if there's a favorable feedback I'll create one and update the issue links in the unstable attribs.
Remove shrink_to_fit from default ToString::to_string implementation.
As suggested by `@scottmcm` on Zulip. shrink_to_fit() seems like the wrong thing to do here in most use cases of to_string(). Would be intereseting to see if it makes any difference in a timer run.
r? `@joshtriplett`
fix __rust_alloc_error_handler comment
`__rust_alloc_error_handler` was added in the same `extern` block as the allocator functions, but the comment there was not actually correct for `__rust_alloc_error_handler`. So move it down to the rest of the default allocator handling with a fixed comment. At least the comment reflects my understanding of what happens, please check carefully. :)
r? @Amanieu Cc @haraldh
BTreeMap: comment why drain_filter's size_hint is somewhat pessimistic
The `size_hint` of the `DrainFilter` iterator doesn't adjust as you iterate. This hardly seems important to me, but there has been a comparable PR #64383 in the past. I guess a scenario is that you first iterate half the map manually and keep most of the key/value pairs in the map, and then tell the predicate to drain most of the key/value pairs and `.collect` the iterator over the remaining half of the map.
I am totally ambivalent whether this is better or not.
r? @Mark-Simulacrum
Add PartialEq impls for Vec <-> slice
This is a follow-up to #71660 and rust-lang/rfcs#2917 to add two more missing vec/slice PartialEq impls:
```
impl<A, B> PartialEq<[B]> for Vec<A> where A: PartialEq<B> { .. }
impl<A, B> PartialEq<Vec<B>> for [A] where A: PartialEq<B> { .. }
```
Since this is insta-stable, it should go through the `@rust-lang/libs` FCP process. Note that I used version 1.47.0 for the `stable` attribute because I assume this will not merge before the 1.46.0 branch is cut next week.
Replace some once(x).chain(once(y)) with [x, y] IntoIter
Now that we have by-value array iterators that are [already used](25c8c53dd9/compiler/rustc_hir/src/def.rs (L305-L307))...
For example,
```diff
- once(self.type_ns).chain(once(self.value_ns)).chain(once(self.macro_ns)).filter_map(|it| it)
+ IntoIter::new([self.type_ns, self.value_ns, self.macro_ns]).filter_map(|it| it)
```
BTreeMap: admit the existence of leaf edges in comments
The btree code is ambiguous about leaf edges (i.e., edges within leaf nodes). Iteration relies on them heavily, but some of the comments suggest there are no leaf edges (extracted from #77025)
r? @Mark-Simulacrum
BTreeMap: complete the compile-time test_variance test case
Some of the items added to the new `test_sync` belonged in the old `test_variance` as well. And fixed inconsistent paths to nearby modules.
r? @Mark-Simulacrum
Implement Make `handle_alloc_error` default to panic (for no_std + liballoc)
Related: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/66741
Guarded with `#![feature(default_alloc_error_handler)]` a default
`alloc_error_handler` is called, if a custom allocator is used and no
other custom `#[alloc_error_handler]` is defined.
Allow Weak::as_ptr and friends for unsized T
Relaxes `impl<T> Weak<T>` to `impl<T: ?Sized> Weak<T>` for the methods `rc::Weak::as_ptr`, `into_raw`, and `from_raw`.
Follow-up to #73845, which did most of the impl work to make these functions work for `T: ?Sized`.
We still have to adjust the implementation of `Weak::from_raw` here, however, because I missed a use of `ptr.is_null()` previously. This check was necessary when `into`/`from_raw` were first implemented, as `into_raw` returned `ptr::null()` for dangling weak. However, we now just (wrapping) offset dangling weaks' pointers the same as nondangling weak, so the null check is no longer necessary (or even hit). (I can submit just 17a928f as a separate PR if desired.)
As a nice side effect, moves the `fn is_dangling` definition closer to `Weak::new`, which creates the dangling weak.
This technically stabilizes that "something like `align_of_val_raw`" is possible to do. However, I believe the part of the functionality required by these methods here -- specifically, getting the alignment of a pointee from a pointer where it may be dangling iff the pointee is `Sized` -- is uncontroversial enough to stabilize these methods without a way to implement them on stable Rust.
r? `@RalfJung,` who reviewed #73845.
ATTN: This changes (relaxes) the (input) generic bounds on stable fn!
Fix Debug implementations of some of the HashMap and BTreeMap iterator types
HashMap's `ValuesMut`, BTreeMaps `ValuesMut`, IntoValues and `IntoKeys` structs were printing both keys and values on their Debug implementations. But they are iterators over either keys or values. Irrelevant values should not be visible. With this PR, they only show relevant fields.
This fixes#75297.
[Here's an example code.](https://play.rust-lang.org/?version=nightly&mode=debug&edition=2018&gist=0c79356ed860e347a0c1a205616f93b7) This prints this on nightly:
```
ValuesMut { inner: IterMut { range: [(1, "hello"), (2, "goodbye")], length: 2 } }
IntoKeys { inner: [(1, "hello"), (2, "goodbye")] }
IntoValues { inner: [(1, "hello"), (2, "goodbye")] }
[(2, "goodbye"), (1, "hello")]
```
After the patch this example prints these instead:
```
["hello", "goodbye"]
["hello", "goodbye"]
[1, 2]
["hello", "goodbye"]
```
I didn't add test cases for them, since I couldn't see any tests for Debug implementations anywhere. But please let me know if I should add it to a specific place.
r? @dtolnay
Related: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/66741
Guarded with `#![feature(default_alloc_error_handler)]` a default
`alloc_error_handler` is called, if a custom allocator is used and no
other custom `#[alloc_error_handler]` is defined.
The panic message does not contain the size anymore, because it would
pull in the fmt machinery, which would blow up the code size
significantly.
