Add option to enable MIR inlining independently of mir-opt-level
Add `-Zinline-mir` option that enables MIR inlining independently of the
current MIR opt level. The primary use-case is enabling MIR inlining on the
default MIR opt level.
Turn inlining thresholds into optional values to make it possible to configure
different defaults depending on the current mir-opt-level (although thresholds
are yet to be used in such a manner).
The storage markers constitute a substantial portion of all MIR
statements. At the same time, for builds without any optimizations,
the storage markers have no further use during and after MIR
optimization phase.
If storage markers are not necessary for code generation, remove them.
Use small hash set in `mir_inliner_callees`
Use small hash set in `mir_inliner_callees` to avoid temporary
allocation when possible and quadratic behaviour for large number of
callees.
Consider inexpensive inlining criteria first
Refactor inlining decisions so that inexpensive criteria are considered first:
1. Based on code generation attributes.
2. Based on MIR availability (examines call graph).
3. Based on MIR body.
[librustdoc] Only split lang string on `,`, ` `, and `\t`
Split markdown lang strings into tokens on `,`.
The previous behavior was to split lang strings into tokens on any
character that wasn't a `_`, `_`, or alphanumeric.
This is a potentially breaking change, so please scrutinize! See discussion in #78344.
I noticed some test cases that made me wonder if there might have been some reason for the original behavior:
```
t("{.no_run .example}", false, true, Ignore::None, true, false, false, false, v(), None);
t("{.sh .should_panic}", true, false, Ignore::None, false, false, false, false, v(), None);
t("{.example .rust}", false, false, Ignore::None, true, false, false, false, v(), None);
t("{.test_harness .rust}", false, false, Ignore::None, true, true, false, false, v(), None);
```
It seemed pretty peculiar to specifically test lang strings in braces, with all the tokens prefixed by `.`.
I did some digging, and it looks like the test cases were added way back in [this commit from 2014](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/commit/3fef7a74ca9a) by `@skade.`
It looks like they were added just to make sure that the splitting was permissive, and aren't testing that those strings in particular are accepted.
Closes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/78344.
Refactor inlining decisions so that inexpensive criteria are considered first:
1. Based on code generation attributes.
2. Based on MIR availability (examines call graph).
3. Based on MIR body.
Point out implicit deref coercions in borrow
Fixes#81365
`@Aaron1011` I'm not sure why my code shows the note even in an implicit `Deref` call. See the output for `issue-81365-8.rs`.
MIR-OPT: Pass to deduplicate blocks
This pass finds basic blocks that are completely equal,
and replaces all uses with just one of them.
```bash
$ RUSTC_LOG=rustc_mir::transform::deduplicate_blocks ./x.py build --stage 2 | grep "SUCCESS: Replacing: " > log
...
$ cat log | wc -l
23875
```
fix MIR fn-ptr pretty-printing
An uninitialized function pointer would get printed as `{{uninit fn()}` (notice the unbalanced parentheses), and a dangling fn ptr would ICE. This fixes both of that.
However, I have no idea how to add tests for this.
Also, I don't understand this MIR pretty-printing code. Somehow the print function `pretty_print_const_scalar` actually *returns* a transformed form of the const (but there is no doc comment explaining what is being returned); some match arms do `p!` while others do `self =`, and there's a wild mixture of `p!` and `write!`... all very mysterious and confusing.^^
r? ``@oli-obk``
remove useless ?s (clippy::needless_question_marks)
Example code:
```rust
fn opts() -> Option<String> {
let s: Option<String> = Some(String::new());
Some(s?) // this can just be "s"
}
```
