Rather than relying on `getPointerElementType()` from LLVM function
pointers, we now pass the function type explicitly when building `call`
or `invoke` instructions.
Core features cleanup
This sorts and categorizes the `#![features]` in `core` and removes unused ones.
This is part of #87766
The following feature attributes were unnecessary and are removed:
```diff
// Library features:
-#![feature(bool_to_option)]
-#![feature(char_indices_offset)]
-#![feature(pin_deref_mut)]
-#![feature(str_split_as_str)]
-#![feature(str_split_inclusive_as_str)]
// Language features:
-#![feature(arbitrary_self_types)]
-#![feature(custom_inner_attributes)]
-#![feature(nll)]
```
Disable unused variable lint for naked functions
In most calling conventions, accessing function parameters may require
stack access. However, naked functions have no assembly prelude to set
up stack access. This is why naked functions may only contain a single
`asm!()` block. All parameter access is done inside the `asm!()` block,
so we cannot validate the liveness of the input parameters. Therefore,
we should disable the lint for naked functions.
rust-lang/rfcs#2774rust-lang/rfcs#2972
`@joshtriplett` `@Amanieu` `@haraldh`
bootstrap.py: use `git rev-list` for robustness
Use `git rev-list` instead of `git log` to be more robust against
UI changes in git. Also, use the full email address for bors,
because `--author` uses a substring match.
Based on #87513, but is separate because it's less minimal and may require additional manual testing.
~Open questions:~
* ~Should the `merge_base` search also use `--first-parent`?~
* ~Do we exclude non-merge commits from bors? There are a few, and I'm not sure what they have in common. Some of them look like squashes, and some look like they're in rollup branches.~
r? `@jyn514`
`@rustbot` label +A-rustbuild +C-cleanup
Allow more "unknown argument" strings from linker
Some toolchains emit slightly different errors, e.g.
ppc-vle-gcc: error: unrecognized option '-no-pie'
The v0 mangling includes an instantiating crate in a mangled name,
which crates a false positive match for a word `panic`.
Rename crate name / test case to avoid the issue.
Currently there is no API that allows fallible zero-allocation of a Vec.
Vec.try_reserve is not appropriate for this job since it doesn't know
whether it should zero or arbitrary uninitialized memory is fine.
Since Box currently holds most of the zeroing/uninit/slice allocation APIs
it's the best place to add yet another entry into this feature matrix.
rustc: Fill out remaining parts of C-unwind ABI
This commit intends to fill out some of the remaining pieces of the
C-unwind ABI. This has a number of other changes with it though to move
this design space forward a bit. Notably contained within here is:
* On `panic=unwind`, the `extern "C"` ABI is now considered as "may
unwind". This fixes a longstanding soundness issue where if you
`panic!()` in an `extern "C"` function defined in Rust that's actually
UB because the LLVM representation for the function has the `nounwind`
attribute, but then you unwind.
* Whether or not a function unwinds now mainly considers the ABI of the
function instead of first checking the panic strategy. This fixes a
miscompile of `extern "C-unwind"` with `panic=abort` because that ABI
can still unwind.
* The aborting stub for non-unwinding ABIs with `panic=unwind` has been
reimplemented. Previously this was done as a small tweak during MIR
generation, but this has been moved to a separate and dedicated MIR
pass. This new pass will, for appropriate functions and function
calls, insert a `cleanup` landing pad for any function call that may
unwind within a function that is itself not allowed to unwind. Note
that this subtly changes some behavior from before where previously on
an unwind which was caught-to-abort it would run active destructors in
the function, and now it simply immediately aborts the process.
* The `#[unwind]` attribute has been removed and all users in tests and
such are now using `C-unwind` and `#![feature(c_unwind)]`.
I think this is largely the last piece of the RFC to implement.
Unfortunately I believe this is still not stabilizable as-is because
activating the feature gate changes the behavior of the existing `extern
"C"` ABI in a way that has no replacement. My thinking for how to enable
this is that we add support for the `C-unwind` ABI on stable Rust first,
and then after it hits stable we change the behavior of the `C` ABI.
That way anyone straddling stable/beta/nightly can switch to `C-unwind`
safely.
