Update cargo
7 commits in 070e459c2d8b79c5b2ac5218064e7603329c92ae..e931e4796b61de593aa1097649445e535c9c7ee0
2021-05-11 18:12:23 +0000 to 2021-05-24 16:17:27 +0000
- Add `cargo:rustc-link-arg-bin` flag. (rust-lang/cargo#9486)
- Add a cargo-doc.browser config option (rust-lang/cargo#9473)
- Fix bug when with resolver = "1" non-virtual package was allowing unknown features (rust-lang/cargo#9437)
- Add GitHub link to contributor guide. (rust-lang/cargo#9493)
- Add temporary fix for rustup on windows in CI. (rust-lang/cargo#9498)
- 3 typos and some capitalization (rust-lang/cargo#9495)
- fix 6 typos (rust-lang/cargo#9484)
Demote `ControlFlow::{from|into}_try` to `pub(crate)`
They have mediocre names and non-obvious semantics, so personally I don't think they're worth trying to stabilize, and thus might as well just be internal (they're used for convenience in iterator adapters), not something shown in the rustdocs.
I don't think anyone actually wanted to use them outside `core` -- they just got made public-but-unstable along with the whole type in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/76204 that promoted `LoopState` from an internal type to the exposed `ControlFlow` type.
cc https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/75744, the tracking issue they mention.
cc https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/85608, the PR where I'm proposing stabilizing the type.
Fix pointer provenance in <[T]>::copy_within
Previously the `self.as_mut_ptr()` invalidated the pointer created by the first `self.as_ptr()`. This also triggered miri when run with `-Zmiri-track-raw-pointers`
Fix bootstrap using host exe suffix for cargo
When attempting to cross compile rustc (for example, from Linux to Windows) and tell it to build cargo/tools, the following error occurs:
```
thread 'main' panicked at 'src.symlink_metadata() failed with No such file or directory (os error 2)', src/bootstrap/lib.rs:1196:24
```
Relevant part of stack trace:
<details>
```
2: bootstrap::Build::copy
at ./src/bootstrap/lib.rs:1196:24
3: <bootstrap::tool::ToolBuild as bootstrap::builder::Step>::run
at ./src/bootstrap/tool.rs:220:13
```
</details>
If I add `-vvv` (which seemed to be the recommended course for debugging a similar issue according to [zulip logs](https://zulip-archive.rust-lang.org/182449tcompilerhelp/19655failedtobootstrap.html)), it shows:
```
Copy ".../rust/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/stage2-tools/x86_64-pc-windows-gnu/release/cargo" to ".../rust/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/stage2-tools-bin/cargo"
```
and when taking a look at the contents of `build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/stage2-tools/x86_64-pc-windows-gnu/release` it contains `cargo.exe`, but no `cargo`.
I tried to study the surrounding code to make sure this was the intended behavior and while I can't be 100% certain, it does seem that using the exe suffix for the `compiler.host` target instead of the `target` target won't have the desired behavior when cross-compiling to/from Windows.
doc: clarify Mutex::try_lock, etc. errors
Clarify error returns from Mutex::try_lock, RwLock::try_read,
RwLock::try_write to make it more obvious that both poisoning
and the lock being already locked are possible errors.
Avoid CJK legacy fonts in Windows
As metioned in #84035, the default serif CJK font in Windows is meh-looking.
To avoid this, we should use sans-serif font or provide CJK glyph supported font in `rustdoc.css`.
Bring back `x86_64-sun-solaris` target to rustup
Change #82216 removed now deprecated target `x86_64-sun-solaris` from CI, thus making it no longer possible to use `$ rustup target add x86_64-sun-solaris` to install given target (see #85098 for details). Since there should be a period of time between the deprecation and removal, this PR brings it back (while keeping the new one as well).
Please, correct me if I am wrong; my assumption that these Docker scripts are being used to build artifacts later used by `rustup` might be incorrect.
Closes#85098.
Weak's type parameter may dangle on drop
Way back in 34076bc0c9, #\[may_dangle\] was added to Rc\<T\> and Arc\<T\>'s Drop impls. That appears to have been because a test added in #28929 used Arc and Rc with dangling references at drop time. However, Weak was not covered by that test, and therefore no #\[may_dangle\] was forced to be added at the time.
As far as dropping, Weak has *even less need* to interact with the T than Rc and Arc do. Roughly speaking #\[may_dangle\] describes generic parameters that the outer type's Drop impl does not interact with except by possibly dropping them; no other interaction (such as trait method calls on the generic type) is permissible. It's clear this applies to Rc's and Arc's drop impl, which sometimes drop T but otherwise do not interact with one. It applies *even more* to Weak. Dropping a Weak cannot ever cause T's drop impl to run. Either there are strong references still in existence, in which case better not drop the T. Or there are no strong references still in existence, in which case the T would already have been dropped previously by the drop of the last strong count.
This test reproduces post-monomorphization errors one can encounter
when using incorrect immediate arguments to some of the stdarch
intrinsics using const generics.
Emit a diagnostic when the monomorphized item collector
encounters errors during a step of the recursive item collection.
These post-monomorphization errors otherwise only show the
erroneous expression without a trace, making them very obscure
and hard to pinpoint whenever they happen in dependencies.
deal with `const_evaluatable_checked` in `ConstEquate`
Failing to evaluate two constants which do not contain inference variables should not result in ambiguity.
Remove doubled braces in non_exhaustive structs’ documentation text.
In commit 4b80687854 (part of Rust 1.52.1) many calls to `write!(w,` were replaced with `w.write_str(`, but this one contained braces that were doubled to escape them when taken as a format string, and so changing the call without changing the text caused them to become doubled in the final HTML output.
I examined `print_item.rs` and the diff of that prior commit for any other occurrences of this mistake and I did not find any.
Better English for documenting when to use unimplemented!()
I don't think "plan of using" is correct here. I considered "plan on using" but eventually decided "plan to use" is better.
Use TargetTriple::from_path in rustdoc
This fixes the problem reported in https://github.com/Rust-for-Linux/linux/pull/272 where rustdoc requires the absolute path of a target spec json instead of accepting a relative path like rustc.
