Changes:
* add licence;
* remove usage of libc and unsafe;
* use BufferedWriter to improve performance;
* use a DummyWriter to cancel binary output in test.
If any of the digits was one past the maximum (e.g. 10**9 for base 10),
then this wasn't detected correctly and so the length of the digit was
one more than expected, causing a very large allocation.
Fixes#10522.
Fixes#10288.
- Cause `0` to be considered a valid integer literal (it is).
- Add octal literals (missed from #10243).
I have *not* modified doc/po/rust.md.pot or doc/po/ja/rust.md.po at all;
they already seem to be out of date so it's easier to ignore them for
myself. I can update them if desired, of course.
Changes:
* add licence;
* remove usage of libc and unsafe;
* use BufferedWriter to improve performance;
* use a DummyWriter to cancel binary output in test.
These commits create a `Buffer` trait in the `io` module which represents an I/O reader which is internally buffered. This abstraction is used to reasonably implement `read_line` and `read_until` along with at least an ok implementation of `read_char` (although I certainly haven't benchmarked `read_char`).
If any of the digits was one past the maximum (e.g. 10**9 for base 10),
then this wasn't detected correctly and so the length of the digit was
one more than expected, causing a very large allocation.
Fixes#10522.
Fixes#10288.
- Cause `0` to be considered a valid integer literal (it is).
- Add octal literals (missed from #10243).
I have *not* modified doc/po/rust.md.pot or doc/po/ja/rust.md.po at all;
they already seem to be out of date so it's easier to ignore them for
myself. I can update them if desired, of course.
Largely, this is just being more specific about where tags get searched
for to remove external dependencies like src/llvm, which reduces the
number of tags *enormously* and significantly increases the usefulness
of the tags file as it is then focusing on 240K lines of Rust code
and 4.5K of C++ rather than just shy of 1M lines of C++ code (mostly
from LLVM) and another 100K lines of Rust tests and a diverse collection
of other languages.
src/rustllvm/RustWrapper.cpp and src/rustllvm/PassWrapper.cpp are
getting tags made, but I'm not sure if that's desirable or not. At
worst, it's not a significant wrong.
A future, desirable step is producing tags for just libstd and libextra
for the use of people using Rust-the-language rather than working on
Rust itself.
This implementation of the meteor contest implements:
- insertion check with bit trick;
- pregenetation of every feasible placement of the pieces on the
board;
- filtering of placement that implies unfeasible board
- central symetry breaking
related to #2776
I've started working on this issue and pushed a small commit, which adds a range check for integer literals in `middle::const_eval` (no `uint` at the moment)
At the moment, this patch is just a proof of concept, I'm not sure if there is a better function for the checks in `middle::const_eval`. This patch does not check for overflows after constant folding, eg:
let x: i8 = 99 + 99;
Bare functions are another example of a scalar but non-numeric
type (like char) that should be handled separately in casts.
This disallows expressions like `0 as extern "Rust" fn() -> int;`.
It might be advantageous to allow casts between bare functions
and raw pointers in unsafe code in the future, to pass function
pointers between Rust and C.
Closes#8728
This implementation of the meteor contest implements:
- insertion check with bit trick;
- pregenetation of every feasible placement of the pieces on the
board;
- filtering of placement that implies unfeasible board
- central symetry breaking
Rename {struct-update,fsu}-moves-and-copies, since win32
failed to run the test since UAC prevents any executable whose
name contaning "update". (#10452)
Some tests related to #9205 are expected to fail on gcc 4.8,
so they are marked as `xfail-win32` instead of `xfail-fast`.
Some tests using `extra::tempfile` fail on win32 due to #10462.
Mark them as `xfail-win32`.
This commit re-organizes the io::native module slightly in order to have a
working implementation of rtio::IoFactory which uses native implementations. The
goal is to seamlessly multiplex among libuv/native implementations wherever
necessary.
Right now most of the native I/O is unimplemented, but we have existing bindings
for file descriptors and processes which have been hooked up. What this means is
that you can now invoke println!() from libstd with no local task, no local
scheduler, and even without libuv.
There's still plenty of work to do on the native I/O factory, but this is the
first steps into making it an official portion of the standard library. I don't
expect anyone to reach into io::native directly, but rather only std::io
primitives will be used. Each std::io interface seamlessly falls back onto the
native I/O implementation if the local scheduler doesn't have a libuv one
(hurray trait ojects!)
This commit re-organizes the io::native module slightly in order to have a
working implementation of rtio::IoFactory which uses native implementations. The
goal is to seamlessly multiplex among libuv/native implementations wherever
necessary.
Right now most of the native I/O is unimplemented, but we have existing bindings
for file descriptors and processes which have been hooked up. What this means is
that you can now invoke println!() from libstd with no local task, no local
scheduler, and even without libuv.
There's still plenty of work to do on the native I/O factory, but this is the
first steps into making it an official portion of the standard library. I don't
expect anyone to reach into io::native directly, but rather only std::io
primitives will be used. Each std::io interface seamlessly falls back onto the
native I/O implementation if the local scheduler doesn't have a libuv one
(hurray trait ojects!)
This test was failing periodically on windows and other platforms, and in
debugging the issue locally I've found that the previous test was failing
at the assertion `ns0 <= ns1`. Upon inspecting the values, the two numbers were
very close to one another, but off by a little bit.
I believe that this is because `precise_time_s` goes from `u64` -> `f64` and
then we go again back to `u64` for the assertion. This conversion is a lossy one
that's not always guaranteed to succeed, so instead I've changed the test to
only compare against u64 instances.
