Append .dwp to the binary filename instead of replacing the existing extension.
gdb et al. expect to find the dwp file at `<binary>`.dwp, even if <binary> already has an extension (e.g. libfoo.so's dwp is expected to be at libfoo.so.dwp).
Rollup of 11 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #106407 (Improve proc macro attribute diagnostics)
- #106960 (Teach parser to understand fake anonymous enum syntax)
- #107085 (Custom MIR: Support binary and unary operations)
- #107086 (Print PID holding bootstrap build lock on Linux)
- #107175 (Fix escaping inference var ICE in `point_at_expr_source_of_inferred_type`)
- #107204 (suggest qualifying bare associated constants)
- #107248 (abi: add AddressSpace field to Primitive::Pointer )
- #107272 (Implement ObjectSafe and WF in the new solver)
- #107285 (Implement `Generator` and `Future` in the new solver)
- #107286 (ICE in new solver if we see an inference variable)
- #107313 (Add Style Team Triagebot config)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
InstCombine away intrinsic validity assertions
This optimization (currently) fires 246 times on the standard library. It seems to fire hardly at all on the big crates in the benchmark suite. Interesting.
...and remove it from `PointeeInfo`, which isn't meant for this.
There are still various places (marked with FIXMEs) that assume all pointers
have the same size and alignment. Fixing this requires parsing non-default
address spaces in the data layout string, which will be done in a followup.
gdb et al. expect to find the dwp file at <binary>.dwp, even if <binary> already
has an extension (e.g. libfoo.so's dwp is expected to be at libfoo.so.dwp).
The optimization that removes artifacts when building libraries is correct
from the compiler's perspective but not from a debugger's perspective.
Unpacked split debuginfo is referred to by filename and debuggers need
the artifact that contains debuginfo to continue to exist at that path.
Ironically the test expects the correct behavior but it was not running.
Fix aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu_ilp32 target
This was broken because the synthetic object files produced by rustc were for 64-bit AArch64, which caused link failures when combined with 32-bit ILP32 object files.
This PR updates the object crate to 0.30.1 which adds support for generating ILP32 AArch64 object files.
riscv: Fix ELF header flags
The previous version added both `EF_RISCV_FLOAT_ABI_DOUBLE` and `EF_RISCV_RVC` if the "D" extension was enabled on riscv64 targets. riscv32 targets were not accounted for. This patch changes this so that:
- Only add `EF_RISCV_RVC` if the "C" extension is enabled
- Add `EF_RISCV_FLOAT_ABI_SINGLE` if the "F" extension is enabled and the "D" extension is not
- Add these ELF flags for riscv32 as well
Fixes#104284
r? rust-lang/risc-v
Linker drivers such as gcc, clang or lld often have a version postfix,
e.g clang-12. The previous logic would not account for this and would
fall back to guessing the linker flavor to be the default linker flavor
for the target, which causes linker errors when this is not the case.
By accounting for the possible version postfix and also considering
g++ and clang++, we considerably reduce the amount of times the
fallback guess has to be used.
To simplify matching check for a version postfix and match against the
linker stem without any version postfix.
In contrast to gcc, clang supports all architectures in one binary.
This means there are no variants like `aarch64-linux-gnu-clang` and
there is no need to check for `-clang` variants.
The previous version added both `EF_RISCV_FLOAT_ABI_DOUBLE` and
`EF_RISCV_RVC` if the "D" extension was enabled on riscv64 targets.
riscv32 targets were not accounted for. This patch changes this
so that:
- Only add `EF_RISCV_RVC` if the "C" extension is enabled
- Add `EF_RISCV_FLOAT_ABI_SINGLE` if the "F" extension is enabled
and the "D" extension is not
- Add these ELF flags for riscv32 as well
Allow codegen to unsize `dyn*` to `dyn`
`dyn* Trait` is just another type that implements `Trait`, so we should be able to unsize `&dyn* Trait` into `&dyn Trait` perfectly fine, same for `Box` and other unsizeable types.
Fixes#106488
This was broken because the synthetic object files produced by rustc
were for 64-bit AArch64, which caused link failures when combined with
32-bit ILP32 object files.
This PR updates the object crate to 0.30.1 which adds support for
generating ILP32 AArch64 object files.
Migrate `codegen_ssa` to diagnostics structs - [Part 3]
Completes migrating `codegen_ssa` module except 2 outstanding errors that depend on other crates:
1. [`rustc_middle::mir::interpret::InterpError`](b6097f2e1b/compiler/rustc_middle/src/mir/interpret/error.rs (L475)): I saw `rustc_middle` is unassigned, I am open to take this work.
2. `codegen_llvm`'s use of `fn span_invalid_monomorphization_error`, which I started to replace in the [last commit](9a31b3cdda) of this PR, but would like to know the team's preference on how we should keep replacing the other macros:
2.1. Update macros to expect a `Diagnostic`
2.2. Remove macros and expand the code on each use.
See [some examples of the different options in this experimental commit](64aee83e80)
_Part 2 - https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/103792_
r? ``@davidtwco``
Cc ``@compiler-errors``
Small fixes for --crate-type staticlib
The first commit doesn't have an effect until we start translating error messages. The second commit fixes potential linker errors when combining `--crate-type staticlib` with another crate type and I think `-Cprefer-dynamic`.
On macOS, it's not yet clear which cases of clang/OS/target/SDK version impact
how to find ld/lld/rust-lld. The --target is not needed on our current targets with
a vanilla config, but may be in some cases. Specifying it all the time breaks the 10.7+
targets on x64 macOS.
We try to only specify it on macOS if the linker flavors are different,
for possible cases of cross-compilation with `-Zgcc-ld=lld` but the
expectation is that it should be passed manually when needed in these
situations.
Don't perform invalid checks in `codegen_attrs`
The attributes `#[track_caller]` and `#[cmse_nonsecure_entry]` are only valid on functions. When validating one of these attributes, codegen_attrs previously called `fn_sig`, [which can only be used on functions](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/105201), on the item the attribute was attached to, assuming that the item was a function without checking. This led to [ICEs in situations where the attribute was incorrectly used on non-functions](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/105594).
With this change, we skip calling `fn_sig` if the item the attribute is attached to must be a function but isn't, because `check_attr` will reject such cases without codegen_attrs's intervention.
As a side note, some of the attributes in codegen_attrs are only valid on functions, but that property isn't actually checked. I'm planning to fix that in a follow up PR since it's a behavior change that will need to be validated rather than an obvious bugfix. Thankfully, all the attributes like that I've found so far are unstable.
Fixes#105594.
r? `@cjgillot`
Remove wrapper functions for some unstable options
They are trivial and just forward to the option. Like most other options, we can just access it directly.
abort immediately on bad mem::zeroed/uninit
Now that we have non-unwinding panics, let's use them for these assertions. This re-establishes the property that `mem::uninitialized` and `mem::zeroed` will never unwind -- the earlier approach of causing panics here sometimes led to hard-to-debug segfaults when the surrounding code was not able to cope with the unexpected unwinding.
Cc `@bjorn3` I did not touch cranelift but I assume it needs a similar patch. However it has a `codegen_panic` abstraction that I did not want to touch since I didn't know how else it is used.
Rename `assert_uninit_valid` intrinsic
It's not about "uninit" anymore but about "filling with 0x01 bytes" so the name should at least try to reflect that.
This is actually not fully correct though, as it does still panic for all uninit with `-Zstrict-init-checks`. I'm not sure what the best way is to deal with that not causing confusion. I guess we could just remove the flag? I don't think having it makes a lot of sense anymore with the direction that we have chose to go. It could be relevant again if #100423 lands so removing it may be a bit over eager.
r? `@RalfJung`
