Core features cleanup
This sorts and categorizes the `#![features]` in `core` and removes unused ones.
This is part of #87766
The following feature attributes were unnecessary and are removed:
```diff
// Library features:
-#![feature(bool_to_option)]
-#![feature(char_indices_offset)]
-#![feature(pin_deref_mut)]
-#![feature(str_split_as_str)]
-#![feature(str_split_inclusive_as_str)]
// Language features:
-#![feature(arbitrary_self_types)]
-#![feature(custom_inner_attributes)]
-#![feature(nll)]
```
Disable unused variable lint for naked functions
In most calling conventions, accessing function parameters may require
stack access. However, naked functions have no assembly prelude to set
up stack access. This is why naked functions may only contain a single
`asm!()` block. All parameter access is done inside the `asm!()` block,
so we cannot validate the liveness of the input parameters. Therefore,
we should disable the lint for naked functions.
rust-lang/rfcs#2774rust-lang/rfcs#2972
`@joshtriplett` `@Amanieu` `@haraldh`
bootstrap.py: use `git rev-list` for robustness
Use `git rev-list` instead of `git log` to be more robust against
UI changes in git. Also, use the full email address for bors,
because `--author` uses a substring match.
Based on #87513, but is separate because it's less minimal and may require additional manual testing.
~Open questions:~
* ~Should the `merge_base` search also use `--first-parent`?~
* ~Do we exclude non-merge commits from bors? There are a few, and I'm not sure what they have in common. Some of them look like squashes, and some look like they're in rollup branches.~
r? `@jyn514`
`@rustbot` label +A-rustbuild +C-cleanup
Allow more "unknown argument" strings from linker
Some toolchains emit slightly different errors, e.g.
ppc-vle-gcc: error: unrecognized option '-no-pie'
rustc: Fill out remaining parts of C-unwind ABI
This commit intends to fill out some of the remaining pieces of the
C-unwind ABI. This has a number of other changes with it though to move
this design space forward a bit. Notably contained within here is:
* On `panic=unwind`, the `extern "C"` ABI is now considered as "may
unwind". This fixes a longstanding soundness issue where if you
`panic!()` in an `extern "C"` function defined in Rust that's actually
UB because the LLVM representation for the function has the `nounwind`
attribute, but then you unwind.
* Whether or not a function unwinds now mainly considers the ABI of the
function instead of first checking the panic strategy. This fixes a
miscompile of `extern "C-unwind"` with `panic=abort` because that ABI
can still unwind.
* The aborting stub for non-unwinding ABIs with `panic=unwind` has been
reimplemented. Previously this was done as a small tweak during MIR
generation, but this has been moved to a separate and dedicated MIR
pass. This new pass will, for appropriate functions and function
calls, insert a `cleanup` landing pad for any function call that may
unwind within a function that is itself not allowed to unwind. Note
that this subtly changes some behavior from before where previously on
an unwind which was caught-to-abort it would run active destructors in
the function, and now it simply immediately aborts the process.
* The `#[unwind]` attribute has been removed and all users in tests and
such are now using `C-unwind` and `#![feature(c_unwind)]`.
I think this is largely the last piece of the RFC to implement.
Unfortunately I believe this is still not stabilizable as-is because
activating the feature gate changes the behavior of the existing `extern
"C"` ABI in a way that has no replacement. My thinking for how to enable
this is that we add support for the `C-unwind` ABI on stable Rust first,
and then after it hits stable we change the behavior of the `C` ABI.
That way anyone straddling stable/beta/nightly can switch to `C-unwind`
safely.
In most calling conventions, accessing function parameters may require
stack access. However, naked functions have no assembly prelude to set
up stack access. This is why naked functions may only contain a single
`asm!()` block. All parameter access is done inside the `asm!()` block,
so we cannot validate the liveness of the input parameters. Therefore,
we should disable the lint for naked functions.
rust-lang/rfcs#2774rust-lang/rfcs#2972
This test proves that naked functions are treated the same as regular
functions regarding unused function parameters. We will change this
behavior in the next patch.
#[inline] slice::Iter::advance_by
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/87387#issuecomment-891942661 was marked as a regression. One of the methods in the PR was missing an inline annotation unlike all the other methods on slice iterators.
Let's see if that makes a difference.
Make wrapping_neg() use wrapping_sub(), #[inline(always)]
This is a follow-up change to the fix for #75598. It simplifies the implementation of wrapping_neg() for all integer types by just calling 0.wrapping_sub(self) and always inlines it. This leads to much less assembly code being emitted for opt-level≤1 and thus much better performance for debug-compiled code.
Background is [this discussion on the internals forum](https://internals.rust-lang.org/t/why-does-rust-generate-10x-as-much-unoptimized-assembly-as-gcc/14930).
Remove unnecessary trailing whitespace from error messages
Some error messages currently contain unnecessary trailing whitespace. There are some legitimate reasons for having trailing whitespace in the output, such as for uniform indentation of possibly-empty input lines, but the whitespace I have addressed here occurs in a line used only for spacing, and I see no reason why that should have trailing whitespace (spacing lines inserted in other places also don't have trailing whitespace).
I have also removed a superfluous call to `buffer.putc()`, which has no effect because the same character is already placed there by `draw_col_separator()`.
Use `git diff --ignore-space-at-eol` to see my changes; otherwise the diff is quite large due to the whitespace removed from expected outputs in `src/test/ui/`.
Allow labeled loops as value expressions for `break`
Fixes#86948. This is currently allowed:
```rust
return 'label: loop { break 'label 42; };
break ('label: loop { break 'label 42; });
break 1 + 'label: loop { break 'label 42; };
break 'outer 'inner: loop { break 'inner 42; };
```
But not this:
```rust
break 'label: loop { break 'label 42; };
```
I have fixed this, so that the above now parses as an unlabeled break with a labeled loop as its value expression.
rustc: Replace `HirId`s with `LocalDefId`s in `AccessLevels` tables
and passes using those tables - primarily privacy checking, stability checking and dead code checking.
All these passes work with definitions rather than with arbitrary HIR nodes.
r? `@cjgillot`
cc `@lambinoo` (#87487)
Test dropping union fields more
Now that #87403 is merged, a few more tests can be added for reads/writes to dropping union fields.
r? ``@LeSeulArtichaut``
Remove the aarch64 `crypto` target_feature
The subfeatures `aes` or `sha2` should be used instead.
This can't yet be done for ARM targets as some LLVM intrinsics still require `crypto`.
Also update the runtime feature detection tests in `library/std` to mirror the updates in `stdarch`. This also helps https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/86941
r? ``@Amanieu``
Rustdoc accessibility: use an icon for the [-]/[+] controls
This is a reopening of #87207 with improvement for the way of generating the `background-image` CSS property.
I quote from the original PR:
> This way, we can show the plus and minus buttons on screens, while voice
> control will read off actual words "Collapse" and "Expand" instead of reading
> "open brace minus close brace" and "open brace plus close brace".
Part of #87059
r? ``@notriddle``
