Fix false positive in derive_hash_xor_eq
This fixes a false positive in derive_hash_xor_eq where the lint was
triggering on user-defined traits called `Hash`.
changelog: Fix false positive in `derive_hash_xor_eq`
Fixes#4658
Fix check_infinite_loop (while_immutable_condition) by checking for break or return inside loop body
changelog: Fix check_infinite_loop (while_immutable_condition) by checking for break or return inside loop body
fixes#4648
Run ./util/dev
Revert changelog entry
Rename lint to same_functions_in_if_condition and add a doc example
Add testcases with different arg in fn invocation
added documentation
minor style fix
change as to ::from
add ignore to doc
include threshold in lint message/make suggestion more apparent/use Scalar api instead of matching
style fix
shange snippet_opt to snippet
Fix false positive in explicit_counter_loop lint
When the counter was used in a closure after the loop the lint didn't detect the
usage of the counter correctly.
changelog: Fix false positive in `explicit_counter_loop`
Fixes#4732
restriction lint for `std::process::exit`
Addition to #4655 - adds the lint checking for `std::process::exit`
changelog: add restriction lint for `std::process::exit`
build: improve script and travis config
* fix a diff failure on windows
See https://travis-ci.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/jobs/245971932#L1625
for an example.
* use cmp instead of diff > /dev/null
* clone single branch instead of clone then checking out
* do not decrypt key if have no diff change
changelog: none
Add lint for debug_assert_with_mut_call
closes#1526
**What does not work:**
* detecting a mut call in the format string itself, e.g. `debug_assert!(false, "{}", vec![1].pop())`
* detecting `*mut T` usage (pointer)
---
changelog: add new lint `debug_assert_with_mut_call`
Fix suggestion of `explicit_counter_loop`
changelog: In the suggestion of `explicit_counter_loop`, if the `for` loop argument doesn't implement `Iterator`, then we suggest `x.into_iter().enumerate()` (or `x.iter{_mut}()` as appropriate). Also, the span of the suggestion has been corrected.
Fixes#4678
This lint will complain when you put a mutable function/method call
inside a `debug_assert` macro, because it will not be executed in
release mode, therefore it will change the execution flow, which is not
wanted.
`must_use_unit` lints unit-returning functions with a `#[must_use]`
attribute, suggesting to remove it.
`double_must_use` lints functions with a plain `#[must_use]`
attribute, but which return a type which is already `#[must_use]`,
so the attribute has no benefit.
`must_use_candidate` is a pedantic lint that lints functions and
methods that return some non-unit type that is not already
`#[must_use]` and suggests to add the annotation.
Lints when, on the RHS of a BinOp, there is a UnOp without a space
before the operator but with a space after (e.g. foo >- 1).
Signed-off-by: Nikos Filippakis <nikolaos.filippakis@cern.ch>
Add assert message to suggestion in lint assertions_on_constants
<!--
Thank you for making Clippy better!
We're collecting our changelog from pull request descriptions.
If your PR only updates to the latest nightly, you can leave the
`changelog` entry as `none`. Otherwise, please write a short comment
explaining your change.
If your PR fixes an issue, you can add "fixes #issue_number" into this
PR description. This way the issue will be automatically closed when
your PR is merged.
If you added a new lint, here's a checklist for things that will be
checked during review or continuous integration.
- [x] Followed [lint naming conventions][lint_naming]
- [x] Added passing UI tests (including committed `.stderr` file)
- [ ] `cargo test` passes locally
- [x] Executed `./util/dev update_lints`
- [ ] Added lint documentation
- [ ] Run `./util/dev fmt`
[lint_naming]: https://rust-lang.github.io/rfcs/0344-conventions-galore.html#lints
Note that you can skip the above if you are just opening a WIP PR in
order to get feedback.
Delete this line and everything above before opening your PR -->
- [x] suggest replacing `assert!(false, "msg")` with `panic!("msg")`
- [x] extend to allow ~~variables~~ any expression for `"msg"`
- ~~suggest replacing `assert!(false, "msg {}", "arg")` with `panic!("msg {}", "arg")`~~
changelog: add assert message to suggestion in lint assertions_on_constants
Work towards fixing: #3575
account for doc visibility
This fixes#4608.
Also I noticed that the lint failed to look at trait and impl items. There's a small bit of fallout in the code, too, but not enough to warrant its own commit.
changelog: check docs of trait items and impl items, also make `missing_safety_doc` account for visibility
Add check for assert_eq macros to unit_cmp lint
changelog: Add check for unit comparisons through `assert_eq!`, `debug_assert_eq!`, `assert_ne!` and `debug_assert_ne!` macros to unit_cmp lint.
fixes#4481
Add a new lint for comparison chains
changelog: Adds a new lint: `comparison_chain`.
`comparison_chain` lints all `if` conditional chains where all the conditions are binary comparisons on the same two operands and will suggest a rewrite with `match`.
Closes#4531.
#4542 remove machine applicable suggestion
This helps #4542 (but does not completely resolve) by removing the machine applicable suggestion (which was incorrect) for that case.
I would have preferred to fix the machine applicable suggestion to handle format strings, but that's a bit beyond my current understanding of the clippy codebase. I'd be happy to give it a try given some guidance.
changelog: only produce machine applicable suggestions on `explicit_write` lint
Changes cast-lossless to a pedantic lint
As discussed in #4528, this moves the cast-lossless lint from `all` to `pedantic`.
I couldn't tell from description alone if it should also be removed from the complexity category, so I left it as part of complexity for now. I didn't see any impact to the tests from this change, but I could be wrong (as this is my first PR).
fixes#4528
changelog: Moves cast-lossless from default to checking only as a `pedantic` lint.
Fix incorrect swap suggestion
Clippy suggests using swap on fields belonging to the same owner causing two mutable borrows of the owner.
Disclosure: This is my first time working with clippy and rusts HIR. I'm very grateful for assistance and suggestions to improve the PR.
fixes#981
changelog: Fix false positive in `manual_swap` lint
New `is_integer_const` to check more const ints
This mostly affects loop checks and the modulo_one lint. Tests were also updated where applicable.
changelog: none
Allow block_in_if_{stmt,expr} in external macro
I found this by running `cargo fix --clippy` on quite a big codebase.
You could refactor this assert to
```rust
let block_expr = _;
assert!(block_expr);
```
but,
1. it doesn't increase the readability IMO
2. That isn't possible in a `debug_assert!`
I'm not sure though, if we should allow this for macros in general or just for external macros.
changelog: Allow `block_in_if_{stmt,expr}` in external macros
Fix missing_const_for_fn false positive
We don't want to lint if the type of the method implements drop.
(constant functions cannot evaluate destructors)
changelog: Fix `missing_const_for_fn` false positive
Fixes#4449
More rustfix tests
<!--
Thank you for making Clippy better!
We're collecting our changelog from pull request descriptions.
If your PR only updates to the latest nightly, you can leave the
`changelog` entry as `none`. Otherwise, please write a short comment
explaining your change.
If your PR fixes an issue, you can add "fixes #issue_number" into this
PR description. This way the issue will be automatically closed when
your PR is merged.
If you added a new lint, here's a checklist for things that will be
checked during review or continuous integration.
- [ ] Followed [lint naming conventions][lint_naming]
- [ ] Added passing UI tests (including committed `.stderr` file)
- [ ] `cargo test` passes locally
- [ ] Executed `./util/dev update_lints`
- [ ] Added lint documentation
- [ ] Run `./util/dev fmt`
[lint_naming]: https://rust-lang.github.io/rfcs/0344-conventions-galore.html#lints
Note that you can skip the above if you are just opening a WIP PR in
order to get feedback.
Delete this line and everything above before opening your PR -->
cc #3630
This is probably easier reviewed per-commit.
changelog: none
Split up cmp_owned tests, add run-rustfix
Some of the cmp_owned tests emitted non-machine-applicable suggestions,
so I moved them to `tests/ui/cmp_owned/without_suggestion.rs` and added
`// run-rustfix` to the other half.
changelog: none
cc #3630
Fix unused_unit false positive
changelog: Fix `unused_unit` false positive
For some reason the `expr` of `stmt.node` didn't contain the expansion information, but the `stmt.span` does.
Fixes#4076
Account for trait alias when looking for defid
I hit the crash on the `expect` call when running clippy on rustc libcore.
Hopefully this will fix it.
changelog: none
Some of the cmp_owned tests emitted non-machine-applicable suggestions,
so I moved them to `tests/ui/cmp_owned/without_suggestion.rs` and added
`// run-rustfix` to the other half.
cc #3630
Fix some suggestions for redundant_pattern_matching
.. and change the Applicability to `MaybeIncorrect`.
Fixes the problem displayed in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/4344#issuecomment-519206388.
We now append `{}` to the suggestion so that the conditional has the
correct syntax again.
(If we were to _remove_ the `if` instead, it would trigger the
`unused_must_use` warning for `#[must_use]` types.)
changelog: Fix some suggestions for `redundant_pattern_matching`
Fixes the problem displayed in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/4344#issuecomment-519206388.
We now append `{}` to the suggestion so that the conditional has the
correct syntax again.
(If we were to _remove_ the `if` instead, it would trigger the
`unused_must_use` warning for `#[must_use]` types.
Add autofixable suggestion for unseparated integer literal suffixes
changelog: Add autofixable suggestion for unseparated integer literal suffixes
Somewhat WIP, since I haven't been able to get this working when adding `// run-rustfix` to `ui/literals.rs`. I think the issue is that there are multiple suggestions operating on one numerical literal, and I'm not sure what the best approach is to work around that.
Thanks
