Turn non_fmt_panic into a future_incompatible edition lint.
This turns the `non_fmt_panic` lint into a future_incompatible edition lint, so it becomes part of the `rust_2021_compatibility` group. See https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/85894.
This lint produces both warnings about semantical changes (e.g. `panic!("{{")`) and things that will become hard errors (e.g. `panic!("{")`). So I added a `explain_reason: false` that supresses the default "this will become a hard error" or "the semantics will change" message, and instead added a note depending on the situation. (cc `@rylev)`
r? `@nikomatsakis`
Fix `future_prelude_collision` false positive
Fixes#86633
The lint for checking if method resolution of methods named `try_into` will fail in 2021 edition previously would fire on all inherent methods, however for inherent methods that consume `self`, this takes priority over `TryInto::try_into` due to being inherent, while trait method and methods that take `&self` or `&mut self` don't take priority, and thus aren't affected by this false positive.
This fix is rather simple: simply checking if the inherent method doesn't auto-deref or auto-ref (and thus takes `self`) and if so, prevents the lint from firing.
Add support for OpenSSL 3.0.0
This updates the `openssl` and `openssl-sys` crates to support building
the toolchain with system libraries up to OpenSSL 3.0.0. This does not
affect the static version used via `openssl-src` in CI builds.
ref: https://github.com/sfackler/rust-openssl/pull/1264
Rollup of 6 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #86206 (Fix type checking of return expressions outside of function bodies)
- #86358 (fix pretty print for `loop`)
- #86568 (Don't dist miri or rust-analyzer on stable or beta.)
- #86683 (⬆️ rust-analyzer)
- #86687 (Allow anyone to set `perf-regression` label)
- #86688 (Add a regression test for issue-65384)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Don't dist miri or rust-analyzer on stable or beta.
This prevents miri and rust-analyzer from being built for "dist" or "install" on the stable/beta channels. It is a nightly-only tool and should not be included.
Closes#86286
Fix type checking of return expressions outside of function bodies
This pull request fixes#86188. The problem is that the current code for type-checking `return` expressions stops if the `return` occurs outside of a function body, while the correct behavior is to continue type-checking the return value expression (otherwise an ICE happens later on because variables declared in the return value expression don't have a type).
Also, I have noticed that it is sometimes not obvious why a `return` is outside of a function body; for instance, in the example from #86188 (which currently causes an ICE):
```rust
fn main() {
[(); return || {
let tx;
}]
}
```
I have changed the error message to also explain why the `return` is considered outside of the function body:
```
error[E0572]: return statement outside of function body
--> ice0.rs:2:10
|
1 | / fn main() {
2 | | [(); return || {
| |__________^
3 | || let tx;
4 | || }]
| ||_____^ the return is part of this body...
5 | | }
| |_- ...not the enclosing function body
```
Fix typo in libs tracking issue template
Currently, the libs tracking issue template expands FCP as "final commenting period". Everywhere else, including in [the official explanation](https://rust-lang.github.io/rfcs/), it's expanded as "final comment period". That version also sounds a bit better. Accordingly, this PR changes the tracking issue template to use that version.
`@rustbot` label A-meta T-libs-api
r? `@m-ou-se`
Reserve prefixed identifiers and literals (RFC 3101)
This PR denies any identifiers immediately followed by one of three tokens `"`, `'` or `#`, which is stricter than the requirements of RFC 3101 but may be necessary according to the discussion at [Zulip].
[Zulip]: https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/268952-edition-2021/topic/reserved.20prefixes/near/238470099
The tracking issue #84599 says we'll add a feature gate named `reserved_prefixes`, but I don't think I can do this because it is impossible for the lexer to know whether a feature is enabled or not. I guess determining the behavior by the edition information should be enough.
Fixes#84599
2229: Capture box completely in move closures
Even if the content from box is used in a sharef-ref context,
we capture the box entirerly.
This is motivated by:
1) We only capture data that is on the stack.
2) Capturing data from within the box might end up moving more data than
the user anticipated.
Closes https://github.com/rust-lang/project-rfc-2229/issues/50
r? `@nikomatsakis`
Revert revert of constness in #86003
Re-constify `mem::swap`, `mem::replace`, `ptr::write` which were marked as not `const` in #86003
Once the checks pass, this should solve #86236
Add debug info tests for range, fix-sized array, and cell types
This PR add several debug info tests to guarantee that the displays of fixed sized arrays, range types, cell types, threads, locks, and mutexes in CDB are correct.
It also updates CDB tests for slices in pretty-std.rs after string visualization in WinDbg is fixed by this PR: #81898.
