submodules: update clippy from fbb3a47b to cafbe7f2
Changes:
````
Update compiletest_rs
Typo
Fix dogfood error
Add lint PathBufPushOverwrite
Update *.stderr file
Remove code duplication
Format code
Add test for debug_assert!(false)
Don't lint debug_assert!(false)
Add run-rustfix for option_map_or_none lint
Move two cast_lossless tests to their correct files
Change naive_bytecount applicability MaybeIncorrect
Add tests for declare_lint_pass and impl_lint_pass
Use lint pass macros
Document `declare_lint_pass!`
Fix lint_without_lint_pass internal lint
Use {get,match}_def_path from LateContext
Remove uplifted functions {get,match}_def_path from Clippy
Add run-rustfix for len_zero lint
Add run-rustfix for bool_comparison lint
Add run-rustfix for deref_addrof lint
while_let_loop uses placeholders in suggestions
Remove rust-toolchain file from clippy_dev
Update adding_lints.md
Update PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE
Add new lint checklist
Create PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE
Only suggest .copied() for Option right now
Also suggest .copied() when .clone() is called on a Copy type
Suggest .copied() instead of .cloned() in map_clone when dealing with references
Deny rustc internal lints
Remove clippy::default_hash_types internal lint
Enable -Zunstable-options in .cargo/config
````
r? @oli-obk
Changes:
````
Update compiletest_rs
Typo
Fix dogfood error
Add lint PathBufPushOverwrite
Update *.stderr file
Remove code duplication
Format code
Add test for debug_assert!(false)
Don't lint debug_assert!(false)
Add run-rustfix for option_map_or_none lint
Move two cast_lossless tests to their correct files
Change naive_bytecount applicability MaybeIncorrect
Add tests for declare_lint_pass and impl_lint_pass
Use lint pass macros
Document `declare_lint_pass!`
Fix lint_without_lint_pass internal lint
Use {get,match}_def_path from LateContext
Remove uplifted functions {get,match}_def_path from Clippy
Add run-rustfix for len_zero lint
Add run-rustfix for bool_comparison lint
Add run-rustfix for deref_addrof lint
while_let_loop uses placeholders in suggestions
Remove rust-toolchain file from clippy_dev
Update adding_lints.md
Update PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE
Add new lint checklist
Create PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE
Only suggest .copied() for Option right now
Also suggest .copied() when .clone() is called on a Copy type
Suggest .copied() instead of .cloned() in map_clone when dealing with references
Deny rustc internal lints
Remove clippy::default_hash_types internal lint
Enable -Zunstable-options in .cargo/config
````
fix LinkedList invalidating mutable references
The test `test_insert_prev` failed in Miri due to what I consider a bug in `LinkedList`: in various places, `NonNull::as_mut` got called to modify the `prev`/`next` pointers of existing nodes. In particular, the unstable `insert_next` has to modify the `next` pointer of the node that was last handed out by the iterator; to this end it creates a mutable reference to the *entire node* that overlaps with the mutable reference to the node's content that was handed out by the iterator! Thus, the next use if said mutable reference is UB.
In code:
```rust
loop {
match it.next() { // mutable reference handed to us
None => break,
Some(elt) => {
it.insert_next(*elt + 1); // this invalidates `elt` because it creates an overlapping mutable reference
match it.peek_next() {
Some(x) => assert_eq!(*x, *elt + 2), // this use of `elt` now is a use of an invalid pointer
None => assert_eq!(8, *elt),
}
}
}
}
```
This PR fixes that by using `as_ptr` instead of `as_mut`. This avoids invalidating the mutable reference that was handed to the user. I did this in all methods called by iterators, just to be sure.
Cc @Gankro
make liballoc internal test suite mostly pass in Miri
I discovered, to my surprise, that liballoc has two test suites: `liballoc/tests`, and a bunch of stuff embedded directly within liballoc. The latter was not covered by [miri-test-libstd](https://github.com/RalfJung/miri-test-libstd) yet. This disables in Miri the tests that Miri cannot support or runs too slowly.
Rollup of 16 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #59915 (Implement event filtering for self-profiler.)
- #59933 (Make clear that format padding doesn't work for Debug)
- #60023 (implement specialized nth_back() for Bytes, Fuse and Enumerate)
- #60032 (Remove unwanted z-index change)
- #60041 (Simplify the returning of a Result a bit)
- #60045 (Suggest appropriate path when calling associated item on bare types)
- #60052 (Correct unused parameter diagnostic)
- #60056 (Update rustfmt to 1.2.1)
- #60060 (whitelist RTM x86 target cpu feature)
- #60061 (Change suggestion of field when not in self context)
- #60064 (Point at try `?` on errors affecting the err match arm of the desugared code)
- #60078 (Use more realistic example for thread builder)
- #60080 (Fix small errors in docs for `rchunks_exact` and `rchunks_exact_mut`.)
- #60082 (Update miri)
- #60097 (Use -mergefunc-use-aliases for any LLVM >= 8)
- #60098 (libcore: deny `elided_lifetimes_in_paths`)
Failed merges:
r? @ghost
Fix small errors in docs for `rchunks_exact` and `rchunks_exact_mut`.
The documentation for `rchunks_exact` said it started at the beginning
of the slice, bit it actually starts at the end of the slice.
In addition, there were a couple of "of the slice of the slice"
duplicate phrases going on for `rchunks_exact` and `rchunks_exact_mut`.
This fixes#60068.
Suggest appropriate path when calling associated item on bare types
When looking at the documentation for `std::f32` or `std::str`, for
example, it is easy to get confused and assume `std::f32` and `f32`
are the same thing. Because of this, it is not uncommon to attempt
writing `f32::consts::PI` instead of the correct
`std::f32::consts::PI`. When encountering the former, which results
in an access error due to it being an inexistent path, try to access
the same path under `std`. If this succeeds, this information is
stored for later tweaking of the final E0599 to provide an
appropriate suggestion.
Fix#26760, fix#46660.
implement specialized nth_back() for Bytes, Fuse and Enumerate
Hi,
After my first PR has been successfully merged, here is my second pull request :-)
Also this PR contains some specializations for the problem discussed in #54054.
Implement event filtering for self-profiler.
This is a first sketch for event filtering in the self-profiler, something that we'll want in order to keep profiling overhead low in the common case. The PR contains the commits from https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/59515 and, for the moment, is meant for performance testing.
r? @wesleywiser
When looking at the documentation for `std::f32` or `std::str`, for
example, it is easy to get confused and assume `std::f32` and `f32`
are the same thing. Because of this, it is not uncommon to attempt
writing `f32::consts::PI` instead of the correct
`std::f32::consts::PI`. When encountering the former, which results
in an access error due to it being an inexistent path, try to access
the same path under `std`. If this succeeds, this information is
stored for later tweaking of the final E0599 to provide an
appropriate suggestion.
This suggestion applies to both E0233 and E0599 and is only checked
when the first ident of a path corresponds to a primitive type.
Rename files about error codes
fixes#60017
This PR will be failed in tidy.
<details>
<summary>The log is here:</summary>
```
tidy check
tidy error: duplicate error code: 411
tidy error: Documents\GitHub\rust\src\librustc_resolve\diagnostics.rs:83: __diagnostic_used!(E0411);
tidy error: Documents\GitHub\rust\src\librustc_resolve\diagnostics.rs:84: err.code(DiagnosticId::Error("E0411".to_owned()));
tidy error: duplicate error code: 424
tidy error: Documents\GitHub\rust\src\librustc_resolve\diagnostics.rs:90: debug!("smart_resolve_path_fragment: E0424, source={:?}", source);
tidy error: Documents\GitHub\rust\src\librustc_resolve\diagnostics.rs:92: __diagnostic_used!(E0424);
tidy error: Documents\GitHub\rust\src\librustc_resolve\diagnostics.rs:93: err.code(DiagnosticId::Error("E0424".to_owned()));
some tidy checks failed
```
</details>
I'd like to fix this but I don't know what to do.
I will work on later. Please let me know if you have any solutions.
r? @petrochenkov
The documentation for `rchunks_exact` said it started at the beginning
of the slice, bit it actually starts at the end of the slice.
In addition, there were a couple of "of the slice of the slice"
duplicate phrases going on for `rchunks_exact` and `rchunks_exact_mut`.
This fixes#60068.
