3671: Add identity expansion checking in ill-form expansion r=flodiebold a=edwin0cheng
This PR try to add more checking code in error case in macro expansion. The bug in #3642 is introduced by #3580 , which allow ill-form macro expansion in *all* kind of macro expansions.
In general we should separate hypothetical macro expansion and the actual macro expansion call. However, currently the `Semantic` workflow we are using only support single macro expansion type, we might want to review it and make it works in both ways. (Maybe add a field in `MacroCallLoc` for differentiation)
Fix#3642
Co-authored-by: Edwin Cheng <edwin0cheng@gmail.com>
3623: 'Fill match arms' should work with existing match arms r=matklad a=slyngbaek
Addresses #3039
This essentially adds missing match arms. The algorithm for this
can get complicated rather quickly so bail in certain conditions
and rely on a PlaceholderPat.
The algorighm works as such:
- Iterate through the Enum Def Variants
- Attempt to see if the variant already exists as a match arm
- If yes, skip the enum variant. If no, include it.
- If it becomes complicated, rather than exhaustively deal with every
branch, mark it as a "partial match" and simply include the
placeholder.
Conditions for "complication":
- The match arm contains a match guard
- Any kind of nested destrucuring
Order the resulting merged match branches as such:
1. Provided match arms
2. Missing enum variant branch arms
3. End with Placeholder if required
- Add extra tests
Co-authored-by: Steffen Lyngbaek <steffenlyngbaek@gmail.com>
Iterate through TupleStructPat's until a MatchArm if
one exists. Store in a new is_pat_bind_and_path bool
and allow the `complete_scope` to find matches.
Added some tests to ensure it works in simple and nested cases.
Addresses #3039
This essentially adds missing match arms. The algorithm for this
can get complicated rather quickly so bail in certain conditions
and rely on a PlaceholderPat.
The algorighm works as such:
- Iterate through the Enum Def Variants
- Attempt to see if the variant already exists as a match arm
- If yes, skip the enum variant. If no, include it.
- If it becomes complicated, rather than exhaustively deal with every
branch, mark it as a "partial match" and simply include the
placeholder.
Conditions for "complication":
- The match arm contains a match guard
- Any kind of nested destrucuring
Order the resulting merged match branches as such:
1. Provided match arms
2. Missing enum variant branch arms
3. End with Placeholder if required
- Add extra tests
