squiid/rust
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Activity

Coalesce branches

Browse source 
Move a bunch of branches together into one if block, for easier reading.

Resolve comments

Attempt to make some branches unreachable [tmp]

Revert unreachable branches
This commit is contained in:
kadmin 2022-05-19 18:53:01 +00:00
parent edae6edd32
commit ee8efc5c4a
2 changed files with 135 additions and 139 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

1
compiler/rustc_trait_selection/src/lib.rs
View file

@ -21,6 +21,7 @@
#![feature(label_break_value)]
#![feature(let_chains)]
#![feature(let_else)]
#![feature(if_let_guard)]
#![feature(never_type)]
#![recursion_limit = "512"] // For rustdoc

273
compiler/rustc_trait_selection/src/traits/const_evaluatable.rs
View file

@ -39,153 +39,148 @@ pub fn is_const_evaluatable<'cx, 'tcx>(
let tcx = infcx.tcx;
if tcx.features().generic_const_exprs {
match AbstractConst::new(tcx, uv)? {
// We are looking at a generic abstract constant.
Some(ct) => {
if satisfied_from_param_env(tcx, ct, param_env)? {
return Ok(());
}
// We were unable to unify the abstract constant with
// a constant found in the caller bounds, there are
// now three possible cases here.
#[derive(Debug, Copy, Clone, PartialEq, Eq, PartialOrd, Ord)]
enum FailureKind {
/// The abstract const still references an inference
/// variable, in this case we return `TooGeneric`.
MentionsInfer,
/// The abstract const references a generic parameter,
/// this means that we emit an error here.
MentionsParam,
/// The substs are concrete enough that we can simply
/// try and evaluate the given constant.
Concrete,
}
let mut failure_kind = FailureKind::Concrete;
walk_abstract_const::<!, _>(tcx, ct, |node| match node.root(tcx) {
Node::Leaf(leaf) => {
if leaf.has_infer_types_or_consts() {
failure_kind = FailureKind::MentionsInfer;
} else if leaf.has_param_types_or_consts() {
failure_kind = cmp::min(failure_kind, FailureKind::MentionsParam);
}
ControlFlow::CONTINUE
}
Node::Cast(_, _, ty) => {
if ty.has_infer_types_or_consts() {
failure_kind = FailureKind::MentionsInfer;
} else if ty.has_param_types_or_consts() {
failure_kind = cmp::min(failure_kind, FailureKind::MentionsParam);
}
ControlFlow::CONTINUE
}
Node::Binop(_, _, _) | Node::UnaryOp(_, _) | Node::FunctionCall(_, _) => {
ControlFlow::CONTINUE
}
});
match failure_kind {
FailureKind::MentionsInfer => {
return Err(NotConstEvaluatable::MentionsInfer);
}
FailureKind::MentionsParam => {
return Err(NotConstEvaluatable::MentionsParam);
}
FailureKind::Concrete => {
// Dealt with below by the same code which handles this
// without the feature gate.
}
}
if let Some(ct) = AbstractConst::new(tcx, uv)? {
if satisfied_from_param_env(tcx, ct, param_env)? {
return Ok(());
}
None => {
// If we are dealing with a concrete constant, we can
// reuse the old code path and try to evaluate
// the constant.
// We were unable to unify the abstract constant with
// a constant found in the caller bounds, there are
// now three possible cases here.
#[derive(Debug, Copy, Clone, PartialEq, Eq, PartialOrd, Ord)]
enum FailureKind {
/// The abstract const still references an inference
/// variable, in this case we return `TooGeneric`.
MentionsInfer,
/// The abstract const references a generic parameter,
/// this means that we emit an error here.
MentionsParam,
/// The substs are concrete enough that we can simply
/// try and evaluate the given constant.
Concrete,
}
let mut failure_kind = FailureKind::Concrete;
walk_abstract_const::<!, _>(tcx, ct, |node| match node.root(tcx) {
Node::Leaf(leaf) => {
if leaf.has_infer_types_or_consts() {
failure_kind = FailureKind::MentionsInfer;
} else if leaf.has_param_types_or_consts() {
failure_kind = cmp::min(failure_kind, FailureKind::MentionsParam);
}
ControlFlow::CONTINUE
}
Node::Cast(_, _, ty) => {
if ty.has_infer_types_or_consts() {
failure_kind = FailureKind::MentionsInfer;
} else if ty.has_param_types_or_consts() {
failure_kind = cmp::min(failure_kind, FailureKind::MentionsParam);
}
ControlFlow::CONTINUE
}
Node::Binop(_, _, _) | Node::UnaryOp(_, _) | Node::FunctionCall(_, _) => {
ControlFlow::CONTINUE
}
});
match failure_kind {
FailureKind::MentionsInfer => {
return Err(NotConstEvaluatable::MentionsInfer);
}
FailureKind::MentionsParam => {
return Err(NotConstEvaluatable::MentionsParam);
}
// returned below
FailureKind::Concrete => {}
}
}
}
let future_compat_lint = || {
if tcx.features().generic_const_exprs {
return;
}
if let Some(local_def_id) = uv.def.did.as_local() {
infcx.tcx.struct_span_lint_hir(
lint::builtin::CONST_EVALUATABLE_UNCHECKED,
infcx.tcx.hir().local_def_id_to_hir_id(local_def_id),
span,
|err| {
err.build("cannot use constants which depend on generic parameters in types")
.emit();
},
);
}
};
// FIXME: We should only try to evaluate a given constant here if it is fully concrete
// as we don't want to allow things like `[u8; std::mem::size_of::<*mut T>()]`.
//
// We previously did not check this, so we only emit a future compat warning if
// const evaluation succeeds and the given constant is still polymorphic for now
// and hopefully soon change this to an error.
//
// See #74595 for more details about this.
let concrete = infcx.const_eval_resolve(param_env, uv.expand(), Some(span));
if concrete.is_ok() && uv.substs.has_param_types_or_consts() {
match infcx.tcx.def_kind(uv.def.did) {
DefKind::AnonConst | DefKind::InlineConst => {
let mir_body = infcx.tcx.mir_for_ctfe_opt_const_arg(uv.def);
if mir_body.is_polymorphic {
future_compat_lint();
}
let concrete = infcx.const_eval_resolve(param_env, uv.expand(), Some(span));
match concrete {
Err(ErrorHandled::TooGeneric) => Err(if !uv.has_infer_types_or_consts() {
infcx
.tcx
.sess
.delay_span_bug(span, &format!("unexpected `TooGeneric` for {:?}", uv));
NotConstEvaluatable::MentionsParam
} else {
NotConstEvaluatable::MentionsInfer
}),
Err(ErrorHandled::Linted) => {
let reported = infcx
.tcx
.sess
.delay_span_bug(span, "constant in type had error reported as lint");
Err(NotConstEvaluatable::Error(reported))
}
_ => future_compat_lint(),
Err(ErrorHandled::Reported(e)) => Err(NotConstEvaluatable::Error(e)),
Ok(_) => Ok(()),
}
}
} else {
// FIXME: We should only try to evaluate a given constant here if it is fully concrete
// as we don't want to allow things like `[u8; std::mem::size_of::<*mut T>()]`.
//
// We previously did not check this, so we only emit a future compat warning if
// const evaluation succeeds and the given constant is still polymorphic for now
// and hopefully soon change this to an error.
//
// See #74595 for more details about this.
let concrete = infcx.const_eval_resolve(param_env, uv.expand(), Some(span));
// If we're evaluating a foreign constant, under a nightly compiler without generic
// const exprs, AND it would've passed if that expression had been evaluated with
// generic const exprs, then suggest using generic const exprs.
if concrete.is_err()
&& tcx.sess.is_nightly_build()
&& !uv.def.did.is_local()
&& !tcx.features().generic_const_exprs
&& let Ok(Some(ct)) = AbstractConst::new(tcx, uv)
&& satisfied_from_param_env(tcx, ct, param_env) == Ok(true)
{
tcx.sess
.struct_span_fatal(
// Slightly better span than just using `span` alone
if span == rustc_span::DUMMY_SP { tcx.def_span(uv.def.did) } else { span },
"failed to evaluate generic const expression",
)
.note("the crate this constant originates from uses `#![feature(generic_const_exprs)]`")
.span_suggestion_verbose(
rustc_span::DUMMY_SP,
"consider enabling this feature",
"#![feature(generic_const_exprs)]\n".to_string(),
rustc_errors::Applicability::MaybeIncorrect,
)
.emit()
}
match concrete {
// If we're evaluating a foreign constant, under a nightly compiler without generic
// const exprs, AND it would've passed if that expression had been evaluated with
// generic const exprs, then suggest using generic const exprs.
Err(_) if tcx.sess.is_nightly_build()
&& let Ok(Some(ct)) = AbstractConst::new(tcx, uv)
&& satisfied_from_param_env(tcx, ct, param_env) == Ok(true) => {
tcx.sess
.struct_span_fatal(
// Slightly better span than just using `span` alone
if span == rustc_span::DUMMY_SP { tcx.def_span(uv.def.did) } else { span },
"failed to evaluate generic const expression",
)
.note("the crate this constant originates from uses `#![feature(generic_const_exprs)]`")
.span_suggestion_verbose(
rustc_span::DUMMY_SP,
"consider enabling this feature",
"#![feature(generic_const_exprs)]\n".to_string(),
rustc_errors::Applicability::MaybeIncorrect,
)
.emit()
}
debug!(?concrete, "is_const_evaluatable");
match concrete {
Err(ErrorHandled::TooGeneric) => Err(match uv.has_infer_types_or_consts() {
true => NotConstEvaluatable::MentionsInfer,
false => NotConstEvaluatable::MentionsParam,
}),
Err(ErrorHandled::Linted) => {
let reported =
infcx.tcx.sess.delay_span_bug(span, "constant in type had error reported as lint");
Err(NotConstEvaluatable::Error(reported))
Err(ErrorHandled::TooGeneric) => Err(if uv.has_infer_types_or_consts() {
NotConstEvaluatable::MentionsInfer
} else {
NotConstEvaluatable::MentionsParam
}),
Err(ErrorHandled::Linted) => {
let reported =
infcx.tcx.sess.delay_span_bug(span, "constant in type had error reported as lint");
Err(NotConstEvaluatable::Error(reported))
}
Err(ErrorHandled::Reported(e)) => Err(NotConstEvaluatable::Error(e)),
Ok(_) => {
if uv.substs.has_param_types_or_consts() {
assert!(matches!(infcx.tcx.def_kind(uv.def.did), DefKind::AnonConst));
let mir_body = infcx.tcx.mir_for_ctfe_opt_const_arg(uv.def);
if mir_body.is_polymorphic {
let Some(local_def_id) = uv.def.did.as_local() else { return Ok(()) };
tcx.struct_span_lint_hir(
lint::builtin::CONST_EVALUATABLE_UNCHECKED,
tcx.hir().local_def_id_to_hir_id(local_def_id),
span,
|err| {
err.build("cannot use constants which depend on generic parameters in types").emit();
})
}
}
Ok(())
},
}
Err(ErrorHandled::Reported(e)) => Err(NotConstEvaluatable::Error(e)),
Ok(_) => Ok(()),
}
}