Rollup merge of #47679 - etaoins:remove-redundant-backtrace-hint, r=estebank
Remove broken redundant backtrace hint When the compiler driver panics it attempts to show a hint about using `RUST_BACKTRACE`. However, the logic is currently reversed to the hint is only shown if `RUST_BACKTRACE` is **already** set: ```shell > RUST_BACKTRACE=1 rustc /dev/null --crate-type proc-macro error: internal compiler error: unexpected panic ... note: run with `RUST_BACKTRACE=1` for a backtrace thread 'rustc' panicked at 'attempt to subtract with overflow', librustc_errors/emitter.rs:287:49 note: Some details are omitted, run with `RUST_BACKTRACE=full` for a verbose backtrace. > RUST_BACKTRACE=0 rustc /dev/null --crate-type proc-macro error: internal compiler error: unexpected panic ... thread 'rustc' panicked at 'attempt to subtract with overflow', librustc_errors/emitter.rs:287:49 note: Run with `RUST_BACKTRACE=1` for a backtrace. ``` As the `panic` itself already has a working `RUST_BACKTRACE` hint just remove the broken duplicate hint entirely.
This commit is contained in:
commit
bbdc5b9637
1 changed files with 0 additions and 8 deletions
|
@ -1273,14 +1273,6 @@ pub fn monitor<F: FnOnce() + Send + 'static>(f: F) {
|
|||
¬e,
|
||||
errors::Level::Note);
|
||||
}
|
||||
if match env::var_os("RUST_BACKTRACE") {
|
||||
Some(val) => &val != "0",
|
||||
None => false,
|
||||
} {
|
||||
handler.emit(&MultiSpan::new(),
|
||||
"run with `RUST_BACKTRACE=1` for a backtrace",
|
||||
errors::Level::Note);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
eprintln!("{}", str::from_utf8(&data.lock().unwrap()).unwrap());
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue