Rollup merge of #47679 - etaoins:remove-redundant-backtrace-hint, r=estebank

Remove broken redundant backtrace hint

When the compiler driver panics it attempts to show a hint about using `RUST_BACKTRACE`. However, the logic is currently reversed to the hint is only shown if `RUST_BACKTRACE` is **already**   set:

```shell
> RUST_BACKTRACE=1 rustc /dev/null --crate-type proc-macro
error: internal compiler error: unexpected panic
...
note: run with `RUST_BACKTRACE=1` for a backtrace

thread 'rustc' panicked at 'attempt to subtract with overflow', librustc_errors/emitter.rs:287:49
note: Some details are omitted, run with `RUST_BACKTRACE=full` for a verbose backtrace.

> RUST_BACKTRACE=0 rustc /dev/null --crate-type proc-macro
error: internal compiler error: unexpected panic
...
thread 'rustc' panicked at 'attempt to subtract with overflow', librustc_errors/emitter.rs:287:49
note: Run with `RUST_BACKTRACE=1` for a backtrace.
```

As the `panic` itself already has a working `RUST_BACKTRACE` hint just remove the broken duplicate hint entirely.
This commit is contained in:
Guillaume Gomez 2018-01-25 15:52:13 +01:00 committed by GitHub
commit bbdc5b9637

View file

@ -1273,14 +1273,6 @@ pub fn monitor<F: FnOnce() + Send + 'static>(f: F) {
&note,
errors::Level::Note);
}
if match env::var_os("RUST_BACKTRACE") {
Some(val) => &val != "0",
None => false,
} {
handler.emit(&MultiSpan::new(),
"run with `RUST_BACKTRACE=1` for a backtrace",
errors::Level::Note);
}
eprintln!("{}", str::from_utf8(&data.lock().unwrap()).unwrap());
}