Move logic to its own method
This commit is contained in:
parent
e33f7f7de1
commit
ab2479b00d
1 changed files with 63 additions and 73 deletions
|
@ -1208,83 +1208,20 @@ impl<'gcx, 'tcx, 'exprs, E> CoerceMany<'gcx, 'tcx, 'exprs, E>
|
|||
db.span_label(cause.span, "return type is not `()`");
|
||||
}
|
||||
ObligationCauseCode::BlockTailExpression(blk_id) => {
|
||||
db = fcx.report_mismatched_types(cause, expected, found, err);
|
||||
|
||||
let expr = expression.unwrap_or_else(|| {
|
||||
span_bug!(cause.span,
|
||||
"supposed to be part of a block tail expression, but the \
|
||||
expression is empty");
|
||||
});
|
||||
let pointing_at_return_type = fcx.suggest_mismatched_types_on_tail(
|
||||
&mut db,
|
||||
expr,
|
||||
let parent_id = fcx.tcx.hir().get_parent_node(blk_id);
|
||||
db = self.report_return_mismatched_types(
|
||||
cause,
|
||||
expected,
|
||||
found,
|
||||
cause.span,
|
||||
blk_id,
|
||||
err,
|
||||
fcx,
|
||||
parent_id,
|
||||
expression.map(|expr| (expr, blk_id)),
|
||||
);
|
||||
// FIXME: replace with navigating up the chain until hitting an fn or
|
||||
// bailing if no "pass-through" Node is found, in order to provide a
|
||||
// suggestion when encountering something like:
|
||||
// ```
|
||||
// fn foo(a: bool) -> impl Debug {
|
||||
// if a {
|
||||
// bar()?;
|
||||
// }
|
||||
// {
|
||||
// let x = unsafe { bar() };
|
||||
// x
|
||||
// }
|
||||
// }
|
||||
// ```
|
||||
//
|
||||
// Verify that this is a tail expression of a function, otherwise the
|
||||
// label pointing out the cause for the type coercion will be wrong
|
||||
// as prior return coercions would not be relevant (#57664).
|
||||
let parent_id = fcx.tcx.hir().get_parent_node(blk_id);
|
||||
let parent = fcx.tcx.hir().get(fcx.tcx.hir().get_parent_node(parent_id));
|
||||
if let (Some((fn_decl, _, _)), false) = (
|
||||
fcx.get_node_fn_decl(parent),
|
||||
pointing_at_return_type,
|
||||
) {
|
||||
if let Some(sp) = fcx.ret_coercion_span.borrow().as_ref() {
|
||||
db.span_label(
|
||||
fn_decl.output.span(),
|
||||
"expected because this return type...",
|
||||
);
|
||||
db.span_label(*sp, format!(
|
||||
"...is found to be `{}` here",
|
||||
fcx.resolve_type_vars_with_obligations(expected),
|
||||
));
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
ObligationCauseCode::ReturnType(_id) => {
|
||||
db = fcx.report_mismatched_types(cause, expected, found, err);
|
||||
let _id = fcx.tcx.hir().get_parent_node(_id);
|
||||
let mut pointing_at_return_type = false;
|
||||
let mut return_sp = None;
|
||||
if let Some((fn_decl, can_suggest)) = fcx.get_fn_decl(_id) {
|
||||
pointing_at_return_type = fcx.suggest_missing_return_type(
|
||||
&mut db, &fn_decl, expected, found, can_suggest);
|
||||
if !pointing_at_return_type {
|
||||
return_sp = Some(fn_decl.output.span()); // `impl Trait` return type
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
if let (Some(sp), false) = (
|
||||
fcx.ret_coercion_span.borrow().as_ref(),
|
||||
pointing_at_return_type,
|
||||
) {
|
||||
if let Some(return_sp) = return_sp {
|
||||
db.span_label(return_sp, "expected because this return type...");
|
||||
db.span_label( *sp, format!(
|
||||
"...is found to be `{}` here",
|
||||
fcx.resolve_type_vars_with_obligations(expected),
|
||||
));
|
||||
} else if !sp.overlaps(cause.span) {
|
||||
db.span_label(*sp, "expected because of this statement");
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
ObligationCauseCode::ReturnType(id) => {
|
||||
db = self.report_return_mismatched_types(
|
||||
cause, expected, found, err, fcx, id, None);
|
||||
}
|
||||
_ => {
|
||||
db = fcx.report_mismatched_types(cause, expected, found, err);
|
||||
|
@ -1302,6 +1239,59 @@ impl<'gcx, 'tcx, 'exprs, E> CoerceMany<'gcx, 'tcx, 'exprs, E>
|
|||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
fn report_return_mismatched_types<'a>(
|
||||
&self,
|
||||
cause: &ObligationCause<'tcx>,
|
||||
expected: Ty<'tcx>,
|
||||
found: Ty<'tcx>,
|
||||
err: TypeError<'tcx>,
|
||||
fcx: &FnCtxt<'a, 'gcx, 'tcx>,
|
||||
id: syntax::ast::NodeId,
|
||||
expression: Option<(&'gcx hir::Expr, syntax::ast::NodeId)>,
|
||||
) -> DiagnosticBuilder<'a> {
|
||||
let mut db = fcx.report_mismatched_types(cause, expected, found, err);
|
||||
|
||||
let mut pointing_at_return_type = false;
|
||||
let mut return_sp = None;
|
||||
|
||||
// Verify that this is a tail expression of a function, otherwise the
|
||||
// label pointing out the cause for the type coercion will be wrong
|
||||
// as prior return coercions would not be relevant (#57664).
|
||||
let parent_id = fcx.tcx.hir().get_parent_node(id);
|
||||
let fn_decl = if let Some((expr, blk_id)) = expression {
|
||||
pointing_at_return_type = fcx.suggest_mismatched_types_on_tail(
|
||||
&mut db,
|
||||
expr,
|
||||
expected,
|
||||
found,
|
||||
cause.span,
|
||||
blk_id,
|
||||
);
|
||||
let parent = fcx.tcx.hir().get(parent_id);
|
||||
fcx.get_node_fn_decl(parent).map(|(fn_decl, _, is_main)| (fn_decl, is_main))
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
fcx.get_fn_decl(parent_id)
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
if let (Some((fn_decl, can_suggest)), _) = (fn_decl, pointing_at_return_type) {
|
||||
if expression.is_none() {
|
||||
pointing_at_return_type |= fcx.suggest_missing_return_type(
|
||||
&mut db, &fn_decl, expected, found, can_suggest);
|
||||
}
|
||||
if !pointing_at_return_type {
|
||||
return_sp = Some(fn_decl.output.span()); // `impl Trait` return type
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
if let (Some(sp), Some(return_sp)) = (fcx.ret_coercion_span.borrow().as_ref(), return_sp) {
|
||||
db.span_label(return_sp, "expected because this return type...");
|
||||
db.span_label( *sp, format!(
|
||||
"...is found to be `{}` here",
|
||||
fcx.resolve_type_vars_with_obligations(expected),
|
||||
));
|
||||
}
|
||||
db
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
pub fn complete<'a>(self, fcx: &FnCtxt<'a, 'gcx, 'tcx>) -> Ty<'tcx> {
|
||||
if let Some(final_ty) = self.final_ty {
|
||||
final_ty
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue