squiid/rust
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Activity

Rollup merge of #104674 - spastorino:negative-impl-tcx, r=lcnr

Browse source 
Make negative_impl and negative_impl_exists take the right types

r? `@lcnr`
This commit is contained in:
Matthias Krüger 2022-11-22 00:01:12 +01:00 committed by GitHub
parent 96d0b7f159 16c9e39021
commit 816a31fc66
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG key ID: 4AEE18F83AFDEB23
1 changed files with 10 additions and 16 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

26
compiler/rustc_trait_selection/src/traits/coherence.rs
View file

@ -162,8 +162,8 @@ fn overlap_within_probe<'cx, 'tcx>(
let infcx = selcx.infcx();
if overlap_mode.use_negative_impl() {
if negative_impl(selcx, impl1_def_id, impl2_def_id)
|| negative_impl(selcx, impl2_def_id, impl1_def_id)
if negative_impl(infcx.tcx, impl1_def_id, impl2_def_id)
|| negative_impl(infcx.tcx, impl2_def_id, impl1_def_id)
{
return None;
}
@ -279,13 +279,8 @@ fn implicit_negative<'cx, 'tcx>(
/// Given impl1 and impl2 check if both impls are never satisfied by a common type (including
/// where-clauses) If so, return true, they are disjoint and false otherwise.
fn negative_impl<'cx, 'tcx>(
selcx: &mut SelectionContext<'cx, 'tcx>,
impl1_def_id: DefId,
impl2_def_id: DefId,
) -> bool {
fn negative_impl<'tcx>(tcx: TyCtxt<'tcx>, impl1_def_id: DefId, impl2_def_id: DefId) -> bool {
debug!("negative_impl(impl1_def_id={:?}, impl2_def_id={:?})", impl1_def_id, impl2_def_id);
let tcx = selcx.infcx().tcx;
// Create an infcx, taking the predicates of impl1 as assumptions:
let infcx = tcx.infer_ctxt().build();
@ -332,11 +327,10 @@ fn equate<'tcx>(
return true;
};
let selcx = &mut SelectionContext::new(&infcx);
let opt_failing_obligation = obligations
.into_iter()
.chain(more_obligations)
.find(|o| negative_impl_exists(selcx, o, body_def_id));
.find(|o| negative_impl_exists(infcx, o, body_def_id));
if let Some(failing_obligation) = opt_failing_obligation {
debug!("overlap: obligation unsatisfiable {:?}", failing_obligation);
@ -347,19 +341,19 @@ fn equate<'tcx>(
}
/// Try to prove that a negative impl exist for the given obligation and its super predicates.
#[instrument(level = "debug", skip(selcx))]
fn negative_impl_exists<'cx, 'tcx>(
selcx: &SelectionContext<'cx, 'tcx>,
#[instrument(level = "debug", skip(infcx))]
fn negative_impl_exists<'tcx>(
infcx: &InferCtxt<'tcx>,
o: &PredicateObligation<'tcx>,
body_def_id: DefId,
) -> bool {
if resolve_negative_obligation(selcx.infcx().fork(), o, body_def_id) {
if resolve_negative_obligation(infcx.fork(), o, body_def_id) {
return true;
}
// Try to prove a negative obligation exists for super predicates
for o in util::elaborate_predicates(selcx.tcx(), iter::once(o.predicate)) {
if resolve_negative_obligation(selcx.infcx().fork(), &o, body_def_id) {
for o in util::elaborate_predicates(infcx.tcx, iter::once(o.predicate)) {
if resolve_negative_obligation(infcx.fork(), &o, body_def_id) {
return true;
}
}