Rollup merge of #79918 - woodruffw-forks:ww/doc-initializer-side-effects, r=dtolnay

doc(array,vec): add notes about side effects when empty-initializing

Copying some context from a conversation in the Rust discord:

* Both `vec![T; 0]` and `[T; 0]` are syntactically valid, and produce empty containers of their respective types

* Both *also* have side effects:

```rust
fn side_effect() -> String {
    println!("side effect!");

    "foo".into()
}

fn main() {
    println!("before!");

    let x = vec![side_effect(); 0];

    let y = [side_effect(); 0];

    println!("{:?}, {:?}", x, y);
}
```

produces:

```
before!
side effect!
side effect!
[], []
```

This PR just adds two small notes to each's documentation, warning users that side effects can occur.

I've also submitted a clippy proposal: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/6439

library/alloc/src/macros.rs

@@ -29,6 +29,10 @@
 /// to the same boxed integer value, not five references pointing to independently
 /// boxed integers.
 ///
+/// Also, note that `vec![expr; 0]` is allowed, and produces an empty vector.
+/// This will still evaluate `expr`, however, and immediately drop the resulting value, so
+/// be mindful of side effects.
+///
 /// [`Vec`]: crate::vec::Vec
 #[cfg(not(test))]
 #[macro_export]

library/std/src/primitive_docs.rs

@@ -489,6 +489,10 @@ mod prim_pointer {}
 /// * A repeat expression `[x; N]`, which produces an array with `N` copies of `x`.
 ///   The type of `x` must be [`Copy`].
 ///
+/// Note that `[expr; 0]` is allowed, and produces an empty array.
+/// This will still evaluate `expr`, however, and immediately drop the resulting value, so
+/// be mindful of side effects.
+///
 /// Arrays of *any* size implement the following traits if the element type allows it:
 ///
 /// - [`Copy`]