Merge pull request #1511 from Manishearth/bugfix

fix false negatives introduced in the rustup
This commit is contained in:
Martin Carton 2017-02-04 22:37:35 +01:00 committed by GitHub
commit 3fbaacd768
2 changed files with 14 additions and 0 deletions

View file

@ -949,6 +949,7 @@ fn derefs_to_slice(cx: &LateContext, expr: &hir::Expr, ty: ty::Ty) -> Option<sug
fn may_slice(cx: &LateContext, ty: ty::Ty) -> bool {
match ty.sty {
ty::TySlice(_) => true,
ty::TyAdt(def, _) if def.is_box() => may_slice(cx, ty.boxed_ty()),
ty::TyAdt(..) => match_type(cx, ty, &paths::VEC),
ty::TyArray(_, size) => size < 32,
ty::TyRef(_, ty::TypeAndMut { ty: inner, .. }) => may_slice(cx, inner),
@ -965,6 +966,7 @@ fn derefs_to_slice(cx: &LateContext, expr: &hir::Expr, ty: ty::Ty) -> Option<sug
} else {
match ty.sty {
ty::TySlice(_) => sugg::Sugg::hir_opt(cx, expr),
ty::TyAdt(def, _) if def.is_box() && may_slice(cx, ty.boxed_ty()) => sugg::Sugg::hir_opt(cx, expr),
ty::TyRef(_, ty::TypeAndMut { ty: inner, .. }) => {
if may_slice(cx, inner) {
sugg::Sugg::hir_opt(cx, expr)

View file

@ -350,6 +350,7 @@ fn or_fun_call() {
/// Checks implementation of `ITER_NTH` lint
fn iter_nth() {
let mut some_vec = vec![0, 1, 2, 3];
let mut boxed_slice: Box<[u8]> = Box::new([0, 1, 2, 3]);
let mut some_vec_deque: VecDeque<_> = some_vec.iter().cloned().collect();
{
@ -358,6 +359,8 @@ fn iter_nth() {
//~^ERROR called `.iter().nth()` on a Vec. Calling `.get()` is both faster and more readable
let bad_slice = &some_vec[..].iter().nth(3);
//~^ERROR called `.iter().nth()` on a slice. Calling `.get()` is both faster and more readable
let bad_boxed_slice = boxed_slice.iter().nth(3);
//~^ERROR called `.iter().nth()` on a slice. Calling `.get()` is both faster and more readable
let bad_vec_deque = some_vec_deque.iter().nth(3);
//~^ERROR called `.iter().nth()` on a VecDeque. Calling `.get()` is both faster and more readable
}
@ -414,6 +417,7 @@ impl GetFalsePositive {
/// Checks implementation of `GET_UNWRAP` lint
fn get_unwrap() {
let mut boxed_slice: Box<[u8]> = Box::new([0, 1, 2, 3]);
let mut some_slice = &mut [0, 1, 2, 3];
let mut some_vec = vec![0, 1, 2, 3];
let mut some_vecdeque: VecDeque<_> = some_vec.iter().cloned().collect();
@ -422,6 +426,10 @@ fn get_unwrap() {
let mut false_positive = GetFalsePositive { arr: [0, 1, 2] };
{ // Test `get().unwrap()`
let _ = boxed_slice.get(1).unwrap();
//~^ERROR called `.get().unwrap()` on a slice. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise
//~|HELP try this
//~|SUGGESTION boxed_slice[1]
let _ = some_slice.get(0).unwrap();
//~^ERROR called `.get().unwrap()` on a slice. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise
//~|HELP try this
@ -447,6 +455,10 @@ fn get_unwrap() {
}
{ // Test `get_mut().unwrap()`
*boxed_slice.get_mut(0).unwrap() = 1;
//~^ERROR called `.get_mut().unwrap()` on a slice. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise
//~|HELP try this
//~|SUGGESTION &mut boxed_slice[0]
*some_slice.get_mut(0).unwrap() = 1;
//~^ERROR called `.get_mut().unwrap()` on a slice. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise
//~|HELP try this