Rollup merge of #92381 - ThePuzzlemaker:issue-92308, r=estebank

Suggest `return`ing tail expressions in async functions

This PR fixes #92308.

Previously, the suggestion to `return` tail expressions (introduced in #81769) did not apply to `async` functions, as the suggestion checked whether the types were equal disregarding `impl Future<Output = T>` syntax sugar for `async` functions. This PR changes that in order to fix a potential papercut.

I'm not sure if this is the "right" way to do this, so if there is a better way then please let me know.

I amended an existing test introduced in #81769 to add a regression test for this, if you think I should make a separate test I will.
This commit is contained in:
Matthias Krüger 2022-01-14 07:47:32 +01:00 committed by GitHub
commit 347c744fe0
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG key ID: 4AEE18F83AFDEB23
3 changed files with 54 additions and 3 deletions

View file

@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ use rustc_hir as hir;
use rustc_hir::def::{CtorOf, DefKind};
use rustc_hir::lang_items::LangItem;
use rustc_hir::{Expr, ExprKind, ItemKind, Node, Path, QPath, Stmt, StmtKind, TyKind};
use rustc_infer::infer;
use rustc_infer::infer::{self, TyCtxtInferExt};
use rustc_middle::lint::in_external_macro;
use rustc_middle::ty::{self, Binder, Ty};
use rustc_span::symbol::{kw, sym};
@ -608,6 +608,17 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> FnCtxt<'a, 'tcx> {
let bound_vars = self.tcx.late_bound_vars(fn_id);
let ty = self.tcx.erase_late_bound_regions(Binder::bind_with_vars(ty, bound_vars));
let ty = self.normalize_associated_types_in(expr.span, ty);
let ty = match self.tcx.asyncness(fn_id.owner) {
hir::IsAsync::Async => self.tcx.infer_ctxt().enter(|infcx| {
infcx.get_impl_future_output_ty(ty).unwrap_or_else(|| {
span_bug!(
fn_decl.output.span(),
"failed to get output type of async function"
)
})
}),
hir::IsAsync::NotAsync => ty,
};
if self.can_coerce(found, ty) {
err.multipart_suggestion(
"you might have meant to return this value",

View file

@ -1,3 +1,16 @@
// > Suggest `return`ing tail expressions that match return type
// >
// > Some newcomers are confused by the behavior of tail expressions,
// > interpreting that "leaving out the `;` makes it the return value".
// > To help them go in the right direction, suggest using `return` instead
// > when applicable.
// (original commit description for this test)
//
// This test was amended to also serve as a regression test for #92308, where
// this suggestion would not trigger with async functions.
//
// edition:2018
fn main() {
let _ = foo(true);
}
@ -5,6 +18,15 @@ fn main() {
fn foo(x: bool) -> Result<f64, i32> {
if x {
Err(42) //~ ERROR mismatched types
//| HELP you might have meant to return this value
}
Ok(42.0)
}
async fn bar(x: bool) -> Result<f64, i32> {
if x {
Err(42) //~ ERROR mismatched types
//| HELP you might have meant to return this value
}
Ok(42.0)
}

View file

@ -1,9 +1,10 @@
error[E0308]: mismatched types
--> $DIR/tail-expr-as-potential-return.rs:7:9
--> $DIR/tail-expr-as-potential-return.rs:28:9
|
LL | / if x {
LL | | Err(42)
| | ^^^^^^^ expected `()`, found enum `Result`
LL | | //| HELP you might have meant to return this value
LL | | }
| |_____- expected this to be `()`
|
@ -14,6 +15,23 @@ help: you might have meant to return this value
LL | return Err(42);
| ++++++ +
error: aborting due to previous error
error[E0308]: mismatched types
--> $DIR/tail-expr-as-potential-return.rs:20:9
|
LL | / if x {
LL | | Err(42)
| | ^^^^^^^ expected `()`, found enum `Result`
LL | | //| HELP you might have meant to return this value
LL | | }
| |_____- expected this to be `()`
|
= note: expected unit type `()`
found enum `Result<_, {integer}>`
help: you might have meant to return this value
|
LL | return Err(42);
| ++++++ +
error: aborting due to 2 previous errors
For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E0308`.