marker_traits: require EvaluatedToOk

This commit is contained in:
lcnr 2021-08-18 16:27:25 +02:00
parent 896f058f13
commit 3329f67f17
6 changed files with 93 additions and 3 deletions

View file

@ -1566,12 +1566,19 @@ impl<'cx, 'tcx> SelectionContext<'cx, 'tcx> {
// See if we can toss out `victim` based on specialization.
// This requires us to know *for sure* that the `other` impl applies
// i.e., `EvaluatedToOk`.
//
// FIXME(@lcnr): Using `modulo_regions` here seems kind of scary
// to me but is required for `std` to compile, so I didn't change it
// for now.
let tcx = self.tcx();
if other.evaluation.must_apply_modulo_regions() {
let tcx = self.tcx();
if tcx.specializes((other_def, victim_def)) {
return true;
}
return match tcx.impls_are_allowed_to_overlap(other_def, victim_def) {
}
if other.evaluation.must_apply_considering_regions() {
match tcx.impls_are_allowed_to_overlap(other_def, victim_def) {
Some(ty::ImplOverlapKind::Permitted { marker: true }) => {
// Subtle: If the predicate we are evaluating has inference
// variables, do *not* allow discarding candidates due to
@ -1616,7 +1623,7 @@ impl<'cx, 'tcx> SelectionContext<'cx, 'tcx> {
}
Some(_) => true,
None => false,
};
}
} else {
false
}

View file

@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
// check-pass
#![feature(marker_trait_attr)]
#[marker]
pub trait F {}
impl<T> F for T where T: Copy {}
impl<T> F for T where T: 'static {}
fn main() {}

View file

@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
#![feature(marker_trait_attr)]
#[marker]
trait A {}
impl<'a> A for (&'static (), &'a ()) {} //~ ERROR type annotations needed
impl<'a> A for (&'a (), &'static ()) {} //~ ERROR type annotations needed
fn main() {}

View file

@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
error[E0283]: type annotations needed
--> $DIR/region-overlap.rs:5:10
|
LL | impl<'a> A for (&'static (), &'a ()) {}
| ^ cannot infer type for tuple `(&'static (), &'a ())`
|
= note: cannot satisfy `(&'static (), &'a ()): A`
note: required by a bound in `A`
--> $DIR/region-overlap.rs:4:1
|
LL | trait A {}
| ^^^^^^^ required by this bound in `A`
error[E0283]: type annotations needed
--> $DIR/region-overlap.rs:6:10
|
LL | impl<'a> A for (&'a (), &'static ()) {}
| ^ cannot infer type for tuple `(&'a (), &'static ())`
|
= note: cannot satisfy `(&'a (), &'static ()): A`
note: required by a bound in `A`
--> $DIR/region-overlap.rs:4:1
|
LL | trait A {}
| ^^^^^^^ required by this bound in `A`
error: aborting due to 2 previous errors
For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E0283`.

View file

@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
#![feature(marker_trait_attr)]
#[marker]
trait A {}
trait B {}
impl<T: A> B for T {}
impl<T: B> A for T {}
impl A for &str {}
impl<T: A + B> A for (T,) {}
trait TraitWithAssoc {
type Assoc;
}
impl<T: A> TraitWithAssoc for T {
type Assoc = T;
}
impl TraitWithAssoc for ((&str,),) {
//~^ ERROR conflicting implementations
type Assoc = ((&'static str,),);
}
fn main() {}

View file

@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
error[E0119]: conflicting implementations of trait `TraitWithAssoc` for type `((&str,),)`
--> $DIR/unsound-overlap.rs:20:1
|
LL | impl<T: A> TraitWithAssoc for T {
| ------------------------------- first implementation here
...
LL | impl TraitWithAssoc for ((&str,),) {
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ conflicting implementation for `((&str,),)`
error: aborting due to previous error
For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E0119`.