rust/src/bit_mask.rs

238 lines
9.9 KiB
Rust
Raw Normal View History

use rustc::lint::*;
use rustc::middle::const_eval::lookup_const_by_id;
use rustc::middle::def::*;
use rustc_front::hir::*;
use rustc_front::util::is_comparison_binop;
use syntax::codemap::Span;
use syntax::ast::Lit_::*;
2015-07-26 16:53:11 +02:00
use utils::span_lint;
/// **What it does:** This lint checks for incompatible bit masks in comparisons. It is `Warn` by default.
///
/// The formula for detecting if an expression of the type `_ <bit_op> m <cmp_op> c` (where `<bit_op>`
2015-12-21 20:47:19 +01:00
/// is one of {`&`, `|`} and `<cmp_op>` is one of {`!=`, `>=`, `>`, `!=`, `>=`, `>`}) can be determined from the following table:
///
/// |Comparison |Bit-Op|Example |is always|Formula |
/// |------------|------|------------|---------|----------------------|
/// |`==` or `!=`| `&` |`x & 2 == 3`|`false` |`c & m != c` |
/// |`<` or `>=`| `&` |`x & 2 < 3` |`true` |`m < c` |
/// |`>` or `<=`| `&` |`x & 1 > 1` |`false` |`m <= c` |
/// |`==` or `!=`| `|` |`x | 1 == 0`|`false` |`c | m != c` |
/// |`<` or `>=`| `|` |`x | 1 < 1` |`false` |`m >= c` |
/// |`<=` or `>` | `|` |`x | 1 > 0` |`true` |`m > c` |
///
/// **Why is this bad?** If the bits that the comparison cares about are always set to zero or one by the bit mask, the comparison is constant `true` or `false` (depending on mask, compared value, and operators).
///
/// So the code is actively misleading, and the only reason someone would write this intentionally is to win an underhanded Rust contest or create a test-case for this lint.
///
/// **Known problems:** None
///
/// **Example:** `x & 1 == 2` (also see table above)
declare_lint! {
pub BAD_BIT_MASK,
2015-09-06 16:09:35 +02:00
Warn,
"expressions of the form `_ & mask == select` that will only ever return `true` or `false` \
(because in the example `select` containing bits that `mask` doesn't have)"
}
/// **What it does:** This lint checks for bit masks in comparisons which can be removed without changing the outcome. The basic structure can be seen in the following table:
///
/// |Comparison|Bit-Op |Example |equals |
/// |----------|---------|-----------|-------|
/// |`>` / `<=`|`|` / `^`|`x | 2 > 3`|`x > 3`|
/// |`<` / `>=`|`|` / `^`|`x ^ 1 < 4`|`x < 4`|
///
/// This lint is `Warn` by default.
///
/// **Why is this bad?** Not equally evil as [`bad_bit_mask`](#bad_bit_mask), but still a bit misleading, because the bit mask is ineffective.
///
/// **Known problems:** False negatives: This lint will only match instances where we have figured out the math (which is for a power-of-two compared value). This means things like `x | 1 >= 7` (which would be better written as `x >= 6`) will not be reported (but bit masks like this are fairly uncommon).
///
/// **Example:** `x | 1 > 3` (also see table above)
2015-05-15 14:09:29 +02:00
declare_lint! {
pub INEFFECTIVE_BIT_MASK,
Warn,
"expressions where a bit mask will be rendered useless by a comparison, e.g. `(x | 1) > 2`"
2015-05-15 14:09:29 +02:00
}
/// Checks for incompatible bit masks in comparisons, e.g. `x & 1 == 2`.
/// This cannot work because the bit that makes up the value two was
/// zeroed out by the bit-and with 1. So the formula for detecting if an
/// expression of the type `_ <bit_op> m <cmp_op> c` (where `<bit_op>`
/// is one of {`&`, '|'} and `<cmp_op>` is one of {`!=`, `>=`, `>` ,
/// `!=`, `>=`, `>`}) can be determined from the following table:
///
/// |Comparison |Bit-Op|Example |is always|Formula |
/// |------------|------|------------|---------|----------------------|
/// |`==` or `!=`| `&` |`x & 2 == 3`|`false` |`c & m != c` |
/// |`<` or `>=`| `&` |`x & 2 < 3` |`true` |`m < c` |
/// |`>` or `<=`| `&` |`x & 1 > 1` |`false` |`m <= c` |
/// |`==` or `!=`| `|` |`x | 1 == 0`|`false` |`c | m != c` |
2015-05-23 12:32:29 +02:00
/// |`<` or `>=`| `|` |`x | 1 < 1` |`false` |`m >= c` |
/// |`<=` or `>` | `|` |`x | 1 > 0` |`true` |`m > c` |
///
/// This lint is **deny** by default
///
/// There is also a lint that warns on ineffective masks that is *warn*
2015-08-19 09:07:50 +02:00
/// by default.
///
/// |Comparison|Bit-Op |Example |equals |Formula|
/// |`>` / `<=`|`|` / `^`|`x | 2 > 3`|`x > 3`|`¹ && m <= c`|
/// |`<` / `>=`|`|` / `^`|`x ^ 1 < 4`|`x < 4`|`¹ && m < c` |
///
/// `¹ power_of_two(c + 1)`
#[derive(Copy,Clone)]
pub struct BitMask;
impl LintPass for BitMask {
fn get_lints(&self) -> LintArray {
2015-05-15 14:09:29 +02:00
lint_array!(BAD_BIT_MASK, INEFFECTIVE_BIT_MASK)
}
}
impl LateLintPass for BitMask {
fn check_expr(&mut self, cx: &LateContext, e: &Expr) {
if let ExprBinary(ref cmp, ref left, ref right) = e.node {
if is_comparison_binop(cmp.node) {
fetch_int_literal(cx, right).map_or_else(||
fetch_int_literal(cx, left).map_or((), |cmp_val|
check_compare(cx, right, invert_cmp(cmp.node),
cmp_val, &e.span)),
|cmp_opt| check_compare(cx, left, cmp.node, cmp_opt,
&e.span))
}
}
}
}
fn invert_cmp(cmp : BinOp_) -> BinOp_ {
match cmp {
BiEq => BiEq,
BiNe => BiNe,
BiLt => BiGt,
BiGt => BiLt,
BiLe => BiGe,
BiGe => BiLe,
_ => BiOr // Dummy
}
}
fn check_compare(cx: &LateContext, bit_op: &Expr, cmp_op: BinOp_, cmp_value: u64, span: &Span) {
2015-09-19 05:02:56 +02:00
if let ExprBinary(ref op, ref left, ref right) = bit_op.node {
if op.node != BiBitAnd && op.node != BiBitOr {
return;
}
fetch_int_literal(cx, right).or_else(|| fetch_int_literal(
cx, left)).map_or((), |mask| check_bit_mask(cx, op.node,
cmp_op, mask, cmp_value, span))
}
}
fn check_bit_mask(cx: &LateContext, bit_op: BinOp_, cmp_op: BinOp_,
mask_value: u64, cmp_value: u64, span: &Span) {
match cmp_op {
BiEq | BiNe => match bit_op {
2015-09-06 16:09:35 +02:00
BiBitAnd => if mask_value & cmp_value != cmp_value {
if cmp_value != 0 {
span_lint(cx, BAD_BIT_MASK, *span, &format!(
"incompatible bit mask: `_ & {}` can never be equal to `{}`",
mask_value, cmp_value));
}
} else {
if mask_value == 0 {
span_lint(cx, BAD_BIT_MASK, *span, "&-masking with zero");
}
},
BiBitOr => if mask_value | cmp_value != cmp_value {
span_lint(cx, BAD_BIT_MASK, *span, &format!(
"incompatible bit mask: `_ | {}` can never be equal to `{}`",
mask_value, cmp_value));
},
_ => ()
},
BiLt | BiGe => match bit_op {
BiBitAnd => if mask_value < cmp_value {
span_lint(cx, BAD_BIT_MASK, *span, &format!(
"incompatible bit mask: `_ & {}` will always be lower than `{}`",
mask_value, cmp_value));
} else {
if mask_value == 0 {
span_lint(cx, BAD_BIT_MASK, *span, "&-masking with zero");
}
},
BiBitOr => if mask_value >= cmp_value {
span_lint(cx, BAD_BIT_MASK, *span, &format!(
"incompatible bit mask: `_ | {}` will never be lower than `{}`",
mask_value, cmp_value));
} else {
2015-08-19 09:07:50 +02:00
check_ineffective_lt(cx, *span, mask_value, cmp_value, "|");
},
2015-08-19 09:07:50 +02:00
BiBitXor =>
check_ineffective_lt(cx, *span, mask_value, cmp_value, "^"),
_ => ()
},
BiLe | BiGt => match bit_op {
BiBitAnd => if mask_value <= cmp_value {
span_lint(cx, BAD_BIT_MASK, *span, &format!(
"incompatible bit mask: `_ & {}` will never be higher than `{}`",
mask_value, cmp_value));
} else {
if mask_value == 0 {
span_lint(cx, BAD_BIT_MASK, *span, "&-masking with zero");
}
},
BiBitOr => if mask_value > cmp_value {
span_lint(cx, BAD_BIT_MASK, *span, &format!(
"incompatible bit mask: `_ | {}` will always be higher than `{}`",
mask_value, cmp_value));
} else {
2015-08-19 09:07:50 +02:00
check_ineffective_gt(cx, *span, mask_value, cmp_value, "|");
},
2015-08-19 09:07:50 +02:00
BiBitXor =>
check_ineffective_gt(cx, *span, mask_value, cmp_value, "^"),
_ => ()
},
_ => ()
}
}
fn check_ineffective_lt(cx: &LateContext, span: Span, m: u64, c: u64, op: &str) {
2015-08-19 09:07:50 +02:00
if c.is_power_of_two() && m < c {
span_lint(cx, INEFFECTIVE_BIT_MASK, span, &format!(
"ineffective bit mask: `x {} {}` compared to `{}`, is the same as x compared directly",
op, m, c));
}
}
fn check_ineffective_gt(cx: &LateContext, span: Span, m: u64, c: u64, op: &str) {
2015-08-19 09:07:50 +02:00
if (c + 1).is_power_of_two() && m <= c {
span_lint(cx, INEFFECTIVE_BIT_MASK, span, &format!(
"ineffective bit mask: `x {} {}` compared to `{}`, is the same as x compared directly",
op, m, c));
}
}
fn fetch_int_literal(cx: &LateContext, lit : &Expr) -> Option<u64> {
2015-08-21 20:44:48 +02:00
match lit.node {
ExprLit(ref lit_ptr) => {
2015-11-24 18:44:40 +01:00
if let LitInt(value, _) = lit_ptr.node {
2015-11-27 16:47:24 +01:00
Some(value) //TODO: Handle sign
} else { None }
}
2015-08-21 20:44:48 +02:00
ExprPath(_, _) => {
// Important to let the borrow expire before the const lookup to avoid double
// borrowing.
let def_map = cx.tcx.def_map.borrow();
match def_map.get(&lit.id) {
Some(&PathResolution { base_def: DefConst(def_id), ..}) => Some(def_id),
_ => None
2015-05-07 06:41:54 +02:00
}
}
2015-11-27 16:47:24 +01:00
.and_then(|def_id| lookup_const_by_id(cx.tcx, def_id, None))
.and_then(|l| fetch_int_literal(cx, l)),
2015-11-27 16:47:24 +01:00
_ => None
}
}